zmanic Posted January 30, 2017 Posted January 30, 2017 Nije to srbijica pa da je kafana institucija preča od svega.
Aineko Posted January 30, 2017 Posted January 30, 2017 Meni se ovaj ukaz Trampa ne razlikuje mnogo od odluke EU da odlaze bezvizni rezim Ukrajincima. Ta zemlja je dovedena polickom krizom u nevidjeni ekonomski corsokak, zacudo i mesanjem Unije. Dvostruki arsini vodjeni trostrukim interesima je odlika nekih nesposobnih drzavnika koji prisvajaju tudju vojsku kad misle da se brane od tudjih interesa a kod polaganja racuna se prave ludi. Eno Merkel i njeni poreznici se ne brinu previse zbog Trampavog krsenja Zenevske konvencije (dobro, napominje mu je...) vec se brinu sto Tramp trazi vise novaca za Blitz-kampanju protiv Islamista. Uostalom, sta to znaci pored Sirije koja je vec zauzeta zona? Vracanje u Irak za jos jednu rundu Mission Accomplishmenta. jeste, to kad zivis negde godinama, mozda imas i porodicu, odes na sluzbeni put na tri dana i odjednom ne mozes da se vratis u zemlju je samo malo razlicito od odlaganja bezviznog rezima... jbt, ja ne verujem sta ova dva dana citam na oba foruma.
ObiW Posted January 30, 2017 Posted January 30, 2017 Nije to srbijica pa da je kafana institucija preča od svega. Izgleda da je poenta ovoga puta proletela visoko iznad tvoje glave. :(
Roger Sanchez Posted January 30, 2017 Posted January 30, 2017 (edited) @Roger, @Host Veza između Obaminog i Trampovog dekreta je naravno identičan spisak nepoželjnih, problematičnih država. Mera nije ista, niti je iko tvrdio da je ista, ali vi slobodno nastavite da se borite protiv fantomskog #svisuistizma. Ko neće da vidi da se jedno direktno nadovezuje na drugo, da bez ograničenja pristupa onima koji su se očešali o terorističke krajeve u prethodnih par godina danas teško da bi bilo blanko zabrana - ne mora. Između onog posta ''ej, Barak Obmana samo što im nije potpuno ukinuo prava na putovanje u Juesej, Trampara je otišao samo koračić dalje'' i ovog ''ej, viđe, isti popis, eej!!'' velika je razlika, pa se ne bih previše zadržavao na ovoj tvojoj klimavoj obrani savršenosti. Nego, htio bih primijetiti nešto drugo. Ovo preciziranje koje je dano BoJou, megacaru magarcu FCO-a, sigurno ne stoji jer se prema njemu Tramparina EO više ne odnosi na nikoga. Naime, ne bih rekao da postoji ijedan direktan civilni let iz bilo koje od tih zemalja i US-a, osim eventualno iz Iraka, ali i u to sumnjam. Dakle, idioti opet nešto muljaju, ali nisam vidio na tvitaču da je to itko shvatio. Ajde, i meni je trebalo malo sna da mi sine. Edited January 30, 2017 by Roger Sanchez
Ayatollah Posted January 30, 2017 Posted January 30, 2017 (edited) naravno da nije to poenta. no moral na stranu, ovo je teska lakrdija od politike ne samo u sustini, nego jednako i u formi, i nezamislivo mi je da je 1 americka administracija to sebi dozvolila. ovakve stvari se, kazem, nezavisno od sustine, spremaju mesecima, officials, kompanije i svakojako osoblje se upoznaje sa proceduramam pravilima i postupcima, konsultuju se pravnici. Ne, ne kazem da bi u tom slucaju sve bilo ok, ne bi ni najmanje, ali ovo kako je uradjeno je kako mali perica zamislja - sta bih radio da postanem predsednik amerike. Lakrdija, nema druge reci. Do ovoga je došlo zbog toga što Tramp misli da može da vodi državu kao što je vodio kompaniju. Mene način na koji je doneta ova odluka jako podseća na više desetina situacija tokom moje korporativne karijere, kada je top menadžment u roku od dan-dva donosio