Jump to content
IGNORED

Coronavirus Covid-19 - opšta tema


Skyhighatrist

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Budja said:

 

Muka mi je od eksperata™.

 

Prva studija kaze ovo:

 

i ovo:

 

Nikako im nije palo napamet da se u Australji, Africi, Juznoj Americi, Indiji i Indoneziji virus pojavio znatno kasnije, pa je stoga i, do sada, manje sirenje? Nije im palo na pamet da Island, Holandija, Nemacka, Svedska testiraju ko ludi dok u Ekvadoru nema testova?

 

Anegodtalno: U Ekvadoru je 15 marta bilo, recimo, 30ak slucajeva, danas 2000 istih, uglavnom u vlaznom Gvajakiluna 30 stepeni.

 

Mislim, moguce je da temperatura ima uticaj ali, prosto, kauzalna veza sa podacima koji do sada postoje tesko moze da se dokaze.

Slicno vazi i za drugu studiju koja se oslanja na "daily confirmed cases" a nema nikakve kontrolne varijable, tipa, policy response. Ova studija samo kaze da se u Wuhanu brze sirilo nego

Ma pusti bre te gluposti, to je samo lupetanje i objavljivanje nečega da se tek objavi. To je sve nivo onoga, virus je težak i pada, i da se pije mešavina bikarbone sode i limuna.

Link to comment
2 hours ago, mustang said:

ispod sunset bulevara, u holivudu. mrak ko na selu, nosim lampu od 1000 lumena. videla rakuna kako pretrcava ulicu

e jeste, polarnog medveda

Link to comment
10 hours ago, arheolog1981 said:

Holandija 11.750 obolelih


 

Podaci o broju zaraženih u Holandiji su potpuno proizvoljni, jer se testiraju samo medicinski radnici i pacijenti koji moraju na bolničko lečenje.


Koliko je stvarno zaraženih, niko ne zna.

 

Tako je već oko dve nedelje.
Predstavnici Instituta za javno zdravlje "RIVM" su, na veliko čuđenje stručnjaka, nešto stidljivo kenjkali kako testiranje nema mnogo smisla, bitan je, navodno,  broj pacijenata u bolnicama.
Nikome nje bila jasna takva politika u državi sa najvećim brojem mikrobiologa po glavi stanovnika (dobro, šalim se, ali tu je negde). Uz to i SZO viče "testirajte što više", a RIVM to ne radi, jer, eto, znaju bolje.

 

Na kraju su istraživački novinari otkrili u čemu je štos.

 

Ponestalo je lizanta (*)

80% laboratorija koristi (veoma high tech i veoma skupe) uređaje farmaceutskog giganta "Roche". Firma ne može da isporuči lizante, jer je potražnja iz celog sveta ogromna.  Istovremeno, firma smatra da je recept za lizante tajna koja se ne deli sa mušterijama.

 

Pod pritiskom javnosti i političara Roche je na kraju pristao da da recept za lizante, ali tvrde da ne garantuju tačnost rezultata ako se za izradu koriste tuđi sastojci...


(*)  Lizant - mikrobiološko ispitivanje ćelije je nemoguće sve dok je ćelijska membrana netaknuta, jer je ta memebrana izuzetno dobro sve blokira. Treba je probiti, a da se pri tome ne uništi i sadržaj ćelije.
Taj proces se zove liziranje, a kada se radi hemijskim putem, kao priprema za high tech analizu, hemijska smesa kojom se to radi se zove lizant (engl. "lysis buffer").
 Od lizanta zavisi i krajnji rezultat, kada se koriste automatski high tech uređaji.

 

 

Edited by Yossarian
prebrzo kucam i pravim mnogo grešaka
Link to comment
3 minutes ago, Yossarian said:

P.S. U međuvremenu su naručili veliki broj "brzih" testova iz Kine, koji su na putu i treba da stignu još ove nedelje.

