Toni Sumaher Posted November 18, 2016 Posted November 18, 2016 (edited) Dok se tako veselo cerekas, procitaj u nekoj pauzici jos jednom sta zapravo ovde pise: Balkan nije zona prevelikog ruskog prisustva, ali sve snaznijeg uticaja svakako da. Mozda tu Rusi naprave ustupak. Pozicija Srbije je sada dodatno komplikovana zbog generalnog odnosa Trampa prema NATO i sleda desavanja u okviru EU. Po nekom scenariju, mozda bi mogao da se ubrza ulazak Srbije u EU uz smanjena uslovljavanja posebno oko priznanja Kosova i ulaska u NATO. Sledeci put cu da crtam, ok. Edited November 18, 2016 by Toni Sumaher
frn1782 Posted November 18, 2016 Posted November 18, 2016 (edited) Ako Trampovi neoconsi budu zeleli invaziju na Iran Rusija bi im tu samo prostrla crveni tepih. Buducnost EU penetracija je cak i van te Americko- Ruske paradigme. Treba sacekati pa videti sta izbori 2017. nose a i naravno da se uredi to postansko glasanje po Austrijama. Edited November 18, 2016 by frn1782
MancMellow Posted November 18, 2016 Posted November 18, 2016 Da, papa Franja nije endorsovao Traparu, ali je to učinio vodeći konzervativac Vatikana, kardinal Raymond Burke, koji je u sukobu sa papom po mnogim pitanjima Ono Benonovo gostovanje na skupu u Vatikanu 2014. gde je Irac izneo svoje političke poglede je organizovao upravo kardinal Burke... da, to je divna jedna klika Program Ponedjeljak, 24. listopada 2016. 19:00 sati službeno otvaranje, službeni pozdravi Canticorum jubilo, Georg Friedrich Handel Oratorijski zbor crkve Sv. Marka Cantores sancti Marci Pozdravni govor Hrabro promicati i braniti prokušano Dr. Vice John Batarelo Pozdrav Davor Ivo Stier Obrana kršćanskih načela u javnom životu: osvrt na pro-life kampanje u Poljskoj Sławomir Olejniczak Motet Ubi caritas, Maurice Durufle Oratorijski zbor crkve Sv. Marka Cantores sancti Marci Kratki uvod o kardinalu Raymondu Burkeu Don Damir Stojić Glavni govor Evanđelje života i nova evangelizacija Kardinal Raymond Leo Burke Utorak, 25. listopada 2016. 18:00 sati Između obrane tradicije i stvarnosti postmodernizma: Poljska i Švedska Obrana obitelji i života u suvremenoj Europi – poljsko iskustvo Dr. Aleksander Stepkowski Vrlo sekularna nacija Dr. Clemens Cavallin Okrugli stol Tradicionalno i konzervativno nasuprot militantnog sekularizma u Hrvatskoj i Europi Moderator: Hrvoje Serdarušić Hrvoje Zekanović Krešimir Planinić Dr. Stjepo Bartulica Dr. Luka Popov Dr. Vice Batarelo Srijeda, 26. listopada 2016. 18:00 sati Obrisi civilizacije smrti. Kako i zašto se suprotstaviti. Konačno suočavanje između Crkve i anti-Crkve John-Henry Westen Život, dakle, biraj! Inicijativa 40 dana za život Ante Čaljkušić Dodjela TradFest nagrade “Svjedok godine” Gospodin Ante Čaljkušić i Incijativa 40 dana za život Okrugli stol Do kada taj spolni odgoj i rodna ideologija u hrvatskim školama? Moderator: Ivan Mihanović Hrvoje Šlezak Krešimir Miletić Kristina Pavlović Ivan Prskalo Četvrtak, 27. listopada 2016. 18:00 sati Stepinac. Ime i pojam. Stepinac, čovjek, ime i nacija s kojim se još uvijek manipulira Don Markušić Zašto Stepinac nije kontroverzan? Dr. Jure Krišto Stepinac i njegova vremena Dr. Robin Harris http://www.tradfest.org/
Prospero Posted November 18, 2016 Posted November 18, 2016 Rep. Mike Pompeo of Kansas has been selected for CIA director. Retired Army Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn has been offered the job of national security advisor and Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions has been picked for attorney general. All three have accepted their offers. Mike Pompeo Michael Richard "Mike" Pompeo (born December 30, 1963) is an American politician who has been the U.S. Representative for Kansas's 4th congressional district since 2011. He is a member of the Tea Party movement within the Republican Party ... Pompeo is strongly opposed to abortion, except in cases when the mother's life is at risk. He does not support abortion in cases of rape and incest.... Pompeo rejects the scientific consensus on climate change. ... Pompeo opposes the Affordable Care Act. ... Pompeo is a lifetime member of the National Rifle Association, which