Dr Arslanagić Posted November 10, 2016 Posted November 10, 2016 Juče se 100.000 ljudi prijavilo za Obamacare. :0.6:
Miralem Posted November 10, 2016 Author Posted November 10, 2016 Pa nisu baš poljubile vrata prošle godine stotine hiljada ljudi koji npr sad žive u Nemačkoj, njima nije isto. Da, ali ovo je ipak druga tema. Tj možeš da dovedeš nekoga ko će da nastavi da pravi ratove i neće ni onih par promila ljudi koje je unesrećio da zbrine. ali mi ne pricamo o merkelki i nemackoj, nego trampu, hilari i usa. nijedno od njih dvoje ne bi sirom otvorilo vrata izbeglicama i ostalim meksikancima, jedino sto tramp to otvoreno kaze. ako je to toliki problem i svi zelimo da budemo licimuri koji bi radije da se izbeglice drze napolju ali nekako suptilno ako je moguce, onda ok. plus mene iskreno zabole sto ce se jadni afromeksikanci malo teze svercovati da bi radili na crno, ja se vise brinem oko ratova i propratnih pojava. za sada izgleda da ih tramp nece proizvoditi, a ubedjen sam da bi to sa hilari bio slucaj. cim krene da joj pada popularnost. pa sad ne znam sta je tu bitnije.
Meazza Posted November 10, 2016 Posted November 10, 2016 (edited) Ja mislim da postoji 5% sanse da Tramp ne nastavi jastrepskutm spoljnu politiku. Sa Hilari je taj procenat 0.0%, ergo Trampara je preferabilniji in my book, pa makar uveo policijski cas u svom dvoristu. Edited November 10, 2016 by IndridCold
Eraserhead Posted November 10, 2016 Posted November 10, 2016 (edited) Miralem, Koliko samo nista ne kapiras. Postoji nesto izmedju "sirom otvorenih vrata" i "zidanja zida". Sto se ratova tice Trampova potencijalno meksa pozicija prema Putinu ne znaci obavezno manju upasnost od rata vec moze znaciti i vecu kao sto je objasnjeno ovde: http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/11179774? Uostalom pricamo o neuracunljivom coveku koji vodi ratove na twitteru u 3 ujutro. I na kraju ne radi se tu ni samo o Rusiji vec o tome da li ce ovo dovesti do ekspanzije terorizma, potencijalnog zaostravanja odnosa sa Kinom ili Iranom itd. Edited November 10, 2016 by Eraserhead
Weenie Pooh Posted November 10, 2016 Posted November 10, 2016 (edited) Ajde ovo ostalo, ali kako bi trebalo da izbor Trampa dovede do ekspanzije terorizma? Jel' to verujemo da su dosadašnji "čvrsta ruka" pristup i doktrina globalnog intervencionizma bili uspešni deterrents, pa će zlikovci sad da se opuste u (vrlo malo verovatnom) slučaju da DT ne nastavi da im sipa bombe po glavama? Da li bi HRC bila nekakav garant mira i stabilnosti na planu terorizma? Edited November 10, 2016 by Weenie Pooh
hazard Posted November 10, 2016 Posted November 10, 2016 Koliko samo nista ne kapiras. Postoji nesto izmedju "sirom otvorenih vrata" i "zidanja zida". Sto se ratova tice Trampova potencijalno meksa pozicija prema Putinu ne znaci obavezno manju upasnost od rata vec moze znaciti i vecu kao sto je objasnjeno ovde: http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/11179774? A moze znaciti i milion drugih stvari. Mis'im ovaj paragraf: The number of possible scenarios are infinite due to the massive complexity of the many moving parts. And of course many of them lead to nothing happening. But based on history we are due another period of destruction, and based on history all the indicators are that we are entering one. boldovani deo je totalni bullshit. Prve dve recenice medjutim, su tacne. I tu je trebalo da stane
Weenie Pooh Posted November 10, 2016 Posted November 10, 2016 Based on history, we are due a supervolcano eruption. Javi se Yellowstone.
