WTF Posted March 21, 2016 Posted March 21, 2016 ;D Istraga, analiza, cinjenice to je sve za bezmude ckepi. Zna Donald sta radi, samo vesto krije detalje, sto da otkriva karte, element iznenadjenja, to je to. Ovaj clip je bullshit! Mora da ga je finansirala Baba
ObiW Posted March 21, 2016 Posted March 21, 2016 (edited) Istraga, analiza, cinjenice to je sve za bezmude ckepi. Zna Donald sta radi, samo vesto krije detalje, sto da otkriva karte, element iznenadjenja, to je to. Ovaj clip je bullshit! Mora da ga je finansirala Baba Nisi video da su Obaba i Obama glasali za zid 2006? Edited March 21, 2016 by ObiW
Weenie Pooh Posted March 21, 2016 Posted March 21, 2016 (edited) Šalu nastranu, meni je kao laiku za ekonomiju od starta nejasno kako Trump pokušava da dovede u vezu cenu izgradnje Zida i trade deficit sa Meksikom. Šta zamišlja da tu može da se uradi? Da će kao uvoznik da diktira cenu meksičke nafte, i tako uštedi par milijardi? Edited March 21, 2016 by Weenie Pooh
Peter Fan Posted March 21, 2016 Posted March 21, 2016 repeal of NAFTA would do the trick. - trust me, it's gonna be great! To kao mehanizam pritiska da se Meksiko "urazumi". E sad, koliko je to izvedljivo, to nema veze.
WTF Posted March 21, 2016 Posted March 21, 2016 Šalu nastranu, meni je kao laiku za ekonomiju od starta nejasno kako Trump pokušava da dovede u vezu cenu izgradnje Zida i trade deficit sa Meksikom. Šta zamišlja da tu može da se uradi? Da će kao uvoznik da diktira cenu meksičke nafte, i tako uštedi par milijardi? Zaplenice pare koje meksicki emigranti iz USA salju nazad familiji u Meksiko.
Peter Fan Posted March 21, 2016 Posted March 21, 2016 Cak ni ne mora da se NAFTA ukine, dovoljno je da se oteza legalni promet lica i robe, odnosno da se carinski propisi "utegnu" i/ili da se pocnu malo kreativnije tumaciti. Ili neki tihi embargo, kao stu su Rusi radili sa Turskom, odnosno vocem iz Turkse. Pa onda da se nekoliko vecih biznisa koji koriste ilegalce drasticno kazni za primjer drugima (drakonske kazne za firme, i krivicno gonjeneje za odgovorna lica) i bilo bi tu svasta.
dragance Posted March 21, 2016 Posted March 21, 2016 Samo sto ta roba i usluge dolaze od americkih kompanija koje autsursuju preko svojih filijala u Meksiku, a carinski propisi ne mogu direktno da se utegnu (zbog NAFTA-e), ali bi mogli standardi da se uvedu koji su indirektno oporezivanje. I na kraju bi opet amerikanac, i potrosac i biznismen zajedno, najebao sto bi bio ekspresni kraj Trampa.
Weenie Pooh Posted March 21, 2016 Posted March 21, 2016 Aali zar jee Meksiko osuđen na trgovinu sa USA? Zar nemaju gde drugde da uvale robu ako im ovaj zacepi nekakve kreativne građevinske tarife?
ObiW Posted March 21, 2016 Posted March 21, 2016 (edited) nego da se vratimo na moju omiljenu temu: Hilari Klinton: Why do they hate Hillary Clinton so much? Of course, Republicans have known for a long time that Hillary Clinton is an unusually strong candidate, and this terrifies them. So they have seized on talking points like Benghazi (for which she bears little or no responsibility) and her email scandal. On the latter, even columnist Ruth Marcus -- certainly no fan of Clinton's -- recently wrote in The Washington Post that "there is no clear evidence that Clinton knew (or even should have known) that the material in her emails was classified." As we've seen, neither Benghazi nor the email trouble are likely to put off Democratic voters, who regard them as Republican talking points. Clinton gets slammed for "shouting" and not smiling enough, though these are criticisms we don't hear about the male candidates. The main thing to dislike about Hillary Clinton seems to be her gender, and one can only begin to imagine the kind of language Donald Trump will summon in the general election. She does shade the truth at times, as do all politicians, including Sanders. Politifact, an excellent website, measures the truth-quality of statements by everyone running for president on both sides of the aisle, and Clinton comes out as perhaps the most truthful of the pack, even more so than Sanders -- although the two are more or less even, telling the whole truth or something like the truth about half the time. Make no doubt about it: Clinton remains a liberal Democrat. She and Sanders actually voted "the same way 93% of the time in the two years they shared in the Senate," according to an analysis done by The New York Times. She is, plainly, more centrist than Sanders on most issues -- but the differences between them are hardly vast. The abuse of Hillary Clinton must stop. She's not perfect. But she's smart, experienced and compassionate, and she will step into the Oval Office better prepared to take on an exacting job in difficult times than almost anyone in recent memory. http://edition.cnn.com/2016/03/20/opinions/why-the-hate-for-hillary-clinton-opinion-parini/index.html Edited March 21, 2016 by ObiW
Time Crisis Posted March 21, 2016 Posted March 21, 2016 Znaci, mislis da je OK sistematski koristiti "baba" kao pezorativ za zenske politicare poput Hilari, Merkel, itd.? Ne vidis razliku kada se kaze da je neko glup ili glupa? Nisam ni sumnjao - navijacka subkultura rula.
Peter Fan Posted March 21, 2016 Posted March 21, 2016 Ooogromna vecina izvoza iz tzv. manufacturing sektora je za US. Sve velike americke firme koje su dolje, koriste MX kao low cost source za americku potrosnju. Bijela tehnika, auto-industrija i sijaset drugih firmi. MX nije konkurentan u Evropi (uglavnom) zbog svoje geografije, a i nemaja carinske prednosti koje omogucava NAFTA.
dragance Posted March 21, 2016 Posted March 21, 2016 Compassionate: Brave: Sniper fire in Tuzla Brought peace in Northern Ireland, itd, i sl.
Peter Fan Posted March 21, 2016 Posted March 21, 2016 Samo sto ta roba i usluge dolaze od americkih kompanija koje autsursuju preko svojih filijala u Meksiku, a carinski propisi ne mogu direktno da se utegnu (zbog NAFTA-e), ali bi mogli standardi da se uvedu koji su indirektno oporezivanje. I na kraju bi opet amerikanac, i potrosac i biznismen zajedno, najebao sto bi bio ekspresni kraj Trampa. Itekako mogu, pogledati pod carine za bakarne cijevi, recimo. Inace, manji pad kupovne moci nije toliko vazan,koliko je gubljenje posla uslijed MX outsourcinga. Objasnio je to vec (cini mi se) Budja 20-ak stranica prije. Ubaci Carrier Indianapolis u YouTube, da navedem jedan friski primjer.
Recommended Posts