Jump to content
IGNORED

Premier League 2017-18


ArleKino

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 minutes ago, J.R. Cash said:

 

Cek prvo da analiziramo seriju sa vimea. Sta kazes na onu situaciju? Po cemu se reakcija branica zelenih razlikuje od Lovrove?

 

Dosta su slične situacije realno, ali to što uopšte analiziramo razlike između odbitka i namernog igranja loptom smatram pobedom. :sleep:

To valjda znači da prihvatate da u slučaju da se ono lovrovo tumači kao deliberate play jeste jasan ofsajd. Sad dal jeste ili nije...pa ok je da to bude podložno tumačenju.

 

Za mene zaista jeste deliberate i ne vidim ništa sporno, ako za nekog nije i to je ok.

  • Replies 15.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Pokojni Ruxin

    1570

  • Weenie Pooh

    1317

  • copkillah

    874

  • Прслин

    827

Posted

bakayoko odigrao najgorih pola sata jednog igraca poslednjih par godina. i pored toga po malo prestrogo dosudjen drugi zuti. penal je cist. 

zivo me zanima sta ce conte izmisliti za drugo poluvreme. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, 189- said:

bakayoko odigrao najgorih pola sata jednog igraca poslednjih par godina. i pored toga po malo prestrogo dosudjen drugi zuti. penal je cist. 

zivo me zanima sta ce conte izmisliti za drugo poluvreme. 

 

Giroud zabija glavom za 1:1 u 87.minuti.

Posted

Evo vam i gosn kolina iz 2013., ne znam koliko je on upućen

 

UEFA's chief refereeing officer Pierluigi Collina was on hand in Nyon to ensure that the training sessions featuring the assistant referees were carried out in line with the new provisions, and explained the amendments to UEFA.com.

"Last March, IFAB changed the instruction and guidelines of Law 11 concerning what is meant as interfering with an opponent, and what is meant as gaining an advantage from being in an offside position," he said.

"This course [was] very focused on offside, as it's important to have the assistant referees attuned to the new interpretation and to the new text of Law 11. Offside is such an important thing that it deserves to be carefully dealt with.

"The main things to be considered now with offsides, in assessing the position of a player as interfering with an opponent, [involve] clearly obstructing the line of vision of an opponent and challenging the opponent for the ball. So these are the two criteria to be assessed in order to deem a player who is in an offside position as punishable.

"Gaining an advantage from being in an offside position ... now the assistant referees and the referees should consider the nature of the play of the defender, because if the defender made a deliberate play, the outcome of the play doesn't matter – with the exception of a 'save' – and so being in an offside position and gaining an advantage from being in an offside position is not an offence any more."

Do these changes give referees different things to think about in match situations? "Certainly it's more important now to assess the intention of the player," Collina reflected. "It means the referee and the assistant referees must be very careful in assessing if the player deliberately played the ball or not."

Posted

Konkretno o ovoj situaciji ako se izjasni prenesi. Ovo uopsteno pise i u pravilima, nismo blize istini :)

Posted

Зашто се свађате око правила док Челзи гори? 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Прслин said:

Зашто се свађате око правила док Челзи гори? 

 

We're not arguing with him, we're telling him :fantom:

 

Posted

Pozdrav drugari. Ako neko nekad pita gde je ruxin vi mu recite - otišao jer nismo hteli da naučimo pravila ofsajda :sleep:

Posted
13 minutes ago, Ruxin said:

Pozdrav drugari. Ako neko nekad pita gde je ruxin vi mu recite - otišao jer nismo hteli da naučimo pravila ofsajda :sleep:

iguman, manastir

 

:fantom:

 

Posted

i dalje raspravljate da li je ofsajd kada odbrambeni igrač doda? nevera

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...