bradilko Posted January 17, 2017 Posted January 17, 2017 izbor trampare je reakcija zdravoga društva. takođe ako neki npr šešelj voli srneća leđa to ne znači da ih ja moram zamrzeti da bi bio kao različit od njega po svaku cenu. ono što trampara propoveda ne bi trebalo da postoji i kao pitanje da su ti vrli klintoni,bušovi,obame itd rešavali stvari. otkud posle obame dođe tramp? ako je tih 8 godina donelo dobrobit.. i razliku sad bi mogli da smanjimo ulogu obame ali onda smanjimo i ulogu trampare. nema tu mesta za gluposti tipa mržnja i koještarije.ako se ko raduje da neko zlo zadesi vodeću državu na svetu tome nisu sve ovce na broju i sigurno zbog takvih neću formirati mišljenje o američkom predsedniku kao nekoliko krstaša sa foruma. odjednom je usa politički sistem u usa postao toliko fragile da se takve gluposti ovde valjaju.te ovo je uvod u diktaturu te idiokratija koju nismo mogli da registrujemo i ranije.zar pitanje abortusa nije trebalo da bude van fokusa.ili useljeničko pitanje?odlazak radnih mesta u kinu i mexiko. šta je sprečavalo te vrle vođe da to reše davnih dana? čujem na n1 da je trampara izjavio da je nato zastarela organizacija.zvanične nemčuge i gali su zgroženi ovom izjavom.isti oni što su 80. ih tražili da se nato reformiše.zar se ne može raspravljati o nato paktu ili ćemo onak šorošovski odma nogom u stomak ko god načne tu temu ili trampara priča da treba poboljšati odnose sa rusijom bez dovođenja nekog novog jeljcina.odma se javljaju dežurni. sve u svemu izuzetan događaj u pozitivnom smislu je izbor trampa.čovek koji je bio određen kao pajac je na kraju dobio.prvo međ 'svojima' a onda i ukupno.račun bez krčmara nije prošao.
MNE Posted January 17, 2017 Posted January 17, 2017 pa Tramp je bio njihov kandidat republikanaca koga su gurali, e sad ko im je kriv kad su zadnji idioti pa nisu znali "na kompIjuter" pa se za to saznalo još prije izbora i onda su ljudi još iz većeg inata glasali za njega realno ta ekipa oko babe je toliko gadna (satanistički obredi i slične divote) a prosječan amer nije baš toliko napredan da to prihvati kao nešto normalno
bradilko Posted January 17, 2017 Posted January 17, 2017 Kako mozes da zivis u zemlji sa 48% nenormalne populacije? Pa to gore nego u Srbiji. eraser i anduril su sami sebe kompromitovali za bilo kakvu ozbiljnu raspravu.toliko su kontradiktorni da jedino mogu poslužiti za šalukomiku
Roger Sanchez Posted January 17, 2017 Posted January 17, 2017 eraser i anduril su sami sebe kompromitovali za bilo kakvu ozbiljnu raspravu.toliko su kontradiktorni da jedino mogu poslužiti za šalukomiku Slažem se, trebali bi vas poštediti tih trauma i ostavit vas da uživate ozbiljno raspravljajući s MNEom, urkozamanjem i ostalim prisutnim takojevićima i dubokoumnicima. Preklinjem ih da to i naprave.
Budja Posted January 17, 2017 Posted January 17, 2017 Jos malo o Klintonovima i donatorima. Humanost. The Clinton Global Initiative’s Ignominious EndThe Clinton Foundation just vindicated its critics. The Clinton Foundation filed papers this week warning that 22 staffers will be laid off on April 15, when the Clinton Global Initiative is formally shut down. The CGI is a program of the Clinton Foundation, centered around an annual meeting described as “the networking event of choice for corporations, nonprofits, nongovernmental organizations and wealthy philanthropists.” Before the election, when Hillary Clinton’s victory in the presidential race appeared likely, the Clinton Foundation declared that it would wind down the initiative no matter how the election turned out. At the time, those plans made sense: It would be unseemly to say the least if a corporate- and foreign-government-funded networking event was directly connected to the sitting president. But there was never much official explanation of why CGI would need to shut down in the case of a Clinton defeat. After all, the world didn’t run out of poor people or sick people on November 8. But after the election, some of the foundation’s donors acted as if the causes CGI supported were no longer worthy. The Australian government said it did not intend to continue its donations to the Clinton Foundation; it had given $88 million over ten years. After dramatically increasing its yearly donation in 2014 and 2015, the government of Norway chose to reduce its donation by 87 percent after the election. Why would foreign governments suddenly lose interest in the charitable work the Clinton Foundation purported to do? They wouldn’t, unless the Clinton Foundation and CGI had existed to give foreign governments and businessmen a way to curry favor with a future president from the beginning. The April shutdown, then, makes complete sense: Why keep operating if there’s no influence left to peddle? Clinton fans will vehemently deny that there’s anything to this cynical explanation, but the behavior of many foundation partners suggests that selling access and goodwill was a big part of the organization’s operations. Right before the election, one of the infamous WIkiLeaks documents revealed just how blurry the line was between the foundation’s non-profit activities and Bill Clinton’s for-profit activities. In a 2011 memo to Bill Clinton, Chelsea Clinton, John Podesta, and other members of the foundation’s board, the ex-president’s longtime aide Doug Band attempted to “clarify my activities on behalf of the President — both on behalf of non-profit Foundation activities and the management of the his [sic] for-profit business opportunities.” Band’s firm, Teneo, had consulted and raised money for the Clinton Foundation while simultaneously securing lucrative speaking and consulting gigs for the former president: We have dedicated ourselves to helping the President secure and engage in for-profit activities — including speeches, books, and advisory service engagements. In that context, we have in effect served as agents, lawyers, managers and implementers to secure speaking, business and advisory service deals. In support of the President’s for-profit activity, we also have solicited and obtained, as appropriate, in-kind services for the President and his family — for personal travel, hospitality, vacation and the like. Neither Justin nor I are separately compensated for these activities (e.g., we do not receive a fee for, or percentage of, the more than $50 million in for-profit activity we have personally helped to secure for President Clinton to date or the $66 million in future contracts, should he choose to continue with those engagements). With respect to business deals for his advisory services, Justin and I found, developed and brought to President Clinton multiple arrangements for him to accept or reject. Of his current 4 arrangements, we secured all of them; and, we have helped manage and maintain all of his for-profit business relationships for the past 11 years. Since 2001, President Clinton’s business arrangements have yielded more than $30 million for him personally, with $66 million to be paid out over the next nine years should he choose to continue with the current engagements. In short, when Band and his colleagues called up wealthy individuals and institutions — all of whom would have a strong incentive to be on good terms with Hillary Clinton, the likely future president — they sought financial help for the foundation and lucrative work for Bill Clinton. The line between charitable giving and the Clintons’ personal enrichment was exceptionally blurry, and those involved knew it. The simplest, easiest way for the Clintons, foundation donors, staffers, and allies to prove all the cynics wrong was for the foundation to operate after the election the same way it did before, proving that its purpose was genuinely charitable and altruistic rather than political. Instead, they’ve chosen to shut down CGI. The rest of us can draw our own conclusions as to why.
