Trump this!

[iDemo]

[akibono]

Kad udari sirotinja koja neće da prizna da je sirotinja, na sirotinju koja je to prihvatila... Walmart stories.

 

 

This all started by her saying to her son "see this is why you go to college so you don't take handouts"

 

http://youtu.be/iwrNiRngMhc

 

Edited May 5, 2016 by akibono

[theanswer]

kesić je jedno 10x izjavio da neće da bude vp.

 

vini, na koga misliš da je osvojio 0,02 u ohaju? kristi je izašao posle nh. trampu treba neka kondoliza rajs, niki hejli kao vp. to mu treba a realno nije.

[Weenie Pooh]

Posle NH, jesi siguran? Meni je ostalo u pamćenju da se posle Ohaja povukao

[Anduril]

Politico. 

 

Kasparov... leading opposition politican.

 

Bog te jebo, u kom bablu zivi taj Vasington.

 

Zavisi iz kog ugla se posmatra - reci nam ko su po tebi lideri opozicije u Rusiji?

Mozda Nemcov? Onaj poginuli general pre toga? Ovi sto su proterani van zemlje?

Ili mozda verujes da je lako organizovati znacajniju (demokratsku) opoziciju Kremlju pa se raspoznaju tako lako...

 

P.S. Btw. ako ce nas neko dovesti do ruba atomskog rata onda su to Putin i Tramp. 

Edited May 5, 2016 by Anduril

[frn1782]

Pa imas nacionaliste rojaliste svasta nesto, ruska desnica koja Putina vidi kao mekog oligarha koji dudla zapadnom imperijalizmu umesto da obnavlja treci rim.

Onda imas komuniste koji bi to isto ali u SSSR formi.

Kasparov je opcija koliko i komunisticka partija u SAD.

[dragance]

kesić je jedno 10x izjavio da neće da bude vp.

Zamisli, političari (često) urade suprotno od onog što su rekli nekoliko puta!

[theanswer]

Posle NH, jesi siguran? Meni je ostalo u pamćenju da se posle Ohaja povukao

 

jesam. kesić je bio drugi u nh pa je kristi izašao. kristi je išao all in tamo. buš posle sc, on je tamo išao all in. rubio posle floride. ne sećam se kad je karson zvanično izašao.

[*edited by mod]

Trump juce rekao da treba obarati ruske avione koji prete tako da pretpostavljam da je zavrsen medeni mesec ludaka iz NY i kriminalca iz Kremlja.

 

Zapravo je rekao da bi pozvao Putina i rekao mu "E neki ludak radi to i to, reci mu da prestane." Pa ako bi se nastavilo da bi ga onda gadjao.

 

Naravno u kontekstu onih letova oko americkih nosaca u medjunarodnim vodama.

Edited May 5, 2016 by *edited by mod

[namenski]

[frn1782]

Srednji red treca s leva deluje ko ona glumica iz Back to the Future 3

Edited May 5, 2016 by frn1782

[Budja]

Zavisi iz kog ugla se posmatra - reci nam ko su po tebi lideri opozicije u Rusiji?

Mozda Nemcov? Onaj poginuli general pre toga? Ovi sto su proterani van zemlje?

Ili mozda verujes da je lako organizovati znacajniju (demokratsku) opoziciju Kremlju pa se raspoznaju tako lako...

 

P.S. Btw. ako ce nas neko dovesti do ruba atomskog rata onda su to Putin i Tramp. 

 

Onaj ciji je brat u zatvoru.

Navalni.

20ak posto za gradonacelnika Moskve.

 

Ali sam siguran da si to znao nego ti je potrebna retoricka figura, a Navalni je takodje cvrstorukas koji ne mase ukrajinskim zastavama te tako sigurno ne moze biti "leading".

[hazard]

Dobar clanak...sometimes you gotta say the obvious (mislim, preteruje malo, millenials se isto loze na isprazne stvari samo je hajp drugaciji, ali dosta toga stoji, narocito ovo o starijim generacijama koji su se navikli na u sustini fejk politicare pa im drugaciji izgledaju ,,neozbljno"):

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/cenk-uygur/why-millennials-love-bernie_b_9839450.html

 

 

 

Why Millennials Love Bernie Sanders

 

Why do millennials like Bernie Sanders so much? I love that this is a mystery to Washington. It’s the authenticity, stupid. You can’t fake a 40 year record. This is a generation that grew up in a time when entertainment and media is based on authenticity and not the fakeness of television. Like Diogenes, when millennials went on their pursuit to find the one honest man in politics, it was obvious that man was Bernie Sanders.