ishitrene, nepromišljene i nezakonite odluke pod uticajem finansija ili prodaje, uprkos protivljenju legal-a ili compliance-a, pa posle vrlo brzo reterirao, kad je video da stvar ne prolazi/veliki je rizik. Tramp je ovde postupio kao tipičan CEO koji seče stvari kao satarom i preuzima rizik za to, ali takve stvari ne pale kod rukovođenja državom, jer ona finkcioniše bitno drugačije od kompanije, naročito država kakva je SAD. Suma sumarum, Tramp mora očigledno mnogo da nauči o tome kako se upravlja državom, i da tu ne rade korporativni trikovi i fazoni. Edited January 30, 2017 by Ayatollah
Roger Sanchez Posted January 30, 2017 Posted January 30, 2017 (edited) Do ovoga je došlo zbog toga što Tramp misli da može da vodi državu kao što je vodio kompaniju. Mene način na koji je doneta ova odluka jako podseća na više desetina situacija tokom moje korporativne karijere, kada je top menadžment u roku od dan-dva donosio ishitrene, nepromišljene i nezakonite odluke pod uticajem finansija ili prodaje, uprkos protivljenju legal-a ili compliance-a. Tramp je ovde postupio kao tipičan CEO koji seče stvari kao satarom i preuzima rizik za to, ali takve stvari ne pale kod rukovođenja državom, jer ona finkcioniše bitno drugačije od kompanije, naročito država kakva je SAD. Suma sumarum, Tramp mora očigledno mnogo da nauči o tome kako se upravlja državom, i da tu ne rade korporativni trikovi i fazoni. Problem je što mu to sastavljaju stafferi, a nad njim dok potpisuje stoje Zla Irska Pijandura™, Kellyanne, Reince i Zet™, pa se bojim da nije riječ samo o Trampari nego o kolektivnom nečemu, možda je strategija, možda nesposobnost, možda ludilo, možda zlo, ili da skratim, možda je GOP, to u sebi objedinjuje sve navedeno. Edited January 30, 2017 by Roger Sanchez
MNE Posted January 30, 2017 Posted January 30, 2017 Znamo i za Hirosimu i Nagasaki. znamo i za to da bi mnogo više ljudi poginulo da se nastavilo konvencionalno ratovanje, znamo i za to da je Tokio bukvalno spaljen zapaljivim bombama što je jedno 10 puta gore od atomki da ne pričam o Vijetnamu kasnije
gone fishing Posted January 30, 2017 Posted January 30, 2017 znamo i za to da bi mnogo više ljudi poginulo da se nastavilo konvencionalno ratovanje, znamo i za to da je Tokio bukvalno spaljen zapaljivim bombama što je jedno 10 puta gore od atomki da ne pričam o Vijetnamu kasnije yep ameri su izračunali da bi ih osvajanje samo jednog (južnog) od 3 glavna ostrva japana koštalo 10x više od osvajanja okinave a tu su izgubili oko U.S. manpower losses amounted to over 82,000 casualties, including non-battle casualties (psychiatric, injuries, illnesses) of whom over 12,500 were killed or missing. Battle deaths were 4,907 Navy, 4,675 Army, and 2,938 Marine Corps personnel.[8] Several thousand servicemen who died indirectly (from wounds and other causes) at a later date are not included in the total. - dok su japanci najebali ko žuti and 77,166 Japanese soldiers, excluding those who died from their injuries later. No figures are given for supporting Japanese forces killed. Allied grave registration forces counted 110,071 dead bodies. 42,000 to 150,000 local civilians (including all male citizens over 18, and many drafted male and female students under age 18) were killed, committed suicide or went missing, a significant proportion of the estimated pre-war 300,000 local population što će reći da su japanci u tih 82 krvavih borbi izgubili više ljudi nego u hirošimi i nagasakiju zajedno...
