iDemo Posted July 10, 2016 Posted July 10, 2016 Da je sila, pucanje, danas mnogo vise i sire prihvacen metod resavanja problema nego sto je to bila u poslednjih 50-ak godina. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_State_shootings The Kent State shootings (also known as the May 4 massacre or the Kent State massacre)[1][2][3] occurred at Kent State University in Kent, Ohio, in the United States and involved the shooting of unarmed college students by the Ohio National Guard on Monday, May 4, 1970. 4 mrtvih, 8 ranjenih, svi u proseku na po 80-150 metara od Nacionalne Garde u akciji... Eight of the guardsmen were indicted by a grand jury. The guardsmen claimed to have fired in self-defense, a claim that was generally accepted by the criminal justice system. In 1974 U.S. District Judge Frank Battisti dismissed charges against all eight on the basis that the prosecution's case was too weak to warrant a trial.[8] Pucanja, sudjenja i drame je uvek bilo - jedino sto sad svak ziv ima (tnx to rahmetli S. Jobs) smartphone pa se to kachi na socijalne medije samo tamo...
maximus Posted July 10, 2016 Posted July 10, 2016 crnci imaju fiksaciju da svaki put kad ih pandur pulloveruje to je zbog toga sto su vozili while black I onda nastaje problem - pandur hoce da cuje sir, how you doin today, a vozac mu daje NWA fuck tha police attitude mic po mic pandur ukapira da je pulloverovao 1 black militanta, vozac da ga je pulloverovao 1 black hater cop&shit happens nema potrebe za to - vozi kako treba I pandur te nece pulloverovati usput, pulling drivers over je 1 stara&nepotrebna fora - zasto pundur da zaustavlja free flow of traffic; da zaradi pare za opstinu?
Čutura Posted July 10, 2016 Posted July 10, 2016 crnci imaju fiksaciju da svaki put kad ih pandur pulloveruje to je zbog toga sto su vozili while black I onda nastaje problem - pandur hoce da cuje sir, how you doin today, a vozac mu daje NWA fuck tha police attitude mic po mic pandur ukapira da je pulloverovao 1 black militanta, vozac da ga je pulloverovao 1 black hater cop&shit happens nema potrebe za to - vozi kako treba I pandur te nece pulloverovati usput, pulling drivers over je 1 stara&nepotrebna fora - zasto pundur da zaustavlja free flow of traffic; da zaradi pare za opstinu?
iDemo Posted July 10, 2016 Posted July 10, 2016 usput, pulling drivers over je 1 stara&nepotrebna fora - zasto pundur da zaustavlja free flow of traffic; da zaradi pare za opstinu? mind you da su u #normalnijim zemljama samo oni rendzeri sto naplacuju kazne za parkiranje opstinski...
Radoye Posted July 10, 2016 Posted July 10, 2016 Strah je svakako deo toga, ali ne sme se zanemariti ni nezapamćen broj kamera u svakom uglu koji garantuje da se mnogo veći procenat slučajeva sistemskog iživljavanja bude primećen. Koliko se policija kurčila nekad a koliko sad prosto ne možemo da znamo pouzdano, a ja sam sklon da poverujem da se veća promena desila u našem stepenu tolerancije (zbog upliva tehnologije) nego u njihovim tradicionalnim metodama. Sad, da li ta promena tolerancije znači da smo više oguglali, ili da glasnije kmečimo, ili možda i jedno i drugo... nemam pojma. mobilni telefoni ce napraviti revoluciju. ko zna koliko se i ranije sranja dogadjalo, pa budu zataskana. U buducnosti ce i kamere da snimaju samo ono sto je dozvoljeno da se snima: http://money.cnn.com/2016/06/30/technology/apple-patent-stop-phone-recording/
Lord Protector Posted July 11, 2016 Posted July 11, 2016 (edited) Who Is General Michael Flynn? Justin Raimondo On July 10, 2016 When I first heard that Gen. Michael Flynn, former head of the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) under President Obama, was rumored to be on Donald Trump’s short list for the GOP vice presidential nomination, my ears pricked up. I wrote about Flynn here, and Antiwar.com has covered the controversy surrounding the 2012 DIA report that warned the Obama administration that its policy of regime change in Syria would lead to the rise of a Sunni Islamic “caliphate” in Syria – a warning that fell on deaf ears. Flynn was forced out