naucni vocap - kad necete da smarate posten svet

[mei]

:D ja sam na pismeni ispit iz kvante otisla dan ranije i cudila se sto nigde nikoga nema.a deadline za phd tezu sam mislila da je 2 meseca kasnije :( (i moj mentor i ja, posto smo oboje bili novi u ovim ulogama :)). jedva sam prezivela 20 i kusur dana pisanja posto sam mislila da je moguce sve skuckati i spakovati u tom roku. mentor na mountainbikingu u brit. kolumbiji, razmenjujemo komentare i pisanija svaki drugi dan mejlom, malo je falilo da postignemo nemoguce.

Edited May 29, 2013 by mei

[Razzmatazz]

Je l' može neko stručan da mi objasni uzrok navlake na zevanje (ono kad neko pored tebe zevne pa kreneš i ti) i zašto se to dešava samo sa zevanjem.

[Amelija]

kod mene zevanje kako tako, nekad da nekad ne, ali ako nekog vidim (čujem) da pije vodu obavezno moram i ja

[Prospero]

THE ETHICISTCan I Use the Same Paper for Multiple College Courses?By CHUCK KLOSTERMANPublished: May 31, 2013 360 CommentsWhen I was in college, I’d sometimes write a single paper that would satisfy assignments in more than one course. For instance, I once wrote a paper on how “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock” expressed satire; I submitted it for assignments in both my poetry course as well as my completely separate satire course. I did not disclose this to either professor. When I share this with people, half call the practice cheating, and the other half call it genius. My niece told me it would certainly be grounds for expulsion at her college. In my mind, I was adding a level of intellectual complexity to my studies. Was this an ethical practice, or was I cheating? JOE, CONNECTICUT[/size]As I read and reread this question, I find myself fixated on the idea that this must be unethical, somehow. I suppose my knee-jerk reaction could be described like this: Every professor is operating from the position that any assignment she makes is exclusive to that particular class, even if she doesn’t expressly say so at the onset (in other words, it’s simply assumed that work done for a specific class will be used only for that specific class). It’s as if you were breaking a rule that was so over-the-top obvious it may not have been overtly outlined. But you know what? The more I think this over, the more I find myself agreeing with your position. I don’t think this is cheating. I wouldn’t say it qualifies as “genius,” and it might get you expelled from some universities. Yet I can’t isolate anything about this practice that harms other people, provides you with an unfair advantage or engenders an unjustified reward.I look at it like this: You were essentially asked two questions that shared a common answer. The fact that you could see commonalities between unrelated intellectual disciplines is a point in your favor. Some might call your actions self-plagiarism, but the very premise of stealing your own creative property is absurd. You’re not betraying the public’s trust. It seems strange only because the assignments involve a degree of creativity. If this had been a multiple-choice physics test you failed to study for — yet were still able to pass, based on knowledge you acquired from an applied-math class taken the previous semester — no one would question your veracity.It’s possible to argue that you were “cheating yourself” and wasting your own academic experience — but that’s not an ethical crossroads. That’s more of an existential dilemma over the purpose of a college education that (in all probability) you paid for. In the abstract, the notion of using the same paper twice feels wrong — and if you contacted your old school and told them this anecdote, it would most likely cite some rule of conduct you unknowingly broke. But fuzzy personal feelings and institutional rules do not dictate ethics. You fulfilled both assignments with your own work. You’re a clever, lazy person.

[betty]

ode to the brainhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JB7jSFeVz1U

[fonTelefon]

Sad smo ga nagrabusili Obama je dao pare za prckanju po mozgu.

Edited June 12, 2013 by fonTelefon

[Prospero]

