Roger Sanchez Posted August 10, 2016 Posted August 10, 2016 Na PPP-u je svakako za nju tough audience, ipak je ona dušmaninova™ hanuma.
Meazza Posted August 10, 2016 Posted August 10, 2016 (edited) QED. Zbunjujes me. Hoces da kazes da nije ratni zlocinac neko ko komanduje vojskom koja cini ratne zlocine? Kako je to uopste debatable? Edited August 10, 2016 by IndridCold
iDemo Posted August 10, 2016 Posted August 10, 2016 To sto je neko ratni zlocinac ne znaci da ce se naci sud da ga za te zlocine uopste uzme u razmatranje - nema ih nadleznih. Naravno, i tamo gde ima nadleznih (kao u slucaju rahmetli gradjanina Slobodana M.) desi se da neumitna smrt odradi svoje pre nego sto se proces privede kraju. Sve ovo iz razloga sto nasi narodi i nashe narodnosti najvishe vole da barataju & mashu sudskim presudama...
Roger Sanchez Posted August 11, 2016 Posted August 11, 2016 HB2 continues to spell trouble for Pat McCrory. Only 30% of voters in the state support it to 43% who are opposed. By a 12 point margin voters say the way McCrory has handled the issue makes them less likely to vote for him- 43% less likely compared to only 31% who say it makes them more likely to support him. There's a good chance that if not for HB2 McCrory would be favored for reelection at this point. We continue to find 2 overwhelming sentiments when it comes to HB 2:1) Voters overwhelmingly think it's hurting the state. 58% say it's hurting North Carolina to only 22% who think it's helping. Specifically on the issue of the economy 58% say it's hurting the state to just 8% who think it's helping. When we last polled that question in June only 49% thought it was hurting the state's economy so the high profile cancellation of the NBA All Star game may be helping to fuel those numbers. Even Republicans by a 24 point margin grant the impact HB2 is having on the state economy is more negative than positive. Additionally 55% of voters think HB2 is hurting North Carolina's reputation nationally, while only 19% think it's having a positive effect on the state.2) Voters don't think HB2 is actually having the impact it's supposedly intended to have. Just 29% think it's made North Carolina safer, to 50% who say it hasn't made the state safer. A lot of the rhetoric around HB2 has focused on its helping make women safer but only 21% of them think it's had that effect to 54% who say it has not. Culture wars only get you so far
WTF Posted August 12, 2016 Posted August 12, 2016 Culture wars only get you so far Ne pominji mi to sranje od guvernera. HB2, pa voter supression zakon , pa cover up o zagadjenju (a zagdjivala njegova firma), pa skandali sa HHS i drzavnom bezbednosti, do sutra mogu da brojim. Sad ide okolo sa Trumpom i namece se kao jedan od vecih apologista za "2nd amendment" komentar. A izabran je bio kao "moderate, pro-business Republican", samo je sredinom mandata skrenuo u zesce desnokrilno mamojebstvo. Zato nikad ne bih mogao da glasam za Jeba, Rubia ili nekog slicnog GOP moderate kandidata da su pobedili Trumpa.
Roger Sanchez Posted August 12, 2016 Posted August 12, 2016 The people in these communities who are voting Republican in larger proportions are those who are a notch or two up the economic ladder — the sheriff’s deputy, the teacher, the highway worker, the motel clerk, the gas station owner and the coal miner. And their growing allegiance to the Republicans is, in part, a reaction against what they perceive, among those below them on the economic ladder, as a growing dependency on the safety net, the most visible manifestation of downward mobility in their declining towns. These are voters like Pamela Dougherty, a 43-year-old nurse I encountered at a restaurant across from a Walmart in Marshalltown, Iowa, where she’d come to hear Rick Santorum, the conservative former Pennsylvania senator with a working-class pitch, just before the 2012 Iowa caucuses. In a lengthy conversation, Ms. Dougherty talked candidly about how she had benefited from government support. After having her first child as a teenager, marrying young and divorcing, Ms. Dougherty had faced bleak prospects. But she had gotten safety-net support — most crucially, taxpayer-funded tuition breaks to attend community college, where she’d earned her nursing degree. She landed a steady job at a nearby dialysis center and remarried. But this didn’t make her a lasting supporter of safety-net programs like those that helped her. Instead, Ms. Dougherty had become a staunch opponent of them. She was reacting, she said, against the sense of entitlement she saw on display at the dialysis center. The federal government has for years covered kidney dialysis treatment in outpatient centers through Medicare, regardless of patients’ age, partly on the logic that treatment allows people with kidney disease to remain productive. But, Ms. Dougherty said, only a small fraction of the 54 people getting dialysis at her center had regular jobs.“People waltz in when they want to,” she said, explaining that, in her opinion, there was too little asked of patients. There was nothing that said “‘You’re getting a great benefit here, why not put in a little bit yourself.’ ” At least when she got her tuition help, she said, she had to keep up her grades. “When you’re getting assistance, there should be hoops to jump through so that you’re paying a price for your behavior,” she said. “What’s wrong with that?”Yes, citizens like Ms. Dougherty are at one level voting against their own economic self-interest, to the extent that the Republican approach on taxes is slanted more to the wealthy than that of the Democrats. This was the thesis of Thomas Frank’s 2004 best seller, “What’s the Matter With Kansas,” which argued that these voters had been distracted by social issues like guns and abortion. But on another level, these voters are consciously opting against a Democratic economic agenda that they see as bad for them and good for other people — specifically, those undeserving benefit-recipients who live nearby. Welfare state jedu njezina vlastita djeca. (podsjeća i na UK)
Weenie Pooh Posted August 12, 2016 Posted August 12, 2016 Auh "You’re getting a great benefit here, why not put in a little bit yourself.""When you’re getting assistance, there should be hoops to jump through so that you’re paying a price for your behavior," Završila stoka višu školu, postala 1 medicinska sestra, a onda mudro zaključila da država previše čašćava ljude faličnih bubrega. Htela bi da ih se natera da dube na glavi i tako bar malo ispaštaju, a ne samo da dignu noge i uživaju u svojoj džabe dijalizi. Iskreno joj želim da jednog dana dobrovoljno eksplodira od akumulacije svog zatrovanog urina, u inat Nanny State.
Gandalf Posted August 12, 2016 Posted August 12, 2016 Iskreno joj želim da jednog dana dobrovoljno eksplodira od akumulacije svog zatrovanog urina, u inat Nanny State. +tisucu
hazard Posted August 13, 2016 Posted August 13, 2016 Welfare state jedu njezina vlastita djeca. (podsjeća i na UK) A možda je problem u tome što su ti "undeserving benefit recipients" tamo neki crnci i latinosi dobrim delom? Mislim, ne znam, ali često tako ispadne...
WTF Posted August 13, 2016 Posted August 13, 2016 A možda je problem u tome što su ti "undeserving benefit recipients" tamo neki crnci i latinosi dobrim delom? Mislim, ne znam, ali često tako ispadne... Pa da. White skin = deserving. Black/brown skin = not deserving.
Recommended Posts