i chelsea je imao laganiji raspored u prva tri kola, pri tome, prve dve utakmice su bile lose a ovo prekjuce odlicno.

 

marcos alonso izgleda potpisuje.

 

Zanimljiv članak u guardianu - exposing the widely held myths about how clubs sign players

 

Meni najinteresantniji delovi:

- Despite the nonsense you may have heard about Zlatan Ibrahimovic shirt sales generating £50m for Manchester United, which would far exceed his wages, it’s simply not true. At best, United are likely to see around £3m in additional revenue

- With Mkhitaryan costing Manchester United £8.75m per year in amortisation and £9.36m in wages (£180,000 per week multiplied by 52 weeks), his overall cost to the club is just over £18.1m per year

- While the transfer fees for Mkhitaryan and Xhaka are similar, Mkhitaryan is costing Manchester United 50% more than Xhaka is costing Arsenal on an annual basis.

To further illustrate why net spend doesn’t tell you anything about how clubs do business, consider United’s signing of Zlatan Ibrahimovic on a free transfer. While the “net spend” on that deal is zero, he adds well over £10m to Manchester United’s player costs this year. If those were the only transactions United and Arsenal made this summer, their “net spend” figures would be similar (£35m and £30m, respectively). However, after applying the business and accounting principles that the clubs themselves use, we see that Arsenal added £12m to its total player costs for the coming season, while United added over £28m. Rather than a difference of less than 20% in actual spending (which is what net spend would show), the actual difference is over 200%.

 

 

 

To kad nadjes nekog neutralnog koji 1) ne pise potpuno ocigledne stvari kao da otkriva ne znam koje istine 2) ume da pise o jos nekome osim o arsenalu i unitedu

 

 

Zanimljiv članak u guardianu - exposing the widely held myths about how clubs sign players

 

Meni najinteresantniji delovi:

- Despite the nonsense you may have heard about Zlatan Ibrahimovic shirt sales generating £50m for Manchester United, which would far exceed his wages, it’s simply not true. At best, United are likely to see around £3m in additional revenue

- With Mkhitaryan costing Manchester United £8.75m per year in amortisation and £9.36m in wages (£180,000 per week multiplied by 52 weeks), his overall cost to the club is just over £18.1m per year

- While the transfer fees for Mkhitaryan and Xhaka are similar, Mkhitaryan is costing Manchester United 50% more than Xhaka is costing Arsenal on an annual basis.

To further illustrate why net spend doesn’t tell you anything about how clubs do business, consider United’s signing of Zlatan Ibrahimovic on a free transfer. While the “net spend” on that deal is zero, he adds well over £10m to Manchester United’s player costs this year. If those were the only transactions United and Arsenal made this summer, their “net spend” figures would be similar (£35m and £30m, respectively). However, after applying the business and accounting principles that the clubs themselves use, we see that Arsenal added £12m to its total player costs for the coming season, while United added over £28m. Rather than a difference of less than 20% in actual spending (which is what net spend would show), the actual difference is over 200%.

 

 

 

Topla voda.

 

Plate su trosak!

Vazna je duzina ugovora!

Ma znam, sprdam se zbog onih sektaških fazona da je zlaja zaradio 900 milijardi miliona od dresova, a adm još toliko od fakin maski :)

Jel moguće da ćelavi prepotenko tera kapitena i golmana reprezentacije u jedan Torino? Pa šta je taj umislio jbt

Nije moguće. U torino ga tera želja da redovno brani i nedostatak kvaliteta da to radi u jačem klubu.

Prepotenku ništa nije smeto

Koji random transfer, kao nesto iz osamdesetih. 

 

Svaka cas njemu na avanturizmu, a i Torinu na ambiciji. Jedino sto imam osjecaj da ce i tamo zavrsiti na klupi posle izvjesnog vremena..

Englezi mi nisu jasni, pa nije Hartara bilo ko. Kako mu nisu našli nešto u Premieru, ili bar u Bundesligi

 

Ode im zaštitino lice reprezentacije da se potuca po oronulim polupraznim stadionima u Sasuolu, Kievo Veroni itd

Ode im zaštitino lice reprezentacije

 

Nije, još je tu:

Nije, još je tu:

 

 

+1

 

jos fali gaskojn.

Pa ako Bravo dolazi u MC, onda Hart svakako treba da ide. Da li je za bolji klub od Torina, nije tema za Pepa.

fali i Cantona

 

 

 

...poslato sa prinudnog...

Klop tera Sakoa na pozajmicu inače neće igrati za Liverpul ove sezone

A debeli Sam zove Antonia u reprezentaciju...pogađate da to nije zato što je fasciniran njegovim učinkom na desnom beku.