has endorsed him. ... Pompeo supports the National Security Agency's surveillance programs, characterizing the agency's efforts as "good and important work." In March 2014, Pompeo denounced NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden's inclusion in the South by Southwest conference in Austin, Texas, and called for Snowden's invitation to speak via telecast at the annual Texas event be withdrawn, lest it encourage "lawless behavior" among attendees. In February 2016, Pompeo said Snowden "should be brought back from Russia and given due process, and I think the proper outcome would be that he would be given a death sentence." Pompeo has advocated for rolling back post-Snowden surveillance reforms, saying "Congress should pass a law re-establishing collection of all metadata, and combining it with publicly available financial and lifestyle information into a comprehensive, searchable database. Legal and bureaucratic impediments to surveillance should be removed. That includes Presidential Policy Directive-28, which bestows privacy rights on foreigners and imposes burdensome requirements to justify data collection." On July 21, 2015, Pompeo and Senator Tom Cotton alleged the existence of secret side agreements between Iran and the IAEA on procedures for inspection and verification of Iran's nuclear activities under the Iran nuclear deal. The Obama administration denied any clandestine or secret actions. On February 4, 2016, Pompeo, along with Frank LoBiondo (R-NJ) and Lee Zeldin (R-NY),applied for a visa to visit Iran, writing a letter to the Supreme Leader of Iran to facilitate the application process. In a 2013 speech on the House floor, Pompeo said Muslim leaders who fail to denounce acts of terrorism done in the name of Islam are "potentially complicit" in the attacks. The Council on American-Islamic Relations called on Pompeo to revise his remarks, calling them "false and irresponsible". Pompeo opposes closing Guantánamo Bay detention camp. After a 2013 visit to the prison, Pompeo said, of the prisoners who were on hunger strike, "It looked to me like a lot of them had put on weight."
porucnik vasic Posted November 18, 2016 Posted November 18, 2016 Dveri Теби баш фрка? Какве конгресмен из Канзаса има везе са Дверима?
ObiW Posted November 18, 2016 Posted November 18, 2016 Dok se tako veselo cerekas, procitaj u nekoj pauzici jos jednom sta zapravo ovde pise: Sledeci put cu da crtam, ok. aj uzmi bojice u ruke: . Mozda tu Rusi naprave ustupak. Pozicija Srbije je sada dodatno komplikovana zbog generalnog odnosa Trampa prema NATO i sleda desavanja u okviru EU. Po nekom scenariju, mozda bi mogao da se ubrza ulazak Srbije u EU uz smanjena uslovljavanja posebno oko priznanja Kosova i ulaska u NATO. Videcemo. U ovom sbbkbb u vezi Balkana Rusi prave ustupak, ne Amerikanci. Amerikanci su vec napravili ustupak oko politicki i vojno neutralne Ukrajine, sada im se Rusi revansiraju pa prave ustupak na Blakanu. Pitanje je kako Rusi prave ustupak, a ti kazes "uz smanjenja uslovljavanja oko priznanja Kosova i ulaska u NATO". sadasnji stav Rusije je - nema priznanja Kosova, nema ulaska u NATO. To je i stav Srbije. Kako si napisao u boldu ispada da smatras da bi mozda Rusija treba da olabavi taj uslov i da prizna Kosovo i odobri ulazak Srbije u NATO. Drugim recima, mozda bi se u dogovoru sa Amerikom, odrekla Srbije. Da te potsetim, moje prvo pitanje koje sam postavio svima je glasilo otprilike: da li bi ste bili za Srbiju koja bi, po dogovoru Amerike i Rusije, bila vojno i politicki neutralna, ali bez Kosova. To pitanje sam postavio jer je neko rekao da ce sada Tramp i Putin da se dogovore da Ukrajina bude politicki i vojno neutralna, podrazumeva se bez Krima. Kako si nacrtao, ispada da smatras da to nije moguce. Ajd sad polako crtaj...
frn1782 Posted November 18, 2016 Posted November 18, 2016 Ne znam samo odakle ti da su to stvari oko kojih ima biilo sta da se dogovara. Te stvari su za obe strane iz njihove vizure resene - i Krim i Kosovo I Amerima se yebe za Ruski stav po pitanju nezavisnosti i Rusima za zapadnjacki po pitanju ciji je Krim-realnos na terenu bato.
