Trump this!

[ObiW]

meni ste vi Bernijevi glasacki really cute. Jao pa Obama nista nije uradio, jao pa Klintoka ce isto tako, jao bice smak sveta nek propadne nije steta. 

 

[Ariel]

ja sam Bernijev sinpatizer jer jebiga ne mogu da budem glasač, ali mislim da je Obama bio predsednik kakvog će Ameri praviti od blata. Ne mogu da sudim o tome kako će ga istorija zapamtiti, ali da je u zbiru bio pozitivan lik, to nema sumnje, čak i kada se saberu dronovi i crni životi koji znače i ekonomska kriza, jer sve su to stvari koje je u neku ruku dobio u nasleđe i koje je pokušavao da popravi, što konkretnim akcijama, što PR-imerom sopstvenim. Uzmimo u obzir da je 6 godina bio omeđen republikanskom većinom u Kongresu, i to najretardiranijom i neajekstremističkijom viđenom.

[Ravanelli]

...

Edited June 10, 2016 by Ravanelli

[theanswer]

Obergefell v. Hodges 2015 - pravo gay ljudi na brak. Dok je u pitanju odluka suda delom se i zahvaljujuci Obami stvorila povoljna klima i dosta liberalniji stav prema manjinama. 

 

mislio sam da pričaš o rasnim manjinama. u jebenom čikagu ove godine je već ubijeno skoro 300 ljudi, ni simon nije mogao zamisliti kad je snimao wire. ona vojska koja je poslata u ferguson takođe odavno nije viđena, svi se u kampanji satraše u flint a obamu ne videh tamo itd itd. a pravo gej ljudi na brak je po mojim prioretitma malo niže od toga kad deca piju olovo.

[hazard]

 jao bice smak sveta Amerike nek propadne nije steta. 

 

+1

 

Trumpacolypse 2016

[ObiW]

+1

 

Trumpacolypse 2016

al pazi kad ti 9 novembra ujutro Jenkiji nagrnu u kanuklend i krenu da ti se temeljno useravaju u socdem nacin zivota na koji si toliko ponosan. pravices hilari od blata. 

[ObiW]

mislio sam da pričaš o rasnim manjinama. u jebenom čikagu ove godine je već ubijeno skoro 300 ljudi, ni simon nije mogao zamisliti kad je snimao wire. ona vojska koja je poslata u ferguson takođe odavno nije viđena, svi se u kampanji satraše u flint a obamu ne videh tamo itd itd. 

niko od vas nije primetio da je obama kandidovao temu smanjenja minimalnih kazni za non-violent crimes, sto su uglavnom dileri droge, koji su uglavnom crni. Primeticete da je tema kandidovana, ali  da predlog nije prosao kroz parlament, koji je u rukama partije koja ne veruje u benefit smanjenja broja crnaca u zatvoru. 

 

niste primetili da je pre nekoliko meseci pomilovao nekoliko stotina zatvorenika, uglavnom crnaca, koji su zaglavili decenijske kazne upravo zbog tih minimalnih kazni zatvora?

 

da li znate sta je to fair sentencing act? Obama ga je potpisao 2010. Da li treba da naglasim da je taj zakon prosao kroz parlament u mometnu kada je partija koja blokira svaku inicijativu za smanjanje broja zatvorenika bila u manjini? 

 

I na kraju da li ste primetili da je Obama odbio da posalje FBI u Kolorado da zatvara prodavnice marihuane? Da li bi to isto uradio beli predsednik, republikanac? 

Edited June 10, 2016 by ObiW

[hazard]

al pazi kad ti 9 novembra ujutro Jenkiji nagrnu u kanuklend i krenu da ti se temeljno useravaju u socdem nacin zivota na koji si toliko ponosan. pravices hilari od blata. 

 

meni isto ja svakako imam u planu da se tamo negde u novembru - decembru sa ovog kontinenta evakuišem

[Prospero]

1 komptetentnost da se koristi nuklearno koferče:

 

 

How Clinton Donor Got on Sensitive Intelligence Board

By Matthew Mosk, Brian Ross, CHO PARK

Jun 10, 2016, 6:59 AM ET
 

Newly released State Department emails help reveal how a major Clinton Foundation donor was placed on a sensitive government intelligence advisory board even though he had no obvious experience in the field, a decision that appeared to baffle the department’s professional staff.

The emails further reveal how, after inquiries from ABC News, the Clinton staff sought to “protect the name” of the Secretary, “stall” the ABC News reporter and ultimately accept the resignation of the donor just two days later.

Copies of dozens of internal emails were provided to ABC News by the conservative political group Citizens United, which obtained them under the Freedom of Information Act after more the two years of litigation with the government.
A prolific fundraiser for Democratic candidates and contributor to the Clinton Foundation, who later traveled with Bill Clinton on a trip to Africa, Rajiv K. Fernando’s only known qualification for a seat on the International Security Advisory Board (ISAB) was his technological know-how. The Chicago securities trader, who specialized in electronic investing, sat alongside an august collection of nuclear scientists, former cabinet secretaries and members of Congress to advise Hillary Clinton on the use of tactical nuclear weapons and on other crucial arms control issues.

