Trump this!

[Budja]

:D

 

Naravno. To što se sam blamiraš nema veze.

 

Ajde još jednom theansweru:

- Da li je snimak iz 2010?

- Da li je Beckel Babin strateg?

 

O poredjenju Asanža i DJV još i možemo, iako je svima jasno da su obojica narcisisti i koriste medije za svoje dupe.

 

Sto znaci da su obojica isto sto i Hitler, Kim Kardasijan, Kanye West, Nebojsa Krstic...

I oni su narcisisti i koriste medije za svoje dupe.

[Desmond Bojčinski]

a kinezi u pozadini likuju sto su neupotrebljivi za propagandu.

Misliš da neće i oni doći na red kad tad?

[Meazza]

Da neko poredi Asanza i DJV.

 

Jedan je rezimsko pseto koje se uvlaci u cmar svakom ko je mocniji od njega, a drugi se zamera najmocnijima na svetu rizikujuci zivot i zdravlje.

Edited August 11, 2016 by IndridCold

[ObiW]

Misliš da neće i oni doći na red kad tad?

zar ti nije drago da u situaciji kada Amerika trazi neprijatelje, u Srbiji imas na vlasti coveka ciji je najbolji prijatelj americki ambasador?

[Eraserhead]

Da neko poredi Asanza i DJV.

 

Jedan je rezimsko pseto koje se uvlaci u cmar svakom ko je mocniji od njega, a drugi se zamera najmocnijima na svetu rizikujuci zivot i zdravlje.

 

I jedan i drugi su u trci za publicitetom i ne prezaju da druge uvaljuju u probeme i lazu radi malo senzacionalizma. Da jedan ima ledja a drugi nema. 

[Weenie Pooh]

Cozy Bear & Fancy Bear

Pa to, neki je medved sto posto, kažu stručnjaci™ koji su inače bili zaduženi upravo za bezbednost DNC sistema. A ko je pozvaniji da NCIS metodama utvrdi identitet počinioca nego nesposobnjakovići koji su mu dozvolili da upadne i uzme šta god hoće? 

 

"The malware samples were conspicuously large (1.9 MB) This is a very specific modus operandi less sophisticated actors do not employ." :D

 

"By concocting the fiction that the lone hacker Guccifer 2.0 was the culprit backed up by having him release the dump, we now spend our time arguing over who Guccifer 2.0 really is instead of accepting Crowdstrike's report at face value By the time any consensus is reached, the media has moved on to the next story. SOP for the Kremlin."

 

Tako posluju ti opaki medvedi, ukradu savršeno nebitnu stranačku prepisku pa je plasiraju preko rumunskog nikogovića da se mediji ne dosete, koliko smo samo puta to videli do sada. Wily Russians. It is known.

[Meazza]

I jedan i drugi su u trci za publicitetom i ne prezaju da druge uvaljuju u probeme i lazu radi malo senzacionalizma. Da jedan ima ledja a drugi nema.

 

Jedan je zrtva, drugi je pseto. A ti si ispod nivoa PZD, svaki put probijes dno.

[dillinger]

To izgleda kad posmatras stvari iz Srbije. U Americi se primecuje da Hilari u pomoc zove bivse americke predsednike, a Trump sadasnjeg ruskog predsednika.

 

Kad i gde ga to zove, u zajedničku borbu protiv IS?

[Eraserhead]

Jedan je zrtva, drugi je pseto. A ti si ispod nivoa PZD, svaki put probijes dno.

 

Obojica su budale i prevaranti.

[3opge]

Obojica su budale i prevaranti.

 

koga je to Asanz prevario (osim sto namerno probija kurtone prilikom snosaja)?

[Meazza]

Obojica su budale i prevaranti.

 

Za DJV nisam siguran, ali Asanz je za tebe ljudska gromada.

[marv]

Obojica su budale i prevaranti.

