Budja Posted October 3, 2016 Posted October 3, 2016 Otpusteni s posla. Neizbaceni iz Velikog brata. Sent from my MotoG3 using Tapatalk Je l opet da kacim i one koji su otpusteni sa posla, ali u drugom kontekstu?
Gandalf Posted October 3, 2016 Posted October 3, 2016 Je l opet da kacim i one koji su otpusteni sa posla, ali u drugom kontekstu? Analysis: 'Celebrity Apprentice' Ratings Surge Since Trump Beat Birther Drum
Budja Posted October 3, 2016 Posted October 3, 2016 Analysis: 'Celebrity Apprentice' Ratings Surge Since Trump Beat Birther Drum sto je dokaz cega? "Birther" ipad nije rasizam, niti sam ja govorio o rejtinzima vec o posledicama za rasiste.
Gandalf Posted October 3, 2016 Posted October 3, 2016 (edited) "Birther" ipad nije rasizam, niti sam ja govorio o rejtinzima vec o posledicama za rasiste. posledice za rasiste: ovakve kontroverze nekima (u ovom slucaju, Trampu) nisu stetile, mogu cak i da pomognu. npr. Dzastinu Biberu ce nekakva kontroverza napraviti znacajnu stetu, coveku koji vodi velikog brata ce povecati rejting. a ceo taj pokret oko Obaminog mesta rodjenja je bio rasisticki. Obamin otac crnac iz Kenije, srednje ime Husein... edit: što i ne mora van svake sumnje da dokaže da je Tramp žaba. ali skakuće i krekeće kao oni. Edited October 3, 2016 by Gandalf
Budja Posted October 3, 2016 Posted October 3, 2016 posledice za rasiste: ovakve kontroverze nekima (u ovom slucaju, Trampu) nisu stetile, mogu cak i da pomognu. npr. Dzastinu Biberu ce nekakva kontroverza napraviti znacajnu stetu, coveku koji vodi velikog brata ce povecati rejting. a ceo taj pokret oko Obaminog mesta rodjenja je bio rasisticki. Obamin otac crnac iz Kenije, srednje ime Husein... edit: što i ne mora van svake sumnje da dokaže da je Tramp žaba. ali skakuće i krekeće kao oni. Dobro, de, "birther" pokret se moze interpretirati kao rasistick ali nije nikakav direktan dokazz rasizma. Stoga i nije dobar primer kao i ona epizoda iz Apprentice koju Vox citira kao rasisticku. Da je Trump, fair and square, uradio ili izjavio nesto rasisticki The Apprentice bi u roku od odmah bio skinut sa programa. I ti i Rodja znate to vrlo dobro.
Weenie Pooh Posted October 3, 2016 Posted October 3, 2016 Ne znam baš kakvo otvoreno rasističku izjavu možeš da očekuješ u kontekstu Apprenticea. Trumpov rasizam je salonske sorte, nema on ništa protiv crnih, smeđih, i ostalih rasa, samo duboko u sebi oseća da je njegova narandžasta bolja i prosvećenija od svih ostalih, zato drugima i dozvoljava da čiste toalete. Implicitni rasizam je bio i ostao košer u USA. A za Birther Movement je Gandalf u pravu, to se oslanja na onu najdublju esenciju rasizma kod ljudi, tvrdoglavo se insistira na otherness pojedinca i imaginarnoj rasnoj čistoći zajednice. Opet, verujem da Trump privatno ne deli konkretno te stavove ali mu je zgodno bilo da ih se lati i krene da privlači pažnju medija.
Budja Posted October 3, 2016 Posted October 3, 2016 Ne znam baš kakvo otvoreno rasističku izjavu možeš da očekuješ u kontekstu Apprenticea. Trumpov rasizam je salonske sorte, nema on ništa protiv crnih, smeđih, i ostalih rasa, samo duboko u sebi oseća da je njegova narandžasta bolja i prosvećenija od svih ostalih, zato drugima i dozvoljava da čiste toalete. Implicitni rasizam je bio i ostao košer u USA. A za Birther Movement je Gandalf u pravu, to se oslanja na onu najdublju esenciju rasizma kod ljudi, tvrdoglavo se insistira na otherness pojedinca i imaginarnoj rasnoj čistoći zajednice. Opet, verujem da Trump privatno ne deli konkretno te stavove ali mu je zgodno bilo da ih se lati i krene da privlači pažnju medija. Onakve seksisticke kakve daje dok se ne snima i kakve su danas objavljene. Sto se drugog pasusa tice, opet vidim da ste pobrkali loncice. Prikriven rasizam ne sporim, sporim da je to otvoreni rasizam. Za prikriveni rasizam mozes da se vadis, za otvoreni ne. Stoga, posledice otvorenog i prikrivenog rasizma za one koje ih ispoljavaju nisu iste.
