Eraserhead Posted October 5, 2016 Posted October 5, 2016 Najzanimljivije je da je Pence po mnogim stavovima, a posebno u oblasti spoljne politike odstuipio od Trampove dosadasnje price. Udari na Asada, razmestanje raketa po evropi itd.
Budja Posted October 5, 2016 Posted October 5, 2016 Najzanimljivije je da je Pence po mnogim stavovima, a posebno u oblasti spoljne politike odstuipio od Trampove dosadasnje price. Udari na Asada, razmestanje raketa po evropi itd. O, da. The Russian bear never dies, it just hibernates. A, Erase, moglo bi se glasati za Tramparu, vidi kako Pensara vise mrzi Putina od Hilari?
Eraserhead Posted October 5, 2016 Posted October 5, 2016 O, da. The Russian bear never dies, it just hibernates. A, Erase, moglo bi se glasati za Tramparu, vidi kako Pensara vise mrzi Putina od Hilari? Ne vredi, drago mi je da popravljaju stav po tom pitanju ali ostatak price mi nije blizak.
Gandalf Posted October 5, 2016 Posted October 5, 2016 Mike Pence Won The Debate For His Imaginary Running Mate, Mitt Romney
Gandalf Posted October 5, 2016 Posted October 5, 2016 Naravno, GOP banda to zna i pustit će ga da se kuha u vlastitom sosu, uz podmetanje klipa gdje stignu
Budja Posted October 5, 2016 Posted October 5, 2016 Mike Pence Won The Debate For His Imaginary Running Mate, Mitt Romney Upravo tako.
Eraserhead Posted October 6, 2016 Posted October 6, 2016 Reich malo dramatican: Robert Reich I continue to hear from many of you who say you won’t vote for Hillary Clinton because, you claim (1) she’s no better than Donald Trump, or (2) even if she’s better, she’s still corrupt, and you refuse to vote for the “lesser of two evils,” or (3) you don’t want to reward the Democratic Party for corrupt primaries that gave the nomination to Hillary instead of Bernie Sanders. Please allow me to respond. 1. Anyone who equates Donald Trump with Hillary Clinton hasn’t been paying attention. Trump is a dangerous, bigoted, narcissistic megalomaniac with fascist tendencies who could wreak huge damage on America and the world. Hillary isn’t perfect but she’s able and experienced. There is simply no comparison. 2. Even if you see Hillary Clinton as the “lesser of two evils,” the greater of two evils in this case is seriously evil. Voting for someone who doesn’t meet your ideals -- when the alternative is someone who falls much further from those ideals -- doesn’t mean you’ve sold out or compromised your principles. You’re just being realistic and practical. Realism and practicality are critically important now. 3. I understand your frustration with the Democratic Party, and your reluctance to “reward” it for its bias against Bernie in the primaries. But anything you do that increases the odds of a Trump presidency isn’t just penalizing the Democratic Party; it’s jeopardizing our future and that of our children and their children. All of us have to continue to work hard for a political system and an economy responsive to the needs of ordinary Americans. The movement Bernie energized must not and will not end. But Donald Trump, were he to become president, would set back that cause for decades. There are fewer than 5 weeks until Election Day. My request to those of you who still don’t want to vote for Hillary Clinton: Please reconsider. It is no exaggeration to say the fate of the nation and the world are at stake.
Weenie Pooh Posted October 6, 2016 Posted October 6, 2016 (edited) Won't somebody think of da children Meni je neobično kad neko iznese primedbu da neće da glasa za lesser evil iz principa, zato što misli da je to štetno na duge staze, zato što se tako dublje ukorenjuje sistem koji ignoriše svoje birače i preti im novim strašilom svakih par godina... a onda mu se iznese odgovor "Ali sad treba biti pragmatičan, jel' vidiš ti kako je strašno ovo strašilo?" To nije odgovor. Zašto ne pokušaju da ospore te principe kojih bernielistićari kažu da se pridržavaju, umesto što odvrću strah na 11 i duvaju u istu tikvu? Mislim, nisu to neki savršeni i neoborivi teorijski principi, ali ne pamtim da sam video da neko pokušava da ih obori u vezi sa ovim izborima. Valjda se uzdaju u to da je "ali Trump!" dovoljan argument za dovoljan broj ljudi. Edited October 6, 2016 by Weenie Pooh
Venom Posted October 6, 2016 Posted October 6, 2016 Ne mogu da ponude nesto drugo, zato sto nemaju da ponude nesto drugo.