 

ja ne znam ko je taj dj kojim ga uporedjujete, ali kada kazes da je asanz prevarant bilo bi dobro da to nekako obrazlozis. inace asanz je pravi disident

 

 

 

btw

 

The Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Deems the deprivation of liberty of Mr. Julian Assange as arbitrary

 

On 4 December 2015, the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (WGAD) adopted Opinion No. 54/2015, in which it considered that Mr. Julian Assange was arbitrarily detained by the Governments of Sweden and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. In that opinion, the Working Group recognized that Mr. Assange is entitled to his freedom of movement and to compensation. The application was filed with the Working Group in September 2014. The Opinion 54/2015 was sent to the Governments of Sweden and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland on 22 January 2016 in accordance with the Working Group’s Methods of Work.

 

Given that Mr. Assange is an Australian citizen, one of the members of the Working Group who shares his nationality recused herself from participating in the deliberations. Another member of the Working Group disagreed with the position of the majority and considered that the situation of Mr. Assange is not one of detention and therefore falls outside the mandate of the Working Group.

 

In mid-2010, a Swedish Prosecutor commenced an investigation against Mr. Assange based on allegations of sexual misconduct. On 7 December 2010, pursuant to an international arrest warrant issued at the request of the Swedish Prosecutor, Mr. Assange was detained in Wandsworth Prison for 10 days in isolation. Thereafter, he was subjected to house arrest for 550 days. While under house arrest in the United Kingdom, Mr. Assange requested the Republic of Ecuador to grant him refugee status at its Embassy in London. The Republic of Ecuador granted asylum because of Mr. Assange’s fear that if he was extradited to Sweden, he would be further extradited to the United States where he would face serious criminal charges for the peaceful exercise of his freedoms. Since August 2012, Mr. Assange has not been able to leave the Ecuadorian Embassy and is subject to extensive surveillance by the British police.

 

The Working Group considered that Mr. Assange has been subjected to different forms of deprivation of liberty: initial detention in Wandsworth prison which was followed by house arrest and his confinement at the Ecuadorian Embassy. Having concluded that there was a continuous deprivation of liberty, the Working Group also found that the detention was arbitrary because he was held in isolation during the first stage of detention and because of the lack of diligence by the Swedish Prosecutor in its investigations, which resulted in the lengthy detention of Mr. Assange. The Working Group found that this detention is in violation of Articles 9 and 10 of the UDHR and Articles 7, 9(1), 9(3), 9(4), 10 and 14 of the ICCPR, and falls within category III as defined in its Methods of Work.

 

The Working Group therefore requested Sweden and the United Kingdom to assess the situation of Mr. Assange to ensure his safety and physical integrity, to facilitate the exercise of his right to freedom of movement in an expedient manner, and to ensure the full enjoyment of his rights guaranteed by the international norms on detention. The Working Group also considered that the detention should be brought to an end and that Mr. Assange should be afforded the right to compensation.

 

5 February 2016

 

 

 

 

[katamaran]

 

ja ne znam ko je taj dj 

Ti si srecan covek

 

Edited August 11, 2016 by katamaran

[dragance]

kao ti onda kad si se blamirao za polling? šta te boli ona stvar ako se ja blamiram. i slepac zna da je snimak iz 2010. bob bekel nije hilarin strateg ali kao komentator cnn-a je neko ko je izrazito anti tramp u svakom nastupu. tako da nema neke velike razlike između njega i njenih stratega. fejspalmovi su za to što je asanž djv i što u poređenju sa hilari asanž je izgleda bad guy ovde. ludilo.

Rad bih bio da me podsetiš. Zajebem se često (verujem i tada), no i tada manje nego pollovi, naročito uzimajući u obzir kako electoral colleges funkcionišu.

 

Davno je Asanž izgubio auru sveca i "pravog disidenta" kad su počela trvenja unutar wikileaksa i kako je sve podredio da on bude u centru pažnje.

 

Jednostavno, on i Wikileaks nisu isto, i odlično će funkcionisati i bez njega. Možda i bolje.

[marv]

wikileaks bez njega ko bulsi bez mj-a, naravno da nije isto