Desmond Bojčinski Posted November 18, 2016 Posted November 18, 2016 (edited) Ako Trampovi neoconsi budu zeleli invaziju na Iran Rusija bi im tu samo prostrla crveni tepih. I umesto da imaju jednu zemlju razdaljine, dozvolili haos reda velicine Avganistan + Iran direktno na granici Kavkazom? Ispravite me ako gresim, ali cini mi se da bi pre ponudili Kaljingrad Amerima za gradnju protivraketnog stita i poslali Ukrajinu u NATO. Edited November 18, 2016 by desboj
frn1782 Posted November 18, 2016 Posted November 18, 2016 I umesto da imaju jednu zemlju razdaljine, dozvolili haos reda velicine Avganistan + Iran direktno na granici Kavkazom? Ispravite me ako gresim, ali cini mi se da bi pre ponudili Kaljingrad Amerima za gradnju protivraketnog stita i poslali Ukrajinu u NATO. Iran bas nesto i nije u fokusu Kavkaza vise centralne Azije. Invazija zemlje triput vece od Iraka bi ekonomski sahranila SAD a verovatno i EU jer bi se bliski istok ceo nacisto raspao i krenuo u izbeglistvo. Na Iran moze da se krene kad se osigura zaledjina u Damasku i Bagdadu sto je i bio prvobitni plan ali kao sto vidimo stvari ne stoje bas ruzicasto.
Lord Protector Posted November 18, 2016 Posted November 18, 2016 (edited) da, to je divna jedna klika NATION | NOV. 9, 2016 Cardinal Burke: Trump’s Victory a Wake-Up Call to US Political Leaders The patron of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta said Catholics need to continue to make their presence felt in the election process. Edward Pentin VATICAN CITY — Cardinal Raymond Burke has said Donald Trump’s election Tuesday is a sign that the United States’ political leaders need to listen more to the people and return to safeguarding life, marriage, the family and religious liberty. In an exclusive interview with the Register Nov. 9, the patron of the Sovereign Order of Malta said he was confident Trump would be able to help heal divisions in the country, that he has a “great disposition” to listen to the Church’s position on the moral law, and hopes he will “follow the principles and dictates of our Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.” However, aware of inevitable areas of divergence with Church teaching, Cardinal Burke stressed the importance of Catholics continuing to make objections known whenever necessary. Your Eminence, what is your reaction to the news of Donald Trump’s election as U.S. president? I think that it is a clear sign of the will of the people. I understand that the voter turnout was stronger than usual, and I think that the American people have awoken to the really serious situation in which the country finds itself with regard to the common good, the fundamental goods that constitute the common good, whether it be the protection of human life itself, the integrity of marriage and the family or religious liberty. That a candidate like Donald Trump — who was completely out of the normal system of politics — could be elected is an indication that our political leaders need to listen more carefully to the people and, in my judgment, return to those fundamental principles that safeguard the common good that were so clearly enunciated at the foundation of the country in the Declaration of Independence and in the Constitution. You’d say the silent majority has spoken? Yes, that’s clear. Some are calling this a golden opportunity for the Church, particularly because of Trump’s position on life issues and religious freedom. Exactly; what he has said about pro-life issues, family issues and also issues regarding religious freedom shows a great disposition to hear the Church on these matters and to understand that these are fundamentally questions of the moral law, not questions of religious confession. They are questions of the moral law, which religion in the country, as the Founding Fathers understood from the start, is meant to support and to sustain. The government needs the help of religious leadership in order to hold to an ethical norm. Do you think he’s authentic when he talks about these issues? Recently, for example, some were concerned that he waved a pro-homosexual rainbow flag at a rally. Of course, after any election, this is the big question: Will the candidate be true to his word, follow through? We have to hope and pray that he does that. One thing I heard about him is that he tends to associate himself with very sound advisers, and I would trust that he will do that. He appointed 34 prominent Catholics during the campaign to advise him on Church issues. Yes, some of them are well-known to me, and they are very fine people. It is a hopeful sign. His election also means it’s practically inevitable that the contraceptive mandate that the Obama administration tried to impose on EWTN and other Catholic organizations will be overturned. I certainly hope so, because that’s certainly a question of a fundamental right of conscience. I trust that he will address the many moral problems with the health care mandate that was pushed during these last eight years. In the lead-up to the election, 35 prominent Catholics signed