Ariel Posted October 6, 2016 Posted October 6, 2016 hahah nema niže mada to ti je u stvari dej tu dej džob kongresmena i senatora https://www.termlimits.org/congress-fundraising-priority/
Prospero Posted October 6, 2016 Posted October 6, 2016 “I don’t care how sick you are,” Trump said at a rally in Henderson, Nevada. “I don’t care if you just came back from the doctor and he gave you the worst possible prognosis, meaning it’s over, you won’t be around in two weeks. Doesn’t matter. Hang out till Nov. 8. Get out and vote.” skot mada je sreća sreća radost gledati gopere kako pokušavaju da našminkaju svinju.
ObiW Posted October 6, 2016 Posted October 6, 2016 Hillary vs. the Hate Machine: How Clinton Became a Vessel for America's Fury That Clinton has been held to a higher, and often altogether different, benchmark is both "shocking in 2016" and also not surprising, says Abramson, who, as the first female editor of the Times was perceived as "pushy" and later fired in part over a pay dispute in which Abramson argued her compensation was less than that of her male predecessor. "When a woman achieves the top position in an important American institution, clichés like 'too ambitious' and 'shrill' easily get applied," she says. "Where, when a man exhibits those traits, it's seen as a sign of leadership." With Clinton, she adds, it's very telling that when she left her job as secretary of state, 69 percent of Americans approved of her, the second-highest rating recorded in history. "She was an international and national icon," says Abramson. "But she was subordinate to Obama." Once Clinton announced her intention to run for president, her poll numbers took a dive of more than 10 points. .. "With Hillary, everything she does is either different from what men do and it's 'wrong,' or it's the same thing that men do and that's 'wrong,'" says Robin Lakoff, a professor emeritus of linguistics at U.C. Berkeley. "And that's because the underlying thing about Clinton and her candidacy is it's not normal. Normal is a male candidate, a male voice, a male tie." ... We live in an era of dire straits and instant gratification, which is why a boorish billionaire was able to say, "Build a wall!" and millions cheered and nominated him for president. But long before all of that, in the pre-recession era, before 9/11 and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, everything felt vastly different, with one crucial exception: the national discomfort with Hillary Clinton and everything she represents, which is strong and unequivocal female leadership. The nativist politics represented by the candidacy of Donald Trump did not happen in a vacuum – nor did the ferocious attacks on Hillary Clinton. If she loses, says the Berkeley linguist Robin Lakoff, "The line will be, 'A woman can't win.'" The majority of activists in both political parties, she notes, are men, "and an awful lot of them are not enthusiastic for a woman. Hillary Clinton pulled it off by God knows how many years of steely determination. She is not 'inevitable.' She has been running this race since 1992." ... http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/how-hillary-clinton-became-a-vessel-for-americas-fury-w440914
Budja Posted October 6, 2016 Posted October 6, 2016 Hillary vs. the Hate Machine: How Clinton Became a Vessel for America's Fury .. ... ... http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/how-hillary-clinton-became-a-vessel-for-americas-fury-w440914 "With Hillary, everything she does is either different from what men do and it's 'wrong,' or it's the same thing that men do and that's 'wrong,'" says Robin Lakoff, a professor emeritus of linguistics at U.C. Berkeley. "And that's because the underlying thing about Clinton and her candidacy is it's not normal. Normal is a male candidate, a male voice, a male tie." 1 objektivan akademski sud.... not. http://robinlakoff.com/aboutme/ Dave feministkinje, vrsnjakinje Hilari sa tom gender bias pricom. Ok, Hilari predstavlja simbolicku pobedu za vasu generaciju feminista, sve je to ok, ali ne generalizujte. While I and many other women in my demographic (older, professional, liberal) are likely to vote for Obama in November, our feelings about his party (and ours) are not so clear. We remember the perpetual misogyny and sexism of the media during the primary campaign - misogyny aimed less at Hillary Rodham Clinton herself than at "uppity women" (like ourselves) in general. And many of us feel that the Democratic Party is even more to blame than the media. Let me mention a couple of reasons why I am thinking this way: First, of course, is the failure of the party leaders to comment on the sexism rampant in the media, especially the liberal media, for months on end.Second - and this factor bothers me, and no doubt others, perhaps the most: Why did the superdelegates move in such numbers to support Obama? Why did this occur, especially after Clinton victories? For example, I am thinking here of Robert Byrd. After Clinton's impressive victory in West Virginia, the senator and elder statesman representing that state came out in support of Obama. Because the superdelegates were created to ensure that the Democratic candidate be a centrist, why did so many superdelegates - including liberals and many women - support Obama? Two arguments were made: They wished to follow the will of the people in their district; and they believed that Obama was more electable. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2053210/posts
Recommended Posts