noskich Posted June 9, 2022 Author Posted June 9, 2022 On 28.5.2022. at 20:23, dragance said: Kada si ti poslednji put uzeo “par meseci off”? 2019-te.
noskich Posted June 11, 2022 Author Posted June 11, 2022 Demokracija koja tvrdi da prestavlja narod, a jedna trecina tog naroda ne poseduje nijednu nekretninu i zivi u iznajmljenom stanu ili kuci. Pa jel ima u Senatu ili Parlamentu ijedna osoba koja ne poseduje nijednu nekretninu i zivi u iznajmljenom stanu ili kuci? https://www.tenants.org.au/blog/do-politicans-vote-their-property-interests#:~:text=49 MPs average 2.1 properties,possible landlords of residential premises.&text=23 MPs average 2.3 properties,possible landlords of residential premises.&text=46 MPs average 1.6 properties,possible landlords of residential premises. NSW Parliament 133 Members of the NSW Parliament own 256 properties; average number of properties owned is 1.9 and the highest disclosed is 10. 42 are landlords of residential properties and a further 10 are possible landlords of residential properties: that is, up to 39% of MPs are landlords of residential premises. Legislative Council Legislative Assembly 41 Members of the Legislative Council (excluding 1 new MLC) own 69 properties; average number of properties owned is 1.7 and the highest number owned is 6. 11 are landlords of residential properties and a further 6 are possible landlords of residential properties: up to 42% are landlords of residential premises. 92 Members of the Legislative Assembly (excluding 1 new MLA) own 187 properties; average number of properties owned is 2.0 and the highest number owned is 10. 31 are landlords of residential properties and a further 4 are possible landlords of residential properties: up to 38% are landlords of residential premises. Party Affiliation Liberal Party 49 MPs average 2.1 properties and 39% are landlords or possible landlords of residential premises. National Party 23 MPs average 2.3 properties and 48% are landlords or possible landlords of residential premises. Labor Party 46 MPs average 1.6 properties and 33% are landlords or possible landlords of residential premises. The Greens 6 MPs (excluding 1 new MLC) average 2.2 properties and 83% are landlords or possible landlords of residential premises. Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party 3 MPs own one property each. None appear to be a landlord of residential premises. Christian Democratic Party 2 MPs own one property each. Neither appears to be a landlord of residential premises. Animal Justice Party 1 MP owns one property. They do not appear to be a landlord of residential premises. Independents 3 Independents (excluding 1 new MLA) average 2.0 properties and two are landlords or possible landlords of residential premises. Unfortunately the information above is not the full story. There are possibly properties we don't know about: undisclosed because they are held by companies, trusts and self-managed super funds. Some, but not all, MPs do declare such properties. Others keep them out of the public gaze through the disclosure rules. For example, it is clear that properties owned by the spouses of politicians don't generally need to be disclosed, but it is likely to cause some change in the way a politician votes. Whilst most MP’s don’t declare this information because it is discretionary, some (from across the political spectrum) do. At the same time, some assert that when deciding whether they need to declare a property 'income' is interpreted to mean 'net' income - which may end up meaning a negatively geared property held by a trust never needs to be declared at all.
noskich Posted June 21, 2022 Author Posted June 21, 2022 Dobro je sve dok malo kraduckaju: https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/explanation-sought-for-25m-price-tag-to-fly-aboriginal-flag-on-harbour-bridge-20220620-p5av4s.html $25 million price tag to add the Aboriginal flag to the Sydney Harbour Bridge
noskich Posted June 21, 2022 Author Posted June 21, 2022 Pravi Ozi koji nema para zube da popravi. Heroj.
noskich Posted June 22, 2022 Author Posted June 22, 2022 Kako ono beshe, u plutokratiji je makar pravo svojine zagarantovano? Jeste, ali samo za plutokrate, za raju NIJE!
peralozac Posted July 3, 2022 Posted July 3, 2022 I tako, google pametnica razmišlja - hm, vidi ovog sredovečnog baticu, melburnška IP adresa, a gleda Utisak nedelje, hm, pardon, sluša, uključen mu je Driving ka kući, hm, inače svaki dan od jutra do sutra visi na desnom PPP forumu, ma ne trošim ni milisekundu više, imam sasvršenu reklamu:
noskich Posted July 15, 2022 Author Posted July 15, 2022 https://www.maitlandmercury.com.au/story/7819769/we-are-young-and-we-are-tired-stories-from-the-frontline-of-australias-home-crisis/ Australia's cost of living and regional housing crisis through young people's eyes "If she has no children, no out-of-pocket medical expenses, no pets, no other personal debt, no accidents or major illnesses, rarely if ever eats out, has few hobbies, and doesn't travel at all, she could save a maximum of $77 a week. If only."
dragance Posted July 15, 2022 Posted July 15, 2022 Koliko naplacujes kiriju svojim stanarima u kući koju si kupio i izrabljuješ tu istu sirotinju? Da li dizes stanarinu sa rastom inflacije kao pravi plutokrata?
noskich Posted July 15, 2022 Author Posted July 15, 2022 9 minutes ago, dragance said: Koliko naplacujes kiriju svojim stanarima u kući koju si kupio i izrabljuješ tu istu sirotinju? Da li dizes stanarinu sa rastom inflacije kao pravi plutokrata? Ne batice, drzim ispod market price.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now