Eraserhead Posted October 3, 2016 Posted October 3, 2016 (edited) Izgleda da ipak postopji granica do koje moze da se lupeta: Clinton up 6 in POLITICO/Morning Consult national poll Hillary Clinton has opened up a six-point lead over Donald Trump, erasing the New York billionaire's slim national edge with five weeks until Election Day, according to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll of likely voters. Clinton leads Trump 42-36 in the four-way race for the White House. Gary Johnson garnered 9 percent, Jill Stein got 2 percent and 10 percent remain undecided. It's a dramatic bump for Clinton: Trump led by one point before the debate, and in a POLITICO/Morning Consult survey conducted immediately after the debate, Clinton led by four points. In a head-to-head race between Trump and Clinton, Clinton leads by seven points, 46 percent to 39 percent. Clinton's lead comes at the tail end of a particularly tough week for Trump. His debate performance was uneven and widely panned by Republicans and Democrats alike. He then spent a few days chiding Alicia Machado, a former Miss Universe, for gaining weight nearly two decades ago. The episode broke through — 74 percent heard of Trump’s comments about Machado — and it appears to have hurt Trump's standing with women. Fifty-five percent of women said it gives them a less favorable view of Trump, and 43 percent of voters said the incident makes them less likely to support Trump. As the week came to a close, Trump called the New York Times to suggest that he was considering spending more time attacking his opponent for Bill Clinton's infidelity in the White House. But, according to the POLITICO/Morning Consult poll, there's peril in that approach. Fifty-six percent of voters say it would be inappropriate to bring up Clinton's affairs. Sixty-two percent of females say it would be inappropriate. Sixty percent said it's inappropriate to discuss the other candidate's spouse. Both Trump and Clinton will hit the campaign trail Monday morning, with Trump in Pueblo and Loveland, Colorado, and Clinton in Toledo and Akron, Ohio. They don't meet for another head-to-head matchup until Sunday's debate at Washington University in St. Louis. But the vice presidential candidates will go head to head on Tuesday evening at Longwood University in Farmville, Virginia. Most voters say they will watch the contest, but few have expectations about who will prevail. Sixty-eight percent of those polled said it was very likely or somewhat likely they'd tune in to the debate. But 52 percent say they don't know or don't have an opinion on who will win. Clinton is widely expected to win the next debate on Oct. 9 — 44 percent of those polled said the former secretary of state would best Trump, while just 22 percent said Trump would prevail. Whoever wins the election in November will be facing a public that's deeply concerned about the nation's safety. Fifty-six percent of those polled say it's somewhat or very likely there will be a terrorist attack in the United States over the next few months. The online poll of 1,991 likely voters was conducted between Sept. 30 and Oct. 2, and has a margin of error of 2 percentage points. Edited October 3, 2016 by Eraserhead
Lezilebovich Posted October 3, 2016 Posted October 3, 2016 https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/782906224937410562
Eraserhead Posted October 3, 2016 Posted October 3, 2016 https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/782906224937410562 During a sit down interview with CBS News, a Clinton aide notified the room during a taping break of news reports that Gaddafi had been dragged throughout the streets of Libya and ultimately killed. Cisto istine radi, ovaj lik nikada nije bio njen pomocnik ili savetnik. Wiki ponavlja to vec par puta.