an open letter before he was nominated, saying that Trump is “manifestly unfit to be president of the United States.” They said: “His campaign has already driven our politics down to new levels of vulgarity. His appeals to racial and ethnic fears and prejudice are offensive to any genuinely Catholic sensibility. He promised to order U.S. military personnel to torture terrorist suspects and to kill terrorists’ families — actions condemned by the Church and policies that would bring shame upon our country.” Should Catholics still be wary of these concerns? Certainly, we must be alert to them, as we would be to any U.S. president, and be attentive to insist on what’s morally right. But I think a Catholic could, in good conscience, vote for Donald Trump because, in all that he said, at least there was a hope of advancing in some way the common good of the nation. But on these objectionable issues, when one votes in conscience for a candidate with whom one doesn’t share all the same moral principles, but certainly very important ones, then one makes clear his or her objections on positions that the candidate may have that are not correct. But on the key one, the life one, although there were some earlier concerns (he had been pro-abortion rights in the past), he seems to be right? Yes, on the life issue, he’s right on the money. What about immigration, where his views diverge with the common position taken by U.S. bishops? Pope Francis also said, in comments perceived as criticism of Trump’s plan to build a wall on the Mexican-U.S. border to keep out illegal immigrants, that we should build bridges rather than walls. I don’t think the new president will be inspired by hatred in his treatment of the issue of immigration. These are prudential questions — of how much immigration a country can responsibly sustain, also what is the meaning of immigration, and if the immigrants are coming from one country — questions that principally address that country’s responsibility for its own citizens. Those are all questions that have to be addressed, and, certainly, the bishops of the United States have addressed them consistently, and I’m sure they will with him, too. He has these Catholic advisers; and at least some of them, I know, are very well aware of these questions, and I can’t imagine that they’re not speaking up. A Christian cannot close his heart to a true refugee, this is an absolute principle, there’s no question about it, but it should be done with prudence and true charity. Charity is always intelligent; it demands to know: Exactly who are these immigrants? Are they really refugees, and what communities can sustain them? What is your opinion regarding other accusations of divisiveness and lowering the tone of political debate and culture? Some, particularly in the Clinton campaign, blamed Trump for that. I don’t think that at all. I think the campaign itself, and that means both parties, contributed to that, and I believe, from what I’ve heard him say, although I didn’t hear his acceptance speech, that he will work to unify the country. But it has to be a unity that’s on a solid foundation, namely those moral principles that have to guide the life of a nation. So I believe that he will do that. I mean, you have to imagine, he’s not a stupid man; he realizes that it’s one thing to run for president, but it’s another thing to become the president, and that will certainly be in his mind — the heavy responsibility that he has, that’s on his shoulders. Another fear that arose during the campaign, heightened by Trump’s opponents, was that giving him the nuclear codes would be dangerous. I’m not afraid of this. I think the new president, in the long tradition of American presidents, will follow the way of cooperation and communication with foreign powers, and I highly doubt he will be able to take any unilateral action that would endanger the world. I am convinced he will deal with other countries on a wider variety of foreign-policy issues. Overall, what are your hopes for this new presidency? I hope that Trump will follow the principles and dictates of our Declaration of Independence and the Constitution — certainly, that he will turn out to be a good president and heal the divisions in the country (in fact, he has already said that it is a time not to be divisive) and that, therefore, there will be unconditional understanding, that is, unity among all American citizens. Edward Pentin is the Register’s Rome correspondent. Edited November 18, 2016 by slow
Dr Arslanagić Posted November 18, 2016 Posted November 18, 2016 Hoće li biti nekog uhlebljenja za Kruza? Upravnik vodovoda? Ambasador u Džibutiju?
3opge Posted November 18, 2016 Posted November 18, 2016 Hoće li biti nekog uhlebljenja za Kruza? Upravnik vodovoda? Ambasador u Džibutiju? Ministar za antiabortiranje
Budja Posted November 18, 2016 Posted November 18, 2016 To bi bilo iznenađenje, u negativnom smislu Apprentice - Secretary of State Romni Petraus Flin Bolton Gingric Djulijani Korker .... Nastavi niz. Stampa dize tiraz.
Recommended Posts