Utvara Posted January 30, 2017 Posted January 30, 2017 Problem je što mu to sastavljaju stafferi, a nad njim dok potpisuje stoje Zla Irska Pijandura™, Kellyanne, Reince i Zet™, pa se bojim da nije riječ samo o Trampari nego o kolektivnom nečemu, možda je strategija, možda nesposobnost, možda ludilo, možda zlo, ili da skratim, možda je GOP, to u sebi objedinjuje sve navedeno.Daj bože da mu sede Kellyanne i Reince. Ma neka mu sedi i Zla Irska Pijandura, samo neka ga ne puštaju da se sam sigra sa papirima i dugmićima. Njega treba držati kao desetogodišnje dete, stalno ga dadiljati ili će nešto ukakiti ili gurati prste u šteker. Mislim da je majmun ušao u tenak, loose canon. Ne zna čovek šta je gore - da imamo POTUS-a koji je lutka na koncima Bilderberške grupe i neke special interest grupacije, ili autentični ludak koji pritiska sve dugmiće koje vidi i potpisuje sve što mu se da pod ruku.
Roger Sanchez Posted January 30, 2017 Posted January 30, 2017 Daj bože da mu sede Kellyanne i Reince. Ma neka mu sedi i Zla Irska Pijandura, samo neka ga ne puštaju da se sam sigra sa papirima i dugmićima. Njega treba držati kao desetogodišnje dete, stalno ga dadiljati ili će nešto ukakiti ili gurati prste u šteker. Mislim da je majmun ušao u tenak, loose canon. Ne zna čovek šta je gore - da imamo POTUS-a koji je lutka na koncima Bilderberške grupe i neke special interest grupacije, ili autentični ludak koji pritiska sve dugmiće koje vidi i potpisuje sve što mu se da pod ruku. Da ponovim, mene ne brine Trampara kao karakter, osim što je plitak, ali jako me brine taj cabal luđaka, manijaka i lupeža, ukratko, GOP, oko njega.
Lord Protector Posted January 30, 2017 Posted January 30, 2017 (edited) Braća Koch protiv Trampa Koch Advocacy Group Hits Speaker Ryan’s ‘Buy American’ Tax Plan The pro-jobs tax plan being developed by establishment Republicans, including House Speaker Paul Ryan, is now being opposed by the Koch brothers’ advocacy group, Americans For Prosperity. The opposition of the Koch-funded group shows a widening clash between the GOP’s donors and Donald Trump’s expanding populist “Buy American, Hire American” coalition. So far, the two groups have clashed over cheap-labor immigration and Trump’s successful candidacy. That clash was garishly demonstrated late December, when Trump publicly booted a friend of David Koch off one of his golf courses, prompting Koch to also leave. Brothers Charles and David Koch opposed Trump during the Republican primary season and refused to help him against Hillary Clinton, partly because Trump and many of his voters oppose unrestricted trade and mass immigration. Koch Industries is the second-largest private company in the United States: Forbes placed its 2015 revenue at $115 billion, and the brothers spend much money to fund the AFP’s network of small-government political advocacy. The Koch opposition to the new tax plan appeared Jan. 27 in a letter from AFP’s “chief government affairs officer,” Brent Gardner. He argues that the plan would lead to “a whopping tax hike of more than $1 trillion on American families and small businesses over 10 years.” Supporters of the draft tax plan say it would prod companies to hire Americans and buy American products by first slashing the ordinary corporate tax and but then imposing a 20 percent “border adjustment” tax on imported goods and components. Companies would avoid the “border adjustment” tax by hiring Americans, or buying U.S.-built robots or buying U.S-manufactured parts. But the plan would also nudge up prices of foreign goods and products now sold at mainstream stories, such as WalMart. That’s the button being mashed by opponent of the tax, who say Trump’s middle-class and working-class voters would protest at the price hike. “This is bad politics — if the left is smart, they can easily label this a ‘poor tax,’ a tax on WalMart shoppers to pay for a tax break for wealthy corporations,” said one free-market advocate. House Republicans who are going along with this plan, tempting as it might be, are setting themselves up for disaster as soon as working Americans realize they