Filipenko Posted December 23, 2013 Posted December 23, 2013 Dobrodošli na topik zamišljen kao mesto gde ćemo odavati poslednju počast velikanima našeg doba koji nemaju neke zasebne teme, niti se njihova dela mogu vezivati tek tako za postojeće topike otvarane sasvim drugim povodom. Odajmo im poštu ovde, u stilu po izboru, uz ravnodušnost, tugu i plač ili aplauz.
Filipenko Posted December 23, 2013 Author Posted December 23, 2013 (edited) Slobodan svet ostaje bez svojih velikana. Nakon nedavnog odlaska Vo Ngijen Đapa, danas slobodari tuguju za Mihailom Kalašnjikovim. Neka večno traje njegov plamen, koji je omogućio tolikim ljudima da dobiju šansu da se izbore za svoju slobodu, i ličnu i grupnu; ugnjetenom da se odupre, žrtvi da uzvrati, da ne dobijaju udarce po obrazima do smrti, kako ih podstiče tzv. religija. Umro je u 95. godini, kao i svi najbolji, otišao je prerano.Večnaja pamjat, tavariš Mihail! Edited December 23, 2013 by Filipenko
ivy Posted December 23, 2013 Posted December 23, 2013 naziveo se bar da vidi rezultate svog izuma..sta mislite kako mu je bilo da gleda?
nautilus Posted December 24, 2013 Posted December 24, 2013 (edited) bog je stvorio coveka a ak47 ga je ucinio istimzvezdarska zidna mudrost Edited December 24, 2013 by nautilus
Yoda Posted December 31, 2013 Posted December 31, 2013 Ljubomir Tadic (1925 - 2013) Umro Ljubomir TadićIzvor: B92, Tanjug Beograd -- Akademik Ljubomir Tadić, otac bivšeg predsednika Srbije, preminuo je noćas u Beogradu u 88. godini, rečeno je Tanjugu u SANU. Ljubomir Tadić rođen je u mestu Smriječno u Crnoj Gori 1925. godine. Studirao je pravo u Beogradu i Sarajevu. Karijeru je počeo kao asistent na Pravnom fakultetu u Sarajevu 1954. godine.Sa šesnaest godina pristupio je partizanima, a o svom poreklu je govorio: "Srbin sam iz Crne Gore, iz Stare Hercegovine, koja je pripala Crnoj Gori posle Nevesinjskog ustanka 1878. Dakle, moje nacionalno opredeljenje nije ideološko (...) Iako sam promenio način života, sišao u ravnicu, nisam siguran da sam potpuno promenio gorštački način razmišljanja. Ravničari su civilizovaniji, napredniji u ekonomskom smislu, ali šta je, zaista, napredak, trebalo bi pomno analizirati."Nedeljnik NIN je 2004. o Ljubomiru Tadiću napisao da uz njegovo ime mogu ravnopravno da stoje sledeće odrednice: "naš prvi filozof prava, praksisovac, šezdesetosmaš, disident, jedan od pokretača časopisa ’Javnost’, član SANU, osnivač Demokratske stranke, predsednik Srpsko-jevrejskog društva (...). Čovek je vedrog duha i nezlobivog odnosa prema životu."1964. je izabran za profesora na Filozofskom fakultetu. Sa grupom drugih profesora je zbog dešavanja iz 1968. godine udaljen sa fakulteta. Kasnije je prešao na Institut društvenih nauka i tu ostao do penzionisanja. Za akademika je izabran 1984. godine. O Memorandumu SANU svojevremeno je govorio da je to bio jedan nedovršen dokument.O tome da je prešao put od levičara do nacionaliste, Ljubomir Tadić je govorio: "U mojim knjigama ne možete naći da sam zastupao nekakve nacionalističke stavove. Ali, gde je reč o pravdi i nepravdi, uvek sam se jasno iskazivao. I dalje smatram da je politika Zapada prema Srbima velika politička nepravda. Slovenci su osvojili nezavisnost ubijajući regrute... Likvidacija regruta u Tuzli... Dobrovoljačka ulica u Sarajevu... Tuđmanova politika je u startu bila agresivna... Ispada da su samo Srbi agresori, dok su svi drugi jadna nevinašca. Ne mogu da prihvatim takvu nepravdu, to je moje opredeljenje. Dakle, ne nacionalšovinističko stanovište, nego opredeljenje protiv očigledne nepravde, koja traje." (NIN, 2004)Kada je Boris Tadić izabran za predsednika Srbije njegov otac objasnio je da se njih dvojica politički razlikuju: "stariji je socijaldemokrata a mlađi je za demokratski liberalizam", (Politika, 2004). Takođe kazao je da mu je smetala ocena da je njegov sin "prozapadni političar".Dobitnik je Sedmojulske nagrade, Ordena zasluga za narod drugog reda, Ordena rada sa zlatnim vence, Medalje za hrabrost. http://www.b92.net/info/vesti/index.php?yyyy=2013&mm=12&dd=31&nav_category=12&nav_id=795260
fikret selimbašić Posted January 17, 2014 Posted January 17, 2014 A Japanese soldier who refused to surrender after World War Two ended and spent 29 years in the jungle has died aged 91 in Tokyo. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-25772192