of his job as DIA director because, he says, his views “did not fit the narrative.” But what narrative is he talking about? In order to understand this intramural fight within the highest levels of the intelligence and military communities, we have to go back to the Bush administration, and the Iraq war. As the US was fighting a losing battle against Iraqi insurgents, Gen. David Petraeus arose to show us the way forward, and the myth of the successful “surge” was born. The Petraeus strategy was to recruit Sunni tribesmen in the Iraqi hinterlands bordering Syria to fight al-Qaeda, to win their “hearts and minds.” In reality, this meant putting them on the American payroll: we’ll never know how many millions of taxpayer dollars went to financing this effort, but no doubt it was a considerable sum. As the tribes took on al-Qaeda, the “surge” was declared a success – but the blowback wasn’t long in coming. These same tribes soon turned against the central government in Baghdad, and their American protectors, while the remnants of al-Qaeda in Iraq migrated across the border to Syria, where they became the core of what morphed into ISIS. Those Sunni “hearts and minds” were now pledging allegiance to Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the “caliph” of the Islamic State. The Petraeus strategy was the logical extension of the Bush administration’s “Sunni turn,” which Seymour Hersh writes about here: “To undermine Iran, which is predominantly Shiite, the Bush Administration has decided, in effect, to reconfigure its priorities in the Middle East. In Lebanon, the Administration has cooperated with Saudi Arabia’s government, which is Sunni, in clandestine operations that are intended to weaken Hezbollah, the Shiite organization that is backed by Iran. The U.S. has also taken part in clandestine operations aimed at Iran and its ally Syria. A by-product of these activities has been the bolstering of Sunni extremist groups that espouse a militant vision of Islam and are hostile to America and sympathetic to Al Qaeda.” Having finished off Iraq, the neocons in the Bush administration were setting their sights on Iran. In league with Prince Bandar, then head of Saudi intelligence – and a close friend of the Bushes and Vice President Dick Cheney – the US covertly allied with Sunni radicals, including the Muslim Brotherhood, to undermine the government of Bashar al-Assad in Syria and bolster opposition to Hezbollah in Lebanon. The Obama administration inherited this strategy and took it to its logical conclusion: giving its imprimatur to the Muslim Brotherhood government in Egypt, open support for Syrian rebels, and the overthrow of Ghadafi in Libya and the handing over of the country to radical Sunni militias. Hillary Clinton, in spite of her self-proclaimed ties to Hosni Mubarak – whom she described as “a friend of the family” – soon jumped on board the Sunni train and became the principal advocate for taking the administration farther down that road. The end of that road was revealed by Petraeus when he came out for support to al-Qaeda’s Syrian franchise in a bid to overthrow Assad. Which brings us back to the 2012 DIA report and Gen. Flynn’s conflict with the Obama administration’s “narrative.” The report was quite explicit about the responsibility of the US and its regional allies – the Saudis, the Qataris, the Gulf emirates – for aiding and abetting the Syrian “opposition,” which led to the creation of ISIS. In an interview with al-Jazeera, Flynn offered his unblinking assessment: Al-Jazeera: You are basically saying that even in government at the time you knew these groups were around, you saw this analysis, and you were arguing against it, but who wasn’t listening? Flynn: I think the administration. Al-Jazeera: So the administration turned a blind eye to your analysis? Flynn: I don’t know that they turned a blind eye, I think it was a decision. I think it was a willful decision. Al-Jazeera: A willful decision to support an insurgency that had Salafists, Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood? Flynn: It was a willful decision to do what they’re doing.” Before serving as head of the DIA, Flynn was the Senior Intelligence officer with JSOC, the elite military command that directs Special Forces operations throughout the world: essentially the spearhead of the fight against terrorism. For him to see Washington pursue a policy of actively aiding our sworn enemies, nurturing the terrorist nests that were springing up in Syria and Libya – all in the name of the “war on terrorism” – was simply too much for him to bear in silence. That DIA report was a direct challenge to the administration’s policy, and it wasn’t long before he was asked to resign, or be fired. Asked if ISIS wouldn’t be where they are today if the invasion of Iraq had never happened, Flynn replied: “Absolutely. …The historic lesson is that it was a strategic failure to go into Iraq.” He added: “First we went to Afghanistan, where al-Qaeda was based. Then we went into Iraq. Instead of asking ourselves why the phenomenon of terror occurred, we were looking for locations. This is a major lesson we must learn in order not to make the same mistakes again.” As Ron Paul put it, “Flynn is no non-interventionist. But he does make the connection between the US invasion of Iraq and the creation of ISIS and other terrorist organizations, and he at least urges us to consider why they seek to attack us.” The War Party is already ginning up a campaign against Flynn, smearing him as a “tool” of the Kremlin because he – like Trump – advocates cooperating with Russia, rather than starting World War III. They point to his attendance at a social function where he – gasp! – actually sat next to Vladimir Putin! The same neo-McCarthyites who point to Trump’s business ties to Russia as “evidence” that he’s a Manchurian candidate, are pushing the same party line against Flynn. What the editors of Politico and the Washington Post don’t understand is that Russophobia is an affliction that almost exclusively infects the political class: ordinary Americans have no interest in starting Cold War II with Russia. Like elite dismay over Brexit, this is a theme that has zero electoral significance outside Washington and New York’s tonier neighborhoods. Both Flynn and Trump take the “war on terrorism” seriously enough to question our crazy policy of aiding jihadists in Libya and Syria, while the Clinton crowd and their journalistic camarilla know it’s a con game — which, of course, they play to the hilt –Â to bamboozle the public into tolerating perpetual warfare. Given the alternatives – e.g. Newt Gingrich and Sen. Jeff Sessions – Trump choosing Flynn as his running mate is the least worst outcome. While, as Ron Paul says, he’s no noninterventionist, on the other hand he’s a rebel against Washington’s “regime change” consensus, an advocate of a common sense approach to Russia, and yet more evidence of Trump’s ability to think outside-the-box. An added plus for political wonks: he’s a registered Democrat, which further breaks down the super-partisan red-blue paradigm that’s done so much to distort American political discourse. Edited July 11, 2016 by slow
Shan Jan Posted July 11, 2016 Posted July 11, 2016 debeli policajac prilazi (belom) čoveku koji se izvlači iz slupanog automobila i iz čista mira ga upucava
Muwan Posted July 13, 2016 Posted July 13, 2016 Na snimku deluje da je u pitanju bila policijska potera za likom u kolima a takvi mu dođu legitiman vojni cilj, uskoro će ih dronovima rokati na autoputu bili naoružani ili ne.
laser lotus Posted July 13, 2016 Posted July 13, 2016 Da, ako se dobro sjećam tip je bježao od policije, a u autu se nalazila i njegova djevojka koja je poginula u prevrtanju. Inače, tip je ostao invalid jer ga je pandur pogodio u kičmu.
Shan Jan Posted July 13, 2016 Posted July 13, 2016 Al meni je potpuno neverovatno sa kojom lakocom je pajkan iso da ga overi. Tu nema uopste straha kod pajkana, to je vise bilo kao, "evo ga mis daj da ga ubijem metlom pa da ga bacim u kantu". Uzas, potpuno mi je suludo, uopste ne shvatam nacin razmisljanja.