“We had no idea who he was,” one board member told ABC News.
 

State Department
A State Department photograph shows the 2011 International Security Advisory Board. Rajiv Fernando is seated on the far left of the image.more +
 

Fernando’s lack of any known background in nuclear security caught the attention of several board members, and when ABC News first contacted the State Department in August 2011 seeking a copy of his resume, the emails show that confusion ensued among the career government officials who work with the advisory panel.

“I have spoken to [state Department official and ISAB Executive Director Richard Hartman] privately, and it appears there is much more to this story that we’re unaware of,” wrote Jamie Mannina, the press aide who fielded the ABC News request. “We must protect the Secretary’s and Under Secretary’s name, as well as the integrity of the Board. I think it’s important to get down to the bottom of this before there’s any response.
“As you can see from the attached, it’s natural to ask how he got onto the board when compared to the rest of the esteemed list of members,” Mannina wrote, referring to an attachment that was not included in the recent document release.
 

 
Fernando himself would not answer questions from ABC News in 2011 about what qualified him for a seat on the board or led to his appointment. When ABC News finally caught up with Fernando at the 2012 Democratic convention, he became upset and said he was "not at liberty" to speak about it. Security threatened to have the ABC News reporter arrested.
 
Fernando's expertise appeared to be in the arena of high-frequency trading -- a form of computer-generated stock trading. At the time of his appointment, he headed a firm, Chopper Trading, that was a leader in that field.

Fernando's history of campaign giving dated back at least to 2003 and was prolific -- and almost exclusively to Democrats. He was an early supporter of Hillary Clinton's 2008 bid for president, giving maximum contributions to her campaign, and to HillPAC, in 2007 and 2008. He also served as a fundraising bundler for Clinton, gathering more than $100,000 from others for her White House bid. After Barack Obama bested Clinton for the 2008 nomination, Fernando became a major fundraiser for the Obama campaign. Prior to his State Department appointment, Fernando had given between $100,000 and $250,000 to the William J. Clinton Foundation, and another $30,000 to a political advocacy group, WomenCount, that indirectly helped Hillary Clinton retire her lingering 2008 campaign debts by renting her campaign email list.

The appointment qualified Fernando for one of the highest levels of top secret access, the emails show. Among those with whom Fernando served on the International Security Advisory Board was David A. Kay, the former head of the Iraq Survey Group and United Nations Chief Weapons Inspector; Lt. Gen. Brent Scowcroft, a former National Security Advisor to two presidents; two former congressmen; and former Sen. Chuck Robb. William Perry, the former Secretary of Defense, chaired the panel.

“It is certainly a serious, knowledgeable and experienced group of experts,” said Bruce Blair, a Princeton professor whose principal research covers the technical and policy steps on the path toward the verifiable elimination of nuclear weapons. “Much of the focus has been on questions of nuclear stability and the risks of nuclear weapons use by Russia and Pakistan.”

The newly released emails reveal that after ABC News started asking questions in August 2011, a State Department official who worked with the advisory board couldn’t immediately come up with a justification for Fernando serving on the panel. His and other emails make repeated references to “S”; ABC News has been told this is a common way to refer to the Secretary of State.

“The true answer is simply that S staff (Cheryl Mills) added him,” wrote Wade Boese, who was Chief of Staff for the Office of the Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security, in an email to Mannina, the press aide. “Raj was not on the list sent to S; he was added at their insistence.”
 

 
Mills, a former deputy White House counsel, was serving as Clinton’s chief of staff at the time, and has been a longtime legal and political advisor.

 

Four minutes later, Boese wrote to his boss, Richard Hartman, to alert him that Ellen Tauscher, who was then the Undersecretary for State for Arms Control and International Security Affairs, would be meeting with Mills to devise a response to the ABC News request.

“Sorry this has become a headache,” he wrote.

Hartman wrote the next morning to say he would “come up and brief you... about where Raj Fernando stands and the ABC News investigative journalist inquiries. You do need to hear about it.” Separately, in an email to another official, Hartman noted that it was "Cheryl Mills, who added Mr. Fernando’s name to the list of ISAB nominees."

When ABC News sent a follow-up inquiry about the qualifications of another board appointee, Massachusetts state Rep. Harold P. Naughton, Jr., Boese wrote to Hartman to say the department would have a far easier time explaining Naughton’s credentials. “The case for Rep. Naughton is an easy one. We are on solid ground,” he said.
 

 
By this point, Fernando himself had been looped into the discussion. He and Hartman exchanged emails, but the entire text of Fernando’s letter was redacted by the State Department prior to its release.
Twice, Mannina was instructed to stall with ABC News, before Mills sent a public statement. It announced Fernando’s abrupt decision to step down.
 

 
“Mr. Fernando chose to resign from the Board earlier this month citing additional time needed to devote to his business,” it reads, noting that membership on the board was required to be “fairly balanced in terms of the points of view represented and the functions to be performed by the advisory committee.”

