Trump - hoće li biti impeachment ili 8 godina drugačijeg predsednikovanja?

[Frank Pembleton]

Dobar.

Edited February 14, 2017 by Frank Pembleton

[Takeshi]

• Transcripts of intercepted calls between Flynn and Russian ambassador to the US, Sergey Kislyev, as described by US officials to various news outlets, showed the two had discussed sanctions ahead of Trump’s inauguration, when Flynn was part of the transition team but not in post as national security adviser

 

savetnik za bezbednost pao na prisluskivanju. nije znao da se i to radi  :D

[duda]

Njuzovci najzad uspeli da me nasmeju posle dugo vremena. #NijeNjuz 

 

a ima i banetovo, za gledaoce i. ivanovića

manje sofisticirano, ali nije loše

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sq8N4JV0BNA

[steins]

Ajd nek mi neko dajdžeszita ovo oko Flina - jel mu zameraju što je pričao  Rusima ili mu zameraju šta je pričao s rusima il nešto treće?

 

I kog vraga je imao prvo da laže o sedenju s ruskim ambasadorom?

[Lord Protector]

Formalno mu zameraju što je direktno slagao potpredsednika Pensa da je sa ruskim ambasadorom razgovarao o sankcijama. Pens je jako bitan Trampu zbog njegovog ugleda među republikancima. Druga stvar je nemogućnost Flina da bude timski igrač, ima poprilično haotičan način rada, to je izgleda iritiralo Trampovo okruženje.  

[vememah]

Najviše to što je ispalo da je Pens lažov. Pročitaj ceo članak WP-a, dobar je.
 

The emerging details contradict public statements by incoming senior administration officials including Mike Pence, then the vice president-elect. They acknowledged only a handful of text messages and calls exchanged between Flynn and Kislyak late last year and denied that either ever raised the subject of sanctions.

 

“They did not discuss anything having to do with the United States’ decision to expel diplomats or impose censure against Russia,” Pence said in an interview with CBS News last month, noting that he had spoken with Flynn about the matter. Pence also made a more sweeping assertion, saying there had been no contact between members of Trump’s team and Russia during the campaign. To suggest otherwise, he said, “is to give credence to some of these bizarre rumors that have swirled around the candidacy.”

...

Nine current and former officials, who were in senior positions at multiple agencies at the time of the calls, spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss intelligence matters.

 

All of those officials said ­Flynn’s references to the election-related sanctions were explicit. Two of those officials went further, saying that Flynn urged Russia not to overreact to the penalties being imposed by President Barack Obama, making clear that the two sides would be in position to review the matter after Trump was sworn in as president.

 

“Kislyak was left with the impression that the sanctions would be revisited at a later time,” said a former official.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/national-security-adviser-flynn-discussed-sanctions-with-russian-ambassador-despite-denials-officials-say/2017/02/09/f85b29d6-ee11-11e6-b4ff-ac2cf509efe5_story.html

 

To se odnosi na onaj čuveni Trampov tvit kojim hvali Putina za to što nije preduzeo recipročne mere:

 

Edited February 14, 2017 by vememah

[Lord Protector]

WP navodi i da je Preibus u Trampovoj nemilosti. Po svoj prilici vodi se bitka ko će imati veći uticaj na Trampa. Svaki dan iskaču neki novi igrači.

[marv]

we even made serbia pay for wall 

 

 

[Roger Sanchez]

[Roger Sanchez]

Gadan taj 28.2.

 

[Roger Sanchez]

[Redoran]

Deep State se ne šali, ovo je rana faza puča.

[Lord Protector]

Elliott Abrams Blames Steve Bannon for Blocking Job in Trump Administration

 

Former Reagan and Bush official Elliott Abrams is deeply upset with White House chief strategist Steve Bannon, after he was passed over for a job in Donald Trump’s administration.

 

Abrams was rumored to join the State Department as a deputy to Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, but was ultimately rejected.

“The only person on the White House staff that I know was opposed to my being hired was Steve Bannon so that’s my guess,” Abrams told CNN’s Erin Burnett in an interview on Monday. “It’s a guess.”

Abrams didn’t mention that Sen. Rand Paul was opposed to his appointment because of Abrams’ neocon views.

“In a country of 300 million people, surely there are reasonable foreign policy experts who have not been convicted of deceiving Congress and actually share the President’s foreign policy views,” Paul wrote in an op-ed.

Abrams also ignored his role in the Iran-Contra scandal under Reagan, pleading guilty to misdemeanors in the scandal. George H.W. Bush pardoned Abrams at the end of his administration. He also didn’t mention his dogged support for the war in Iraq, something Trump remains opposed to.

At the end, Abrams had hoped that although he criticized Trump during the election, the president would allow him to join the administration.

Abrams authored an article in the Weekly Standard with the headline “When you can’t stand your candidate,” calling for the Never Trump movement to challenge him in the convention. He also described Trump as a candidate was “someone who cannot win and should not be president of the United States.”

“Do not allow the Republican convention to be a coronation wherein Trump and Trumpism are unchallenged,” he wrote.

 

Edited February 14, 2017 by slow

[Roger Sanchez]

 

[bigvlada]

Deep State se ne šali, ovo je rana faza puča.

 

Bolje mu je da ne ide u Dalas do kraja mandata.