MNE Posted January 17, 2017 Posted January 17, 2017 Slažem se, trebali bi vas poštediti tih trauma i ostavit vas da uživate ozbiljno raspravljajući s MNEom, urkozamanjem i ostalim prisutnim takojevićima i dubokoumnicima. Preklinjem ih da to i naprave. Takojevići su oni koji su (bi) glasali za babu, ne miješaj nas sa njima.
urkozamanje Posted January 17, 2017 Posted January 17, 2017 Slažem se, trebali bi vas poštediti tih trauma i ostavit vas da uživate ozbiljno raspravljajući s MNEom, urkozamanjem i ostalim prisutnim takojevićima i dubokoumnicima. Preklinjem ih da to i naprave. Nemoj rodjo molim te, cekaj jbt, stani, daj neku britku analizu. Evo ja se izvinjavam sto numem, ali rad sam da saslusam nekog dubokoumnijeg, ozbiljnijeg analiticara koji je u materiji i ume tacno da predvidi ishode. Za tebe sam cuo da si profi. Jbg, to sigurno ima neku tezinu, jebo nas amatere. Ostani rodjo.
wall Posted January 17, 2017 Posted January 17, 2017 (edited) Izdaja, majkumu. Računam da je Hilari pobedila imali bi analize kojima se slavi sposobnost američkog naroda da hrabro grabi krupnim koracima ka boljitku, kako nema boljeg i poštenijeg sistema od elektorskog i kako je bravuroznim sjebavanjem dede, baba pokazala sposobnost da vodi svet usa... Ali izdao narod... Edited January 17, 2017 by wall
francuski sobar Posted January 17, 2017 Posted January 17, 2017 Da nije tramp tvitno ne bih znao ni za ovih pet iljada anđela pakla u maršu na Rim Ovo je sad nema spora Pure Putin.
Meazza Posted January 17, 2017 Posted January 17, 2017 (edited) Obama = Tadic. Lepo pakovanje ispod koga se krije potpuna nesadrzajnost, smooth talker koji ne donosi nikakvu promenu, istorijski beznacajni cul-de-sac i najveci uzrok sto je sada Tramp na vlasti. Mislim, podrzava babu koja ima taktiku da pogura Trampa kao GOP kandidata da bi onda narod izabrao manje zlo (na sta li me to podseca). Slicnosti su porazavajuce, a rezultat politike isti. Edited January 17, 2017 by IndridCold
porucnik vasic Posted January 17, 2017 Posted January 17, 2017 Slažem se, trebali bi vas poštediti tih trauma i ostavit vas da uživate ozbiljno raspravljajući s MNEom, urkozamanjem i ostalim prisutnim takojevićima i dubokoumnicima. Preklinjem ih da to i naprave. Ма тебе кад би нас поштедели па сунце да нас огреје.
Hella Posted January 17, 2017 Posted January 17, 2017 (edited) Obama = Tadic. Lepo pakovanje ispod koga se krije potpuna nesadrzajnost, smooth talker koji ne donosi nikakvu promenu, istorijski beznacajni cul-de-sac i najveci uzrok sto je sada Tramp na vlasti. ok znamo ko si menjaj nik To poređenje nije realno jer je Putin iznikao unutar sistema vlasti, a Tadić protiv njega. Ako već moram, Tadića bih uporedio s Barakom Obamom. Obama je čovek koji je mlad došao na funkciju, a sada može i da postane predsednik SAD. Slično se dogodilo i Tadiću, koji je za predsednika izabran u 45. godini, kao neko poznat široj javnosti tek godinu-dve. Edited January 17, 2017 by Hella
bradilko Posted January 17, 2017 Posted January 17, 2017 Slažem se, trebali bi vas poštediti tih trauma i ostavit vas da uživate ozbiljno raspravljajući s MNEom, urkozamanjem i ostalim prisutnim takojevićima i dubokoumnicima. Preklinjem ih da to i naprave. drven advokat.erasera ne dam.treba za mne. andurila nastavi da preklinjes.
frn1782 Posted January 17, 2017 Posted January 17, 2017 Tadic iznikao protiv sistema LOL Komunjarski mali plemic s taticom akademikom NOB pedigrea Eh te mukice disidentske mi kao vise nismo komunjare a oni nas se kao groze
Recommended Posts