“As President and CEO of Chopper Trading, Mr. Fernando brought a unique perspective to ISAB. He has years of experience in the private sector in implementing sophisticated risk management tools, information technology and international finance,” the statement says.

The statement was emailed to ABC News two days after Fernando’s resignation and four days after the initial ABC News inquiry.

Fernando’s letter of resignation to Clinton says he “intended to devote a substantial amount of time to the work of ISAB in furtherance of its objectives. However, the unique, unexpected, and excessive volatility in the international markets these last few weeks and months require[d him] to focus [his] energy on the operations of [his] company.”

Additional emails collected from Hillary Clinton’s personal server only hint at her possible involvement in Fernando’s selection to the board. The records request for documents about Fernando’s appointment produced a chain of correspondence from 2010 with the subject line “ISAB” -- or International Security Advisory Board. In those, Mills writes, “The secretary had two other names she wanted looked at.” The names are redacted. Mills then forwarded the response to “H,” which is the designation for Clinton’s personal account. Three minutes later Clinton forwards the email chain to another State official and says simply, “Pls print.”

The Clinton campaign declined requests from ABC News to make Mills available for an interview. Campaign spokesman Nick Merrill deferred to the U.S. State Department, which issued a statement saying the board’s charter specifically calls for a membership that reflects “a balance of backgrounds and points of view. Furthermore, it is not unusual for the State Department Chief of Staff to be involved in personnel matters.”
 
Fernando did not respond to messages left by ABC News at home and mobile numbers listed for Fernando, nor to a letter left at the office of his current business.
As is customary with a new administration, the make-up of the board changed substantially when Clinton took over the State Department, according to Amb. James Woolsey, who served on the panel from 2006 to 2009. But the seriousness of its mission remained the same.

He said the board’s primary purpose was to gather an array of experts on nuclear weapons and arms control to constantly assess and update the nation’s nuclear strategy.
“Most things that involve nuclear weapons and nuclear strategy are dealt with at a pretty sensitive basis -- top secret,” he said, noting that participants meet in a secure facility and are restricted in what materials they can discuss.
That is not typically the realm of political donors, Woolsey said. Though, he added, it would not be impossible for someone lacking a security background to make a contribution to the panel. “It would depend on how smart and dedicated this person was... I would think you would have to devote some real time to getting up to speed,” he said.

Fernando is now a board member of a private group called the American Security Project, which describes itself as “a nonpartisan organization created to educate the American public and the world about the changing nature of national security in the 21st Century.” He also identifies himself online as a member of the Chicago Council on Global Affairs and says he's involved with a Washington think tank.

And he continued to donate to Democrats, and to Clinton. He emerged as one of the first “bundlers” to raise money for Clinton’s 2016 bid. And in July 2015, he hosted a fundraiser for Clinton at his Chicago home. Fernando has also continued to donate to the Clinton Foundation. He now is listed on the charity’s website as having given between $1 million and $5 million.

About six months after Fernando resigned from the State Department advisory board, he was invited to attend a White House State Dinner, honoring the British Prime Minister. And this summer Fernando will serve as a super delegate at the Democratic National Convention. According to Chicago media reports, he has committed to supporting Clinton.

 

[Gandalf]

1 komptetentnost da se koristi nuklearno koferče:

Obama je postupao slično, donatori su dobijali nameštenja u administraciji.

 

korumpirana i kvarna, ništa novo. daleko bolja od Trampa.

Edited June 10, 2016 by Gandalf

[Prospero]

Dobro, nije ovo baš slanje donatora da bude ambasador u Portugalu.

[MancMellow]

meni isto ja svakako imam u planu da se tamo negde u novembru - decembru sa ovog kontinenta evakuišem

 

Ako misliš da dolaziš na Mračni kontinent bolje think again :D 

[Gandalf]

Dobro, nije ovo baš slanje donatora da bude ambasador u Portugalu.

nije, zato i napisah da je "slično".

[Amos]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFxFRqNmXKg

[Weenie Pooh]

Heh. Kad guglaš "google hillary clinton search result manipulate", prvo iskače Vox tekst u kom se kaže samo "Nema dokaza! Nema dokaza! Nema dokaza!" Obrazloženje je da Google ima tajnu praksu da ne predlaže termin "crime" vezan za bilo koju osobu, ne samo HRC... pošto, eto, nije lepo da se ljudi optužuju za kriminal  
 

Apparently, Google has a policy of not suggesting that customers do searches on people's crimes. I have no inside knowledge of why it runs its search engine this way. Maybe Google is just uncomfortable with having an algorithm suggesting that people search for other people's crimes.

 
(Verovatno postoji i slično retardirano objašnjenje zašto se za "Clinton indi" predlaže "India" i "Indiana" a ne "indictment" iako je neuporedivo veći broj ljudi tražio ovo poslednje.)
 
Ispod sledi šesnaest linkova do tekstova koji sugerišu da search results jesu bili izmanipulisani, ali eto, onaj izdvojen na vrhu je jedan jedini koji kaže "ma neeeee" i nudi slabašno objašnjenje izvučeno pravo iz dubina sopstvenog anusa.