 

The older generation grew up on blow-dried anchors, plastic politicians, and an ocean of pretense. Realness seems unvarnished and unpolished to them. Bernie Sanders is a man not of his time, but of this time. He was authentic and uncombed before any YouTube star thought to make that concept cool.

 

Millennials are also a massively progressive generation. Frank Luntz, the top conservative pollster, says this generation is so liberal it should frighten political leaders. Sanders is as progressive as they are, but not because he crafted a slick political message to appeal to the younger generation. It’s because he is a true progressive who believed in these principles even when they were horribly out of fashion. He fought for them not out of expediency but out of conviction. That’s the thing about authenticity — you can’t fake it.

 

Are we seriously asking why young people don’t like the contrived politicians who are awash in donor money, privilege, and connections? That’s obvious. What’s not obvious is how older generations got so used to that pulp. They got used to news actors reading carefully-produced, establishment-engineered scripts. They got used to the unctuous career politicians that design their message to the voters while they vote with the donors. Running to the left or right during the primaries and then to the center during the general election isn’t savvy, it’s phony.

 

The problem in our politics today isn’t the younger generation. The problem is what the older generations have grown accustomed to and now meekly accept as fact. The younger voters are right — you can and you should expect better from your representatives.

 

Millennials grew up on the Internet. Older generations look at the downside of being an Internet native and carp about how kids are obsessed with their smart phones. But what about the upside? Those phones can access infinite information — more than all of the libraries of mankind put together. Yes, a lot of the younger generation check Tinder on their phones, but a lot of them also check the facts. With all of this information literally in their pocket, they’re better equipped to gauge the accuracy of political claims — much more so than older generations who get their news filtered through broad, corporate television broadcasts.

 

Millennials are much more informed than they get credit for and many are more politically knowledgeable than older generations. A lot of millennials know that many countries have a single payer healthcare system and understand how realistic it is in most of the developed world. Many know how serious climate change is and the need for immediate change in energy and pollution policy. They understand that incrementalism isn’t pragmatism, it’s running out the clock on a problem that only gets worse over time.

 

Why do so many thousands of young people show up at Bernie rallies? Do you really think it’s because they’re looking for a good time or for a date? I can assure you that there are far more efficient ways to do that than to attend political rallies. The older generations should stop for a second and examine their own biases. Isn’t it possible — and wonderful — that the younger generation cares so much about policy that they are going to attend the rallies of the one politician they believe in?

 

For those of us who care deeply about policy and authenticity, it’s hard to get excited by studied politicians who craft messages based on polling and who drift in the winds of time. Instead of mocking millennials for their adoration of Bernie Sanders, older generations should stop and reconsider their support for an establishment that has worked against their interests for so many years. It’s not realistic as much as it is sad that a whole generation has accepted income inequality, political corruption and the reign of the donor class as immutable facts. Instead of frowning upon your kids who are fighting back against that, perhaps you should join them.

 

[Gandalf]

I promised to eat my column if Drumpf got the nomination. I'm keeping my promise.

[hazard]

http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/trump-republican-party-implosion-1.3564282

 

 

ANALYSIS

Trump is the fuel, but Republican Party will burn itself down: Neil Macdonald

Trump himself won't bring about the end of his party; the Republican 'base' will do that all on its own

By Neil Macdonald, CBC News Posted: May 05, 2016 5:00 AM ET Last Updated: May 05, 2016 8:21 PM ET

 

There's a dolorous whinge permeating the chatter of the chattering classes about the state of American democracy.

Once the subject of Donald Trump arises, which seems to happen within five minutes nowadays at any dinner party or social event, it's become fashionable for educated progressives to put on an expression of great sadness and bleat out a lament for the future of humanity in general.

 

Then, because small "l" liberals love to overstate things, some tender soul offers an apocalyptic scenario: Trump is like Hitler, Trump will set women's rights back a century, good people will no longer be able to visit the United States, World War Three will happen, etc., etc.