Turnbull Posted February 8, 2014 Posted February 8, 2014 Umro Robet Dal u cvetu starosti (98).Home> Entertainment Robert Dahl, Political Scientist, Dead at 98NEW YORK February 7, 2014 (AP)By HILLEL ITALIE AP National WriterRobert A. Dahl, an esteemed and influential political scientist who in such books as "Who Governs?" championed democracy in theory and critiqued it in practice, has died. He was 98.A professor emeritus at Yale University, Dahl died Wednesday at a nursing home in Hamden, Conn., according to his daughter Sara Connor.His career lasted for more than half a century, but he was best known for the 1961 publication "Who Governs?" Cited by the Times Literary Supplement as among the 100 most influential books since World War II, "Who Governs?" probed the political system of Dahl's own community at the time, New Haven, which he considered an ideal microcosm for the country: two strong parties, a long history and a careful progression from patrician rule to self-made men to party rule, where candidates of varied ethnic and economic backgrounds — a garage owner, an undertaker, a director of publicity — might succeed.Dahl wanted to know who really ran the city, and, by extension, the country. Sociologist C. Wright Mills, in "The Power Elite," had written that wealth and power were concentrated within a tiny group of people. Dahl believed no single entity was in charge. Instead, there were competing ones — social, economic and political leaders whose goals often did not overlap. He acknowledged that many citizens did not participate in local issues and that the rich had advantages over the poor, but concluded that New Haven, while a "republic of unequal citizens," was still a republic.Dahl's conclusions were strongly challenged in the 1970s by sociologist G. William Domhoff, who used research provided in part by Dahl himself to find that he had underestimated the power of the business community and overestimated the divisions among New Haven's leaders. Domhoof alleged that Dahl relied too much on the people he spoke with."It may be that the most serious criticism I can make of Dahl is that he never should have done this interview-based study in the first place, for it was doomed from the start to fall victim to the ambitions and plans of the politicians, planners, lawyers and businessmen that he was interviewing," Domhoff wrote.Dahl himself tried to bring more democracy to the Yale campus, especially during the uprisings of the 1960s and '70s. In 1965, he headed a committee that gave students a role in granting tenure to faculty members. Six years later, he chaired a committee that led the school to start a program for African-American studies.Dahl was born in Inwood, Iowa, in 1915, and a decade later moved to Alaska, when it was still a territory. He graduated from the University of Washington in 1936, and received a Ph.D. from Yale in 1940. During World War II, he was an economist on the War Production Board and later served as first lieutenant in the Army, receiving a Bronze Star. He joined the Yale faculty in 1946.He became president of the American Political Science Association and won several prizes, including the Talcott Parsons Prize for social science. His other works included a popular textbook, "Democracy in the United States"; and "Polyarchy," a term coined by Dahl for a modern, decentralized democracy. Connor, his daughter, said Friday that he prided himself on making political science accessible to "general readers."Dahl established several conditions he considered necessary for democracy (and polyarchy), including freedom from foreign interference, the peaceful transfer of power and the right to vote.In recent years, he increasingly questioned whether any existing government fully deserved to be called democratic. He worried that economic inequality made political equality impossible, yet believed that open markets were needed to counteract government control. In "How Democratic is the Constitution?", he criticized the framers as elitist and short-sighted for not ensuring women's rights and for counting slaves as three-fifths of a person when determining a state's right to representation."This was simply diabolical, because to the insult of defining a person held in bondage as three-fifths of a human being it added the injury of using that definition to augment the political power of that person's oppressors," Dahl wrote. "Wise as the framers were, they were necessarily limited by their profound ignorance."In "Democracy and Its Critics," Dahl examined the evolution of democracy from ancient Greece to the present. He noted how fully participatory democracy was only possible in a small community such as Athens (where women and slaves could not vote) and documented how political thinkers came to accept that representation by elections was the only way to sustain democracy in a larger country.Using Socratic dialogues, he also considered the arguments of those who opposed democracy, from anarchists arguing for no government to "guardians" supporting rule by a well-trained elite. Dahl explored what made a system democratic, what endangered a democracy and what ensured its survival. He welcomed the rise of so many democracies in the latter half of the 20th century, from Eastern Europe to South America, but doubted whether any country could meet all of democracy's goals."Yet the vision of people governing themselves as political equals," he wrote, will remain "a compelling if always demanding guide in the search for a society in which people may live together in peace, respect each other's intrinsic equality, and jointly seek the best possible life."Dahl was married twice, the second time to Ann Sale Dahl. He had six children.