frn1782 Posted November 10, 2016 Posted November 10, 2016 http://news.groopspeak.com/breaking-trump-considering-sarah-palin-for-top-cabinet-position/ lol
Prospero Posted November 10, 2016 Posted November 10, 2016 based on theory of complexity any prediction is futile
Eraserhead Posted November 10, 2016 Posted November 10, 2016 Ajde ovo ostalo, ali kako bi trebalo da izbor Trampa dovede do ekspanzije terorizma? Jel' to verujemo da su dosadašnji "čvrsta ruka" pristup i doktrina globalnog intervencionizma bili uspešni deterrents, pa će zlikovci sad da se opuste u (vrlo malo verovatnom) slučaju da DT ne nastavi da im sipa bombe po glavama? Da li bi HRC bila nekakav garant mira i stabilnosti na planu terorizma? Antimuslimansko raspolozenje ide direktno na ruku teroristima. To je osnova za regrutovanje. Posebno sto ce ID u narednim mesecima da padne i hiljade bradonja ce da se razmile po svetu.
hazard Posted November 10, 2016 Posted November 10, 2016 evo i nesto pametno sa Huff Posta http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/james-di-fiore/clinton-supporters-enabled_b_12894806.html Clinton Supporters Enabled Trump's Victory You can't bully people to vote against a bully. Probably the most surreal facet of this election was listening to people expose themselves as the guardians of good behaviour as they shamed men and women into voting for a person whose ethics were eroded with every leaked document, every false statement she made. The snickering of Hillary Clinton voters in the run-up to the election was just as gross as a close-up of Donald Trump's pasty liver lips, while their words were just as ridiculous, just as slanderous. "A vote for Trump is a vote for misogyny" is not an honest or effective way to sway somebody to your camp. It was not just an attempt to repudiate the republican candidate; it was a message soaked in a superiority complex dressed up as political savvy and delivered by messengers who seemed to all stop taking their anxiety meds after the primary was over. They are a posse of frantic doomsday preachers whose empty rhetoric helped cement the Trump presidency, and now that he has won they are doubling down by protesting democracy itself. Meanwhile, the one group of voters who actually have legit reasons to hit the streets against injustice are the ones being blamed for snatching victory from the democrats. Entitlement doesn't even begin to describe Clinton and her stable of hyper-charged supporters, the loyalty so visceral and potent that actual evidence of subverting the primary process was brushed aside as a normal part of crowning a nominee. This goes well beyond cognitive dissonance; this was a display of pathological indifference and rabid entitlement where the offenders were acting like the offended, the bullies acting like victims, as they pranced around campaign offices like giddy little know-it-alls assigned to protect America from the Orange Godzilla and his apocalyptic vision.
Prospero Posted November 10, 2016 Posted November 10, 2016 http://news.groopspeak.com/breaking-trump-considering-sarah-palin-for-top-cabinet-position/ lol
MancMellow Posted November 10, 2016 Posted November 10, 2016 based on theory of complexity any prediction is futile ali ne izgleda baš dobro. ne da bi izgledalo super sa clinton. mislim, pravićemo Obamu od blata to svakako. Jer, što se tiče USofA, možda su "liberalni imperijalisti" izgubili, ali ko god misli da su došle mede i zeke nije normalan.
Meazza Posted November 10, 2016 Posted November 10, 2016 Posebno sto ce ID u narednim mesecima da padne i hiljade bradonja ce da se razmile po svetu. :ziga:
hazard Posted November 10, 2016 Posted November 10, 2016 based on theory of complexity any prediction is futile brate, clanak nije nikakva analiza nego bla bla bla trla baba lan, covek je jednostavno lose raspolozen sto je dobio Tramp, a to na kraju u sustini i sam kaze: So I feel it’s all inevitable. I don’t know what it will be, but we are entering a bad phase. Nema tu ozbiljnog promisljanja, samo weltschmerz. A inace je u svojoj briljantnoj analizi rekao da je Franc Ferdinand bio "minor European royal" :D da li bi isto rekao za Princa Carlsa? i onda (Perhaps I’m just writing this so I can be remembered by history as one of the people who saw it coming.) OK, so I'm gonna say it's gonna be all bad, mmkay? 'Cause it could be all bad, right. It always could be. So if it ends-up-a bein' all-bad, I'mma gonna be so smart! s-m-r-t!
Recommended Posts