Koji uopšte nisu proizvedeni u nekoj licenciranoj laboratoriji-fabrici, niti u skladu sa postojećim standardima. O pouzdanosti tih testova ne bih.

Link to comment

I spanci su narucili pa su se opekli.

 

Taj Lizant je svugdje u svijetu problem osim mozda u SAD i Kini jer ga oni i proizvode (vjerovatno i Njemacka). Zbog toga ima onoliko testova u americi. 

 

Problem je komunikacija evropskih vlada. Ista stnar i sa maskama.

Link to comment
9 hours ago, Redoran said:

Šta forumski Šveđani i Šveđanke kažu na ovo?

 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/30/catastrophe-sweden-coronavirus-stoicism-lockdown-europe

 

 

A petition signed by more than 2,000 doctors, scientists, and professors last week – including the chairman of the Nobel Foundation, Prof Carl-Henrik Heldin – called on the government to introduce more stringent containment measures. “We’re not testing enough, we’re not tracking, we’re not isolating enough – we have let the virus loose,” said Prof Cecilia Söderberg-Nauclér, a virus immunology researcher at the Karolinska Institute. “They are leading us to catastrophe.”

 

Strong words, but stoicism is a way of life here, as is unflappability. A 300-year history of efficient and transparent public administration, and high levels of trust in experts and governing officials, have left the public inclined to believe what they are told, and that those doing the telling have their best interests at heart.

 

 

404 - ne radi link, ali znam, ‘ajde tačnije, pretpostavljam o čemu je tekst. Gardijan kasni jedno nedelju dana. U ovom, tj. tom krugu, debata je završena. Nije da se ne javljaju nove, u varijacijama na temu, na svakih dan-dva. :D

 

Bilo je baš dosta reakcija na otvoreno pismo kojim se obznanila peticija. U komentarima su se neki od potpisnika i javljali da brane stavove. Suma sumarum, priznaje se ograničenje - oni pojedinačno možda i imaju dovoljno kompetencije, ali Istitut/Zavod/Uprava za javno zdravlje ima sve tj. svu kompetenciju pod jednim krovom, i odluke se donose za celinu, ali ipak ne misle da greše. OK.

Link to comment

Fingers crossed ovakva debata će prevladati - Google preveden izvod priloga "Horror forecasts about corona make decision-making more difficult":

"What does a future scenario look like for Sweden? Sweden came in early with measures and focuses on infection protection, especially towards the risk groups. Our elderly are perhaps healthier and our health care is at least as good as in Italy. Even today we can expect a less explosive development. Such a flattening of the epidemic curve is extremely important for healthcare in the future. If you translate my hypotheses above into numbers in Sweden, we would have a maximum of 1,000 deaths before we reached more than 50 percent herd immunity. That would mean less than 1 percent of our total mortality in 2020, but with maybe 3 times as many (3,000) intensive care. The other day, a "realistic worst case scenario" came from the Public Health Authority of 5,000 intensive care patients over the next six months, which is in good agreement with my picture.
Sweden's corona strategy is under severe pressure from the outside, but also from within - it is said to "sacrifice" the sick and dead to save the economy. Ethical philosophers perceive that we choose between more deaths or unhappy populations. It's a misconception. If the main focus is on protecting at risk groups rather than completely limiting the epidemic, we can ultimately have both fewer deaths and a more satisfied society.
The problem with unforeseen forecasts is that they create panic and fear in people and business. It makes it difficult for politicians to decide on a balance between measures for health and costs for society. It makes it impossible to make health economic assessments. Those who render inconvenient scenarios abuse and undermine confidence in the "expertise" and adore rogue social media." (Anders Björkman, infectious physician, professor of infectious medicine, Karolinska Institutet. Has worked in the field of the eradication of smallpox, participated in the start of WHO's global HIV / AIDS program, researched for 40 years on malaria and participated in the Swedish effort against ebola in Liberia.)

Edited by TdEII
dodat autor
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...