Dr Arslanagić Posted February 14, 2014 Posted February 14, 2014 može ovde Kako se navodi, utvrđeno da je uništena arhivska građa: 1. Zemaljska vlada 1878.-1902. (prezidijal, povjerljiva, LB, CIA,) - uništeno je 230 kutija. 2. U Depou 1. prostoriji A. Arhiva Bosne i Hercegovine, smještenom u prizemlju zgrade Predsjedništva BiH, - uništeno je osam arhivskih polica sa građom iz austrijskih arhiva, i to: 2.1. Upravni arhiv Beč 2.1.1. Ministarstvo poljoprivrede 1918; dokument 1, omota 1 2.1.2. Savezni ured za zaštitu spomenika kulture Beč: omota 1 2.1.3. Austrijsko ministarstvo za vjeru i nastavu 1893-1918; fasc.3 2.1.4. Ministarstvo za unutrašnje poslove 1880-1920; kut. 5,fasc.2 2.1.5. Ministarstvo za pravosuđe 1880-1917; kut.5, fasc.2, knji.1 2.1.6. Ministarstvo za javne radove 1908; fasc.1 2.1.7. Saobraćajni arhiv Beč- Bosanske željeznice 1888-1895; fasc.15, paketa 6, 2.1.8. Porodični arhiv Hochenberg - Beč; 2.2. Ratni arhiv Beč: 2.2.1. Carski i kraljevski general za Bosnu i Hercegovinu 1915-1918; fasc.3 2.2.2. Vojno građevinsko odjeljenje; fasc. 1, knjiga 5 2.2.3. Garnizonski sud Sarajevo 1910-1918; fasc.1 2.2.4. Tvrđavinski sud Trebinje 1914-1916, fasc.2 2.2.5. Garnizonski sud Mostar 1885-1915; fasc.1 2.2.6. Vojno-dječački internat Sarajevo 1897-1918, fasc.1 2.2.7. Stari vojni spisi (Alte Feldakten) 1834-1888; kut.7, mokrofilmova 83 rolne 2.2.8. Knjige o podacima o mjerenjima zemljišta i geodteske karte; fasc.4, kut. 9, knjig.98 2.2.9. Vojno građevinska direkcija Trebinje, vojna komadna Zagreb i dr. 1913-1918; fasc.1, 2.2.10. Vojno građevinsko odjeljenje XV korpusa 1918; fasc.2 2.2.11. Vojno građevinsko odjeljenje u Mostaru; fasc.1, knjiga 2., 2.2.12. Knjiga blagajne 1919, knjiga uprave vojnih objekata, stanje magacina GVD; knjiga 3„ 2.2.13. Građevinska direkcija, inžinjersko odjeljenje i druge vojne ustanove u Sarajevu 1914-1918; knjiga 13., 2.2.14. Komandirjaući general i zemaljski šef u Bosni i Hercegovini; fasc.1,, 2.2.15. Proces Gavrilu Principu i drugovima; kutija 3,, fascikla 5., 3. Kopije dnevnika zapovjednog generala i šefa Zemaljske vlade za Bosnu i Hercegovinu Stjepana Sarkotića 1914-1925; uništeno kompletno, 8 kutija, 4. Fond Direkcija BH duhanske režije u Sarajevu 1881-1922; uništeno 40 kutija,5. Glavni odbor narodnog vijeća iz 1918.godine; uništen u potpunosti (3 kutije), 6. Narodna vlada narodnog vijeća 1918-1919. Uništeno u potpunosti (36 kutija) Zemaljska vlada (prezidijal) 1919-1921; uništeno 100.kutija, 6. Pokrajinska uprava za Bosnu i Hercegovinu (prezidijal), 1921-1924; uništeno 80 kutija, 9. Veiliki župan sarajevske oblasti prez, 1923-1929; uništeno 80 kutija, 10. Kraljevska banska uprava drinske banovine pov, pov DZ, 1929-1941; uništeno 360 kutija, 11. Poglavnikovo povjereništvo 1941,-1942; uništeno 50 kutija, 12. Velika župa Vrhbosna 1941.-1945; uništeno 70 kutija, 13. Osobni ured glavnog ustaškog stana 1941; uništeno 12 kutija, 14. Bosanski sabor 1910.-1914, Uništeno u potpunosti (10 kutija) Kutije i fascikle iz perioda Austro-Ugarske (Vojska, Školstvo, Religija, Konidenti, Podaci o Posjedima,) komplent uništeno (3 police) 16. Ustavni sud - Dom za ljudska prava uništeno cea. 16.1. Službeni listovi Narodno jedinstvo 1929.