 

All of which is foolishness. As all sorts of prominent voices in the Republican Party are publicly acknowledging, Trump is unelectable in a general contest.

 

Think about it: Trump's vulgarity and extremism has alienated him from his own party's leadership and most moderate Republicans.  

 

In the primaries so far, he has averaged about 40 per cent of the Republican vote. So, a majority of his own party's members have so far opposed him.

 

And does anyone seriously believe Trump has any appeal across party lines?

 

This man is not Ronald Reagan. "Trump Democrats" might exist, but we haven't seen them in any great numbers yet.

 

As South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham — a Republican —  nicely puts it: "Women and Latinos hate his guts, and with good reason."

 

GOP dissolution inevitable

 

No, Donald Trump is not going to be president, or invade Mexico, or deport all immigrants, or disenfranchise women voters, or drop nuclear bombs in Syria and Iraq.

 

What he almost certainly is going to do, though, is trigger an enormous disruption of the Republican Party, or even its breakup.

 

I use the word "trigger" deliberately here, because Trump himself won't actually bring about the end of his party. He's only the catalyst.

 

If it weren't him presiding over the chaos, it would eventually be somebody else — say, one of those Tea Party characters who show up at rallies in tricorne hats, waving muskets around, vowing to destroy the career of any Republican politician who even considers bipartisanship for the sake of responsible governance.

 

Or perhaps it would be one of the fanatics who surround abortion clinics, harassing and screeching at patients as they enter, at a time when what they really need is privacy and sound medical advice.

 

Or maybe one of the Young Earth Protestant fundamentalists who take over local school boards, then try to force schools to give superstition equal place alongside the theory of evolution.

 

Or one of the zealots who demand, in the name of religion, the legal right to discriminate against anyone who isn't heterosexual.

 

Establishment mishandled insurgents

 

All of the foregoing groups are charter members of the so-called Republican Party base. And it is they who are actually carrying out the party breakup. They will proudly acknowledge it if you ask them (I have).

 

The party establishment, meaning most Republicans who have actually managed to win public office, handled the insurgents badly from the outset.

 

Rather than explaining to them that abortion is settled law, to use the words of the conservative Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, Republican politicians kept pretending Roe vs. Wade could somehow be reversed, if only the party base kept voting Republican.

 

They pretended that 11 million undocumented immigrants, the underclass that does America's scut work, could all be summarily deported someday, if the base just kept voting Republican.

 

They pretended to go along with the idea of cutting entire departments of government, and pretended that taxes could be cut endlessly, as though that could be done without also eliminating the entitlements that the base fecklessly embraces.

 

They promised to govern with the Bible in one hand, and the Constitution in the other.

 

But it didn't work. To zealots, surrender is like cocaine – there's never enough to satisfy.

 

So eventually, they went to war with their own party, waving their muskets. They chewed up John Boehner, the former House Speaker, and Eric Cantor, Boehner's No. 2. They made lists and targeted Republican incumbents nationwide.

 

And now, lo and behold, Donald Trump.

 

Unelectable, perhaps, but he's a big satisfying middle finger to everyone — the GOP brass, moderate Republicans, Democrats, immigrants and everybody else who would bring America into the new millennium.

 

Trump nomination will wreck state, local contests

 

So, ultimately, the Republican stable isn't just going to be swamped out. It's going to be burned down.

 

It will probably mean a generation in the wilderness, or maybe two, before conservatives reform and achieve national power again.

 

Almost certainly, as the conservative columnist George F. Will predicts, a Trump nomination will create all sorts of "down-ballot carnage": state, county and municipal Republicans will capsize in his bombastic wake.

 

Meanwhile, Obamacare will become unshakably entrenched, the nuclear deal with Iran will go ahead, and Democrats will see to it that the Supreme Court is stacked with progressive justices for decades to come.

 

But let's be clear: it isn't the hated liberals or the politically correct left that are doing this to the GOP. It's a gloriously Republican self-immolation.

 

President Barack Obama was wrong when he snarked at the media last weekend, asking us if we're proud of ourselves for paying so much attention to Trump, whose candidacy, according to Obama, was really just an attempt to boost his hotel business and not worthy of constant coverage.

 

In fact, Trump's run has been democracy in action.

 

Creative destruction and all that. A perfect free market solution for a party that adores market forces.

 

How can we not cheer such a thing? You go, GOP.