Eraserhead Posted October 3, 2016 Posted October 3, 2016 Bernie doubles down. Guest view: Clinton gets it, Trump doesn't Too many in the media treat the presidential contest like “Dancing with the Stars" or a World Series contest. It's not. The decision Iowans face is not whether you like Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump. It's not about who is ahead in the polls or who said something dumb yesterday. This enormously important election is about you and your family and what happens to us all over the next four years. As Iowans well know, Hillary Clinton and I had some very vigorous debates. We do not agree on every issue. But there is no question that she is, far and away, the superior candidate in this election. That is why I intend to work as hard as I can to see that she is elected and Trump is defeated. At a time of massive income and wealth inequality, we must not elect a president who wants to resurrect failed trickle-down economics. When the very rich are becoming much richer and there has been a ten-fold increase in the number of billionaires since the year 2000, it is economic insanity for Trump to propose hundreds of billions in tax breaks to the top 1 percent. His plan to scrap the estate tax would provide a $53 billion tax break to the Walton family of Wal-Mart, the wealthiest family in America. Who else would benefit? Trump’s own family would get a $4 billion tax break. While millions of Americans work longer hours for lower wages, it is beyond belief that any serious candidate would support huge tax breaks for the top 1 percent while cutting services to millions of families. But Trump would throw 20 million Americans off of health insurance by repealing the Affordable Care Act. He also has proposed large cuts in education, housing, childcare, veterans’ health care and other initiatives. Trump talks a great deal about our trade policies and outsourcing American jobs, but his own clothing line is manufactured in Bangladesh, Mexico and China. How can Trump, with a straight face, object to corporate outsourcing while his own company exploits some of the lowest-paid labor on earth to make his ties, shirts and other products? Unlike Trump, Clinton supports raising the minimum wage to a living wage and pay equity for women. She has a very specific plan to rebuild our crumbling infrastructure and create millions of decent-paying jobs. She will also join me in making public colleges and universities tuition free for families in with annual incomes up to $125,000 a year – 83 percent of Americans. She also understands that climate change is real, it is caused by human activity and it is already creating devastating problems. Iowa deserves credit for combating climate change by producing significant amounts of energy from wind and biofuels. Ignoring science, Trump claims climate change is a "hoax" perpetrated by China. While we must move from fossil fuel to energy efficiency and sustainable energy, Trump believes we should expand fossil fuel production. Our nation has struggled for centuries to combat racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination. The job of the next president is to bring us together, not divide us up. Sadly, Trump has made bigotry the cornerstone of his campaign. We cannot turn back the clock by electing a president whose "birther" conspiracy was a racist attack on our first African-American president, whose anti-immigrant rants have slurred Mexicans as "rapists" and "criminals,” who would ban Muslims from entering the country and who has called women "pigs," "dogs" and "slobs." Trump has been called “a race-baiting, xenophobic, religious bigot.” That’s not me talking. That’s Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham. For those reasons and many more, Donald Trump must not become the next president of the United States. On November 8, the choice is clear. Hillary Clinton for president.
Gandalf Posted October 4, 2016 Posted October 4, 2016 (edited) Dobro, de, "birther" pokret se moze interpretirati kao rasistick ali nije nikakav direktan dokazz rasizma. edit: što i ne mora van svake sumnje da dokaže da je Tramp žaba. ali skakuće i krekeće kao oni. looks like a duck... cela ta ujdurma je bila rasisticka. nisu nosali kapuljace i svastike, Tramp i drugi su se kreveljili u "nudge nudge, wink wink" stilu. ali je bilo jasno da niko ne bi doveo u pitanje Obamino poreklo, da mu je otac bio neki plavooki Magnus ili plavokosi Torvald. edit: slican pristup i tokom kampanje. "neki kazu", "mnogi tvrde", "pojedine cetvrti"... “Watch your polling booths, because I hear too many stories about Pennsylvania, certain areas,” the Republican nominee told the almost exclusively white crowd in Manheim. He added: “We can’t lose an election because you know what I am talking about.” Edited October 4, 2016 by Gandalf
Budja Posted October 4, 2016 Posted October 4, 2016 looks like a duck... cela ta ujdurma je bila rasisticka. nisu nosali kapuljace i svastike, Tramp i drugi su se kreveljili u "nudge nudge, wink wink" stilu. ali je bilo jasno da niko ne bi doveo u pitanje Obamino poreklo, da mu je otac bio neki plavooki Magnus ili plavokosi Torvald. O, da, apsolutno, ali upravo je "nudge nudge, wink wink" ono sto razlikuje prikriveni od otvorenog rasizma. I, opet, kako od neke knjige iz 1991. dodjosmo do birther issue?
Gandalf Posted October 4, 2016 Posted October 4, 2016 (edited) O, da, apsolutno, ali upravo je "nudge nudge, wink wink" ono sto razlikuje prikriveni od otvorenog rasizma. I, opet, kako od neke knjige iz 1991. dodjosmo do birther issue? nije bio baš prikriveni. nisu vikali "ua, crnja" na sav glas, ali su Tramp i drustvo bili suptilni koliko i Erik Ajdl u skeču. došli smo tako što si ti pitao zašto Tramp nije izbačen iz Mlađeg Referenta. ja odgovorio: kada je krenuo da brljavi, rejtinzi nisu pali, već skočili. good business. Edited October 4, 2016 by Gandalf
Recommended Posts