http://hnn.us/articles/being-professor-will-no-longer-be-viable-career"Being a Professor Will No Longer Be a Viable Career."By David Austin Walsh6-13-13The academic freedom of professors is under siege, Cary Nelson, former president of the American Association of University Professors said during his opening remarks for that organization's annual meeting in Washington D.C. yesterday. Universities are threatening to hijack the intellectual property rights of faculty members over their course material, he argued, and the consequences of that could be extreme.“If we lose this battle for intellectual property,” Nelson said, “it's over. Being a professor will no longer be a viable career. It will be a service industry. That's it.”Nelson said that the advent of massive online open courses – commonly referred to as MOOCs – offer the potential for tremendous disruption not just in terms of jobs and educational options for students, but professors' control over their course content.In the past, professors typically held the intellectual property rights for their courses, largely because unlike with patents, course content was not profitable for the university. MOOCs, however, offer the potential to monetize individual classes. Coursera and other MOOC providers typically have language in their contracts explicitly granting universities an ownership stake in online content; however, universities do not necessarily share that stake with the faculty members who actually create the content.“MOOCs do not need ownership,” Nelson said. “It's bullshit. … Do you want to be locked out of your own course?”The end result of this marketplace logic, Nelson warned, will be colleges and universities arguing that they have a financial interest in any content produced by a professor, up to and including books and their royalties.“This is an issue serious enough to strike over if you are a collective-bargaining campus,” Nelson said, arguing that it may even be preferable to sacrifice salary increases in favor of protecting intellectual property rights.There is a professor on his campus, he noted, who made nearly half a million dollars from one of his textbooks. That's nearly five times his annual salary.To combat the threat, the AAUP is issuing a book full of recommendations for collective faculty contract negotiations through the University of Illinois press, along with web resources.MOOCsThe disruptive potential of MOOCs filled many presenters with dread.MOOCs are “techno-utopian” enterprises, said Steven Weiland, a professor of educational administration at Michigan State University. He argued there's a tremendous amount of elitism wrapped up in the arguments of MOOC proponents.Thomas Friedman, the New York Times columnist who has been one of the great popularizers of online education, often argues that “average is over, Weiland said. “To the people at Cambridge (Mass.) and Palo Alto, average is indeed over. There's people at Harvard, MIT, and Stanford, and there's people who are average.” Faculty at a Midwestern regional university, he said, are hopelessly “average” compared to Harvard faculty like Gregory Nagy, a popular classics professor who will be leading one of his most famous classes on Greek heroes on edX in the fall."Average” faculty, Weiland said, will be subject to the kind of unsympathetic management advocated by foundation heads like William G. Bowen, president emeritus of the Mellon Foundation, who wrote in a recent book that “the days are over when faculty can ... expect to have complete control over the tools they use.” Bowen didn't mean faculty like Nagy or Michael Sandel, Weiland said. He meant professors like Weiland himself, and most of those present at the AAUP.Still, others were more optimistic. Rochelle Smith, a professor of English at Frostburg State University in Maryland, told a group that her department, when pressured by their administration to redesign a freshman writing course “for the twenty-first century,” decided to focus on the “soul” of the course -- the writer-reader relationship -- as opposed to merely teaching the “powerful magic” of “wikis, web clouds, and woordles,” while at the same time acknowledging their importance. Heather Kenny, who teaches in the professional studies faculty at Edinboro University of Pennsylvnia, presented a “best online education practices” paper to the rapt attention of her audience.And even critics of online education -- and MOOCs in particular -- acknowledged the potential of the format to reach hitherto disenfranchised students around the globe. As one professor from Ethiopia said, MOOCs grant access to more and more students around the world. “Students in sub-Saharan Africa are getting knowledge directly from Stanford and Harvard professors.” That's never happened before.

[Indy]

Ne mogu da verujem da iko uzima Thomasa Friedmana ozbiljno.. covek je 1 klaun.

[Dr Arslanagić]

6 meseci rekonstruišem organizacionu strukturu i delovanje 1 institucije iz perioda okupacije i onda na kraju nađem referat gde sve to lepo piše na 2 strane kucanog teksta.

Edited June 15, 2013 by Arbeitmann

[Aineko]

mislila sam da mozda ovo treba da ide na naucne radove zanimljive siroj javnosti, ali ipak je za ovde, posto mi je zanimljivo iskljucivo zbog komentara :D : Psychobiotics: A Novel Class of Psychotropic

Here, we define a psychobiotic as a live organism that, when ingested in adequate amounts, produces a health benefit in patients suffering from psychiatric illness. As a class of probiotic, these bacteria are capable of producing and delivering neuroactive substances such as gamma-aminobutyric acid and serotonin, which act on the brain-gut axis. Preclinical evaluation in rodents suggests that certain psychobiotics possess antidepressant or anxiolytic activity. Effects may be mediated via the vagus nerve, spinal cord, or neuroendocrine systems. So far, psychobiotics have been most extensively studied in a liaison psychiatric setting in patients with irritable bowel syndrome, where positive benefits have been reported for a number of organisms including Bifidobacterium infantis. Evidence is emerging of benefits in alleviating symptoms of depression and in chronic fatigue syndrome. Such benefits may be related to the anti-inflammatory actions of certain psychobiotics and a capacity to reduce hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity. Results from large scale placebo-controlled studies are awaited.

i komentari sa jednog boarda:

Psychobiotics: A Novel Class of Psychotropic: That's probiotic yoghurt to me!

Sounds more like "we're discovering that the causes of a lot of presumed-psychological disorders are completely physiological. But that doesn't sound so good for our job prospects, so instead we're re-labeling physiological treatments to make them sound more psychological."

:)

[betty]

aaaaaaaaaaaaaa izgleda da ce nam ipak poci za rukom da odemo na oksford! :wub:muz je uspeo da nadje lovu za godinu dana sa mogucnoscu produzenja, a meni je potencijalni mentor rekao da ce vec nekako naci neku kintu cak i ako ne dobijemo grant iz prve.imacemo bebonju sa savrsenim engleskim akcentom ^_^

[gospa buba]

chestitam beto, a vama povjesnichari hvala, meni je svaki info dobar, nego da mrem u neznanju <_<ovaj narod sto ima kredite crkava zbog plate :ph34r:nego, jesu li drushtvenjacima, koji nisu instituti, platili projekte za proshli mesec, nekima, ili nisu nikom?

[Prospero]

čestitke betty :heart:i da odgajite pravu malu lejdi ili pravog malog džentlmena :)

hehe očekivano. još samo čekamo da ukinu kategorije pa da sve bude kao ranije.biće jebeno, mi pare za časopis nismo dobili 2 godine

kolega i ja spremamo neki zbornik pa očekujemo konkurs krajem juna al se šuška da od njega neće biti ništa.

[Indy]

aaaaaaaaaaaaaa izgleda da ce nam ipak poci za rukom da odemo na oksford!

imacemo bebonju sa savrsenim engleskim akcentom ^_^

Hehe

[Dr Arslanagić]

kolega i ja spremamo neki zbornik pa očekujemo konkurs krajem juna al se šuška da od njega neće biti ništa.

mi spremili jedan, izlazi za otprilike mesec dana. samizdat.