-1941, 3. U Depou 1. prostoriji B. Arhiva Bosne i Hercegovine, smještenom u prizemlju zgrade Predsjedništva Bosne i Hercegovine, uništeno je: 3.1. Zbrika otkupa i poklona; uništeno 30 kutija 3.2. Zbirka fotografija zločina okupatora i saradnika, djelimično oštećena, 3.3. Dosije službenika 1878.-1945.; uništeno 300 kut ja, 3.4. Okružna oblast Sarajevo (opća i prezidijjalna), 1878. -1918.; uništeno 280.kutija 3.5. Zemaljska vlada (prezidijal), 1917.godina; uništeno 50 kutija, 3.6. Zemaljska vlada (prezidijal), 1918.godina; uništeno 10 kutija, 3.7. Zajedničko Ministarstvo flnansija - odjeljenje za Bosnu i Hercegovinu (Gerneinsames Finanz-ministerium - Abteilung fur die Angelegenheiten Bosniens und der Hercegovina) - Beč (1878—1918), opća i povjerljiva građa, knjig.575, kut,2657, fasc.938, 3.8. Zbirka karata (1880-1985), oštećeno 47. komada, 3.9. Pored ovdje navedenih postoje i knjige Protokola opće i povjerljive građe, imenski i predmetni registri, knjige šifara, brojčanici ali zbog nemogućnosti pristupa istim, oštećenja za iste nisu utvrđena. 4. U Depo 1. Prostoriji C. sljedeća dokumentacija je pretrpiia djeiimična oštećenja zbog gašenja požara u susjednim prostorijama: 4.1. Zemaljska komisija za utvrđivanje zločina okupatora i njihovih pomagača -Sarajevo (1944-1947); 1944/1947: knjiga 27, kutija 366, sv.110., 4.2. Zemaljska komisija za ratnu štetu Narodne Republike Bosne i Hercegovine -Sarajevo 1945-1950; 1945/1946, knjiga 8, kutija 27. 4.3. Vrhovni šerijatski sud za Bosnu i Hercegovinu - Sarajevo (1879-1946); 1879/1946: knjiga 50, kutija 514, 4.4. Serijatska sudačka škola 1887.-1945., kutija 70., 4.5. Zemaljski muzej Bosne i Hercegovine - Sarajevo (1888-); (1884-1887) 1888/1968: knjiga 40., kutija 96, omota 15 , 4.6. Radnički pokret, kutija 4.7. Društva 1878-1918, kutija 18 4.8. Procesi komunistima 4.9. Lični fondovi 4.9.1. Enver Redžić, Sulejman Redžić, Fadia Redžić, Iška Sadiković, 4.9.2. Budimlići Sarajevo; knjiga 10., fasc. 2. 4.9.3. Hadži-Risto Todorović - Hadžiristići Sarajevo; 1796/1908, fasc.21, 4.9.4. Jelići Sarajevo; 1797-1906: fasc. 10,4.9.5. Fufići Travnik; 1822-1879, fasc Iz Komisije za očuvanje nacionalnih spomenika BiH podsjećaju javnost da se predmetna građa, na temelju Aneksa 8. Općeg okvirnog sporazuma za mir u Bosni i Hercegovini i Zakona o provođenju odluka Komisije u FBiH ("Službene novine FBiH", br. 2/02, 27/02, 6/04 i 51/07), nalazi u postupku proglašenja nacionalnim spomenikom Bosne i Hercegovine, obzirom da je ista od neprocjenjive dokumentarne i historijske vrijednosti za državu Bosnu i Hercegovinu. Na osnovu izvršenog uvida u razmjere štete pričinjene devastacijom zgrade Predsjedništva, nacionalnog spomenika Bosne i Hercegovine, Komisija je odlučila da istu uvrsti na Listu ugroženih nacionalnih spomenika Bosne i Hercegovine. Komisija očekuje od Vijeća ministara BiH i Vlade Federacije BiH materijalnu, financijsku i drugu pomoć za sanaciju oštećenja, te uvođenje koordinacije svih institucija nadležnih za poslove zaštite kulturno-historijskog naslijeđa, kako bi se spriječila dalja devastacija ostataka, te onemogućio neovlašten ulazak u prostore arhiva, navodi se u saopćenju.
porucnik vasic Posted March 1, 2014 Posted March 1, 2014 Интересантне ствари су уништене или оштећене.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now