Bane5 Posted February 23, 2011 Posted February 23, 2011 (edited) Roger, to je od danas. pokusavaju da kazu da je sve u redu, prodavnice rade, a svi gradjani su ponosni i mrze drogirane horde koje im ruse mir i drzavu plus pokusavaju da stave do znanja da su to izvestaji iz raznih gradova, ne samo iz tripolija. Edited February 23, 2011 by Bane5
luba Posted February 23, 2011 Posted February 23, 2011 ja sam danas iscitavala zelenu knjigu sto i vama preporucujem.ali posto ste sigurno lenji, evo par istina koje su mi otvorile oci. The transformation of existing societies of wage-earners into those of partners is inevitable as a dialectical outcome of the contradictory economic theories prevailing in the world today. It is also a dialectical outcome of the unjust relationship based on the wage system. None of these issues have been resolved to date.The antagonistic force of the trade unions in the capitalist world is capable of replacing capitalistic wage societies by a society of partnerships. The possibility of a socialist revolution starts by producers taking over their share of the production. Consequently, the aims of the producers' strikes will change from demanding increases in wages to controlling their share in production. Guided by THE GREEN BOOK , this will sooner or later take place. The final step is for the new socialist society to reach a stage in which profit and money disappear. Society will become fully productive; the material needs of society will be met. In this final stage, profit will disappear, as will the need for money.The recognition of profit is an acknowledgment of exploitation, for profit has no limit. Attempts so far to limit profit by various means have been reformative, not radical, intending to prohibit exploitation of man by man. The final solution lies in eradicating profit, but because profit is the dynamic force behind the economic process, eliminating profit is not a matter of decree but, rather, an outcome of the evolving socialist process. This solution can be attained when the material satisfaction of the needs of society and its members is achieved. Work to increase profit will itself lead to its final eradication. Women are females and men are males. According to gynaecologists, women menstruate every month or so, while men, being male, do not menstruate or suffer during the monthly period. A woman, being a female, is naturally subject to monthly bleeding. When a woman does not menstruate, she is pregnant. If she is pregnant, she becomes, due to pregnancy, less active for about a year, which means that all her natural activities are seriously reduced until she delivers her baby. When she delivers her baby or has a miscarriage, she suffers puerperium, a condition attendant on delivery or miscarriage. As man does not get pregnant, he is not liable to the conditions which women, being female, suffer. Afterwards a woman may breast-feed the baby she bore. Breast-feeding continues for about two years. Breastfeeding means that a woman is so inseparable from her baby that her activity is seriously reduced. She becomes directly responsible for another person whom she assists in his or her biological functions; without this assistance that person would die. The man, on the other hand, neither conceives nor breast-feeds. End of gynaecological statement! Humans, being backward, are still unable to speak one common language. Until this human aspiration is attained, which seems impossible, the expression of joy and sorrow, of what is good and bad, beautiful and ugly, comfortable and miserable, mortal and eternal, love and hatred, the description of colours, sentiments, tastes and moods - all will be expressed according to the language each person speaks spontaneously. Behaviour itself will result from the reaction produced by the feeling that the language creates in the speaker's mind.
Marvin (Paranoid Android) Posted February 23, 2011 Posted February 23, 2011 while men, being male, do not suffer during the monthly period.Kakav nemač pojma.
Tutankamon Posted February 23, 2011 Posted February 23, 2011 iyad_elbaghdadi Iyad El-Baghdadi Reports from Tajoura of a mercenary attack underway. #Feb17 #Libya
ultra plasticni Posted February 23, 2011 Posted February 23, 2011 An effigy representing Libyan Leader Moammar Gadhafi, marked with a Star of David on its forehead, hangs from a flagpole in Benghazi, Libya Wednesday, Feb. 23, 2011. Militiamen loyal to Moammar Gadhafi clamped down in Tripoli Wednesday, but cracks in his regime spread elsewhere across the nation, as the protest-fueled rebellion controlling much of eastern Libya claimed new gains closer to the capital.
Gonzo Posted February 23, 2011 Posted February 23, 2011 (edited) The final solution lies in eradicating profit, but because profit is the dynamic force behind the economic process, eliminating profit is not a matter of decree but, rather, an outcome of the evolving socialist process. damja pokraden! Edited February 23, 2011 by Gonzo
Аврам Гојић Posted February 23, 2011 Posted February 23, 2011 (edited) Nešto dokonam sam sa sobom: Libija je dokaz zašto je nacijama potrebna jaka vojska. Tamo gde vojska ne može da nadjača diktatora, dolazi do scenarija kao što je ovaj. Gadafi je decenijama vredno radio na slabljenju libijske armije i to ga sada održava na kakvoj-takvoj vlasti. Edited February 23, 2011 by Marko M. Dabovic
Eraserhead Posted February 23, 2011 Posted February 23, 2011 Finansijske institucije su počele da spuštaju ratinge građevinskim kompanijama koje posluju u Libiji i na severu Afrike. Sledeće na udaru su one koje su zavisne od naftnih derivata.
hattori Posted February 23, 2011 Posted February 23, 2011 na libijskoj drzavnoj tv trenutno ide nastup neke libijske cece,samo sto daleko manje zavija.^_^
ndjordjevic Posted February 23, 2011 Posted February 23, 2011 vidim, ovde se vise veruje finansiranim medijima koji su sto puta dokazali nepristrasnost, nego ljudima koji su bili tamo, medju kojima niko ne govori o nekakvim masakrima, bombardovanjima civila i ostalim lazima.
Аврам Гојић Posted February 23, 2011 Posted February 23, 2011 vidim, ovde se vise veruje finansiranim medijima koji su sto puta dokazali nepristrasnost, nego ljudima koji su bili tamo, medju kojima niko ne govori o nekakvim masakrima, bombardovanjima civila i ostalim lazima.
Далибор Posted February 23, 2011 Posted February 23, 2011 http://www.pressonline.rs/sr/vesti/vesti_dana/story/152172/DRAMATI%C4%8CNO%3A+%C4%8Cetvoro+Srba+ranjeno+u+Libiji!.html
beeva Posted February 23, 2011 Posted February 23, 2011 (edited) Jedno pitanje upucenima..koliki je zapravo uticaj plemena prilikom neke buduce podjele/obrazovanja vlasti? Koliko vidim, poslovan odnos su imali sa Gadafijem, sumnjam da bilo kome spolja (UN, EU..)ko bude manje ili vise ucestvovao u stabilizaciji nece traziti isto.. Edited February 23, 2011 by beeva
Recommended Posts