January 13, 20205 yr 3 hours ago, pt 2.0 said: Šta tačno u činjenici da ne kupujem hranu kod nakupaca nego u radnjama trigeruje tvoje tankoćutno srce toliko da, iako nisi ama baš ništa napisao na temu, ulažeš jeziv napor i juriš sličice iz 101 dalmatinca po netu samo da bi se meni rugao i tako to - ruganje meni zato što ne dajem svoj novac nakupcima - pretvaraš u temu? Jer, ukoliko sam ja i moj privatan život i način na koji se odnosim prema novcu i nakupcima tema, onda dozvoli da (metodom reciprociteta) iskoristim ovu priliku da ti saopštim da si mi jedan od retko ogavnih likova na ovom forumu. Da malo i ti budeš tema. Ne samo zato što zato što prema onom što pišeš deluješ glup kao kurac, nego i zato što imam dojam o tebi kao o prilično gadnom čoveku kojeg u širokom luku zaobilazim. Having said that - ne nosim kape nikad, a ni kostime. Takođe mrzim male kratkonoge pse i pudlice, i da imam psa to bi bio ili neki džukac sa ulice, ili haski. Šta snob poput tebe misli o meni - za to mi zaista puca...prsluk. A tvoja proseravanja o generalizacijama i partikularnim slučajevima ne vredi ni komentarisati jer je izvlačenje slučaja iz čitavog konteksta naravno besmislena rabota, a ne da mi se gubiti vreme na besmislice.
January 13, 20205 yr 3 minutes ago, Dankan Ajdaho said: Šta snob poput tebe misli o meni - za to mi zaista puca...prsluk. As I said - glup kao kurac.
January 13, 20205 yr 10 minutes ago, Dankan Ajdaho said: Malo malo pa kurac. Nismo došli ovde da se vređamo... :( Pa sa onim ilustracijama deluje ko da si poceo prvi
January 13, 20205 yr 1 hour ago, Leia said: Nego meni pade na pamet i ova bolestina, sta ako je i ovo predstava a obe protagonistkinje tu da nam njihovi puppet masteri bace kosku? Taman da se jos malo zamuti voda i prodube podele, i da zna-se-vec-ko doda jos malo benzina na vatru. Ko je za Plavusu taj podrzava potlacene ali i nasrtaj na sluzbeno lice, ko je za Milicajku taj je za postovanje zakona u drzavi bezakonja, takoreci idealna tema da se inace istomisljenici pocupaju medju sobom. Bilo je slična priča prošle ili pretprošle godine, neka baba upucala biznismena, sličan slučaj samo s mnogo ozbiljnijim posledicama, a ne verujem da je neko organizovao predstavu da biznismen popije metak.
January 13, 20205 yr Što su neuporedivi? I onda je bila gomila ljudi (ne ovde, inače po netu) koji su tražili da se ona oslobodi ako se dobro sećam.
January 13, 20205 yr 11 minutes ago, Time Crisis said: Bilo je slična priča prošle ili pretprošle godine, neka baba upucala biznismena, sličan slučaj samo s mnogo ozbiljnijim posledicama, a ne verujem da je neko organizovao predstavu da biznismen popije metak. Realno i mozemo samo da nagadjamo, ja samo rekoh da nije iskljucena ni varijanta da je u pitanju jos jedna sns bolestina.
January 13, 20205 yr Neko na redditu okači principe reforme Britanske policije iz 1829.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peelian_principles#Nine_principles_of_policing Pa eto, možda će za 600 godina biti manje razloga da se lemaju komunalci... Spoiler Nine principles were set out in the "General Instructions" issued to every new police officer in the Metropolitan Police from 1829.[1][9] Although Peel discussed the spirit of some of these principles in his speeches and other communications, the historians Susan Lentz and Robert Chaires found no proof that he compiled a formal list.[10] The Home Office has suggested that the instructions were probably written, not by Peel himself, but by Charles Rowan and Richard Mayne, the joint Commissioners of the Metropolitan Police when it was founded.[1][9] The nine principles were as follows: To prevent crime and disorder, as an alternative to their repression by military force and severity of legal punishment. To recognise always that the power of the police to fulfil their functions and duties is dependent on public approval of their existence, actions and behaviour, and on their ability to secure and maintain public respect. To recognise always that to secure and maintain the respect and approval of the public means also the securing of the willing co-operation of the public in the task of securing observance of laws. To recognise always that the extent to which the co-operation of the public can be secured diminishes proportionately the necessity of the use of physical force and compulsion for achieving police objectives. To seek and preserve public favour, not by pandering to public opinion, but by constantly demonstrating absolutely impartial service to law, in complete independence of policy, and without regard to the justice or injustice of the substance of individual laws, by ready offering of individual service and friendship to all members of the public without regard to their wealth or social standing, by ready exercise of courtesy and friendly good humour, and by ready offering of individual sacrifice in protecting and preserving life. To use physical force only when the exercise of persuasion, advice and warning is found to be insufficient to obtain public co-operation to an extent necessary to secure observance of law or to restore order, and to use only the minimum degree of physical force which is necessary on any particular occasion for achieving a police objective. To maintain at all times a relationship with the public that gives reality to the historic tradition that the police are the public and that the public are the police, the police being only members of the public who are paid to give full-time attention to duties which are incumbent on every citizen in the interests of community welfare and existence. To recognise always the need for strict adherence to police-executive functions, and to refrain from even seeming to usurp the powers of the judiciary, of avenging individuals or the State, and of authoritatively judging guilt and punishing the guilty. To recognise always that the test of police efficiency is the absence of crime and disorder, and not the visible evidence of police action in dealing with them.
January 13, 20205 yr Vremeje za temu, kupujete li kod švercera i zašto ne? ... Shiit has hit the fan...
January 13, 20205 yr Apropo "pravdanja nasilja", ne znam jel neko već pomenuo, ali mnogi ljudi su željni pravde i to reklo bi se sve više one preke i direktne ("karma"), a sve manje "spore i dostižne". Naravno da ne treba tako da bude, ali kad se društvo polarizuje i izdeli do pucanja, na kraju negde i pukne. Srećom bez većih posledica u ovom slučaju.
January 13, 20205 yr 6 minutes ago, Time Crisis said: Apropo "pravdanja nasilja", ne znam jel neko već pomenuo, ali mnogi ljudi su željni pravde i to reklo bi se sve više one preke i direktne ("karma"), a sve manje "spore i dostižne". Naravno da ne treba tako da bude, ali kad se društvo polarizuje i izdeli do pucanja, na kraju negde i pukne. Srećom bez većih posledica u ovom slučaju. Ljudi su svi nabijeni nervozom i pred pucanjem. Ja mislim vec neko vreme da otvorim temu "da li smo otisli u kurac, kada i zasto" Problem postaje to sto je svaka komunikacija medju ljudima agresivna, sto je ljubaznost skoro nemoguce naci i svi su jedni drugima vukovi, umesto da se pomazemo i idemo napred. To bukvalno vidim na svakom koraku. Stres, brzina i ujedanje Edited January 13, 20205 yr by Ravanelli
Create an account or sign in to comment