Prospero Posted July 13, 2016 Posted July 13, 2016 Half of all US food produce is thrown away, new research suggests The demand for ‘perfect’ fruit and veg means much is discarded, damaging the climate and leaving people hungry Suzanne Goldenberg US environment correspondent @suzyji Wednesday 13 July 2016 06.00 BST Americans throw away almost as much food as they eat because of a “cult of perfection”, deepening hunger and poverty, and inflicting a heavy toll on the environment. Vast quantities of fresh produce grown in the US are left in the field to rot, fed to livestock or hauled directly from the field to landfill, because of unrealistic and unyielding cosmetic standards, according to official data and interviews with dozens of farmers, packers, truckers, researchers, campaigners and government officials. From the fields and orchards of California to the population centres of the east coast, farmers and others on the food distribution chain say high-value and nutritious food is being sacrificed to retailers’ demand for unattainable perfection. “It’s all about blemish-free produce,” says Jay Johnson, who ships fresh fruit and vegetables from North Carolina and central Florida. “What happens in our business today is that it is either perfect, or it gets rejected. It is perfect to them, or they turn it down. And then you are stuck.” Food waste is often described as a “farm-to-fork” problem. Produce is lost in fields, warehouses, packaging, distribution, supermarkets, restaurants and fridges. By one government tally, about 60m tonnes of produce worth about $160bn (£119bn), is wasted by retailers and consumers every year - one third of all foodstuffs. Facebook Twitter Pinterest Edible food dumped by vendors in a New York market. There is a demand for ‘blemish-free produce’ in the industry. Photograph: LA Times/Getty But that is just a “downstream” measure. In more than two dozen interviews, farmers, packers, wholesalers, truckers, food academics and campaigners described the waste that occurs “upstream”: scarred vegetables regularly abandoned in the field to save the expense and labour involved in harvest. Or left to rot in a warehouse because of minor blemishes that do not necessarily affect freshness or quality. When added to the retail waste, it takes the amount of food lost close to half of all produce grown, experts say. “I would say at times there is 25% of the crop that is just thrown away or fed to cattle,” said Wayde Kirschenman, whose family has been growing potatoes and other vegetables near Bakersfield, California, since the 1930s. “Sometimes it can be worse.” ... Je bo te
3opge Posted July 13, 2016 Posted July 13, 2016 Je bo te sve potpuno tacno, Amerika bi mogla samo odbacenom hranom da hrani jos najmanje 300 miliona ljudi.
Radoye Posted July 13, 2016 Posted July 13, 2016 Al meni je potpuno neverovatno sa kojom lakocom je pajkan iso da ga overi. Tu nema uopste straha kod pajkana, to je vise bilo kao, "evo ga mis daj da ga ubijem metlom pa da ga bacim u kantu". Uzas, potpuno mi je suludo, uopste ne shvatam nacin razmisljanja. Razmisljanje je tu potpuno iskljuceno iz procesa. Citao sam negde pre nekog vremena da su istrazivanja nakon Prvog i Drugog svetskog rata zakljucila da samo nekih 15-tak posto americkih vojnika puca u borbi. Oni nisu bezali, ali su odbijali da ubijaju osim u krajnjoj nuzdi. Onda je promenjen trening, bacio se veci fokus na desenzitivisanje regruta na ubijanje pa su se vec u Koreji osetili rezultati toga, da bi preko Vijetnama i pustinjskih oluja dosli na danasnjih prakticno 100%, gde se automatski puca na sve sto mrda. Ideja je da se pucanje ucini refleksnom radnjom, bez ikakve zadrske. Odnedavno (as in: zadnjih 10-15 godina) slicne metode treninga su pocele da se upotrebljavaju i u policiji. O ovome je puno pisano u kanadskim medijima nedavno, nakon par slucajeva pucnjave od strane policajaca, gde je navodno prica isla da su ovi koji su pucali laki na obaracu zato sto su trenirani u SAD koristeci njihove metode zasnovane na vojnoj obuci (vidi ovde: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Sammy_Yatim ).
Recommended Posts