elected Republicans [in 2016] … and the first thing they’re going to get is a 20 percent tax on anything produced outside their borders … Politically, this is a loser … probably the biggest big tax hike since the Clintons were in the White house, which would be a difficult first step for a Trump administration. According to an analysis by Breitbart: Trump’s trade economist Peter Navarro supports the concept of a “border adjustment tax” to boost U.S. domestic manufacturing by taxing imports to offset America’s sky-high 35 percent U.S. corporate tax rate … The border adjustment measure is the linchpin of Ryan’s “Better Way” tax reform blueprint, which was discussed with Trump’s transition team during a January 16 meeting on Capitol Hill… Speaker Ryan proposes to eliminate the corporate income tax and replace it with a “destination-based cash-flow tax” (DBCFT) to make the U.S. an attractive location for international investor. The DBCFT is basically value-added tax (VAT), like every other advanced nation currently employs. But the big difference in the “Better Way” is that U.S. companies still be able to deduct the cost of labor costs, like the current corporate tax. U.S. companies are subject to a maximum 35 percent worldwide corporate income tax rate. That compares to a top corporate tax rate of 18.6 percent in Europe and a 15 percent in China, which serves as a strong incentive for companies to locate production outside if the U.S. Economists Alan Auerbach and Douglas Holtz-Eakin are both advocates of border adjustments. They argued in a recent paper that “unlike tariffs on imports or subsidies for exports, border adjustments are not trade policy. Instead, they are paired and equal adjustments that create a level tax playing field for domestic and overseas competition.” But the tax plan would complicate business for companies that now import foreign machinery and parts, such as Asian-made pipelines or earth-moving machinery. Koch Industries is a network of high-tech, machine-intensive companies that often pay good salaries. But it and many other companies could be hit by the tax when they’re importing foreign parts and components. The AFP advocacy group claims to have 3.2 million grassroots members, and is formally independent of the Koch Industries. But its advocacy matches the corporation’s interest in low taxes, modest government and light regulation. In December, for example, the company directly criticized the “border adjustment” proposal. “While companies like Koch who manufacture and produce many products domestically would greatly benefit in the short-term, the long-term consequences to the economy and the American consumer could be devastating,” said a statement from Philip Ellender, the public affairs chief at Koch Companies Public Sector, LLC. He said: The proposed border tax adjustment will distort the market, increase consumer prices and create an uneven playing field for companies and consumers alike. The tax plan is being prepared at the House Ways and Means Committee, chaired by Texas Rep. Kevin Brady. “The main goal of our tax reform blueprint is to grow our economy and help all Americans become more prosperous,” said a statement from Brady’s press aide. “For too long, our broken tax code has put America at a disadvantage in the global economy. When combined with the other pro-growth reforms we are proposing, ending the “Made in America” tax will dramatically simplify our international tax system, level the playing field for “Made in America” products, and help our workers and businesses compete and win anywhere in the world,” said the statement. Edited January 30, 2017 by slow
boshoku Posted January 30, 2017 Posted January 30, 2017 oni imaju još dva brata kojih se stide (pogotovu fredija)
Takeshi Posted January 30, 2017 Posted January 30, 2017 The Internet Is Not Happy With Ivanka Trump's Latest Instagram Post The first daughter is taking heat for posting an outfit photo during Saturday's immigration ban protests napali ivanku zasto je okacila fotografiju sa muzem, dok su istog dana bili protesti po aerodromima
Recommended Posts