DarkAttraktor Posted December 18, 2010 Author Posted December 18, 2010 Like a work of artLep quote, to je to.
DarkAttraktor Posted December 18, 2010 Author Posted December 18, 2010 Ili evo jos bolje ilustracije za izopacene odnose u ovom sumanutom dobu:Uzmem pre par noci da citam Greenwaldov (koji mi je inace postao neverovatan favorit, hvala puno lubo :)) clanak "NYT - the Nixonian Henchmen of Today" i izadje mi reklama kao i uvek na ulasku u Salon.com, ali ovaj put je reklama za NYT preko celog ekrana
gagorder Posted December 18, 2010 Posted December 18, 2010 Svet u kom slobodari strastveno brane autoritarijanizam, kategorično libertarijanski Reason magazin se baca ljagom na Assangea, a koga opet de facto brani (mada ga "ne podržava") - 1 Glenn Beck!!! ih, pa nadji jednog sezdesetosmasha da nije autoritarac ...
luba Posted December 18, 2010 Posted December 18, 2010 (edited) legalizam na delu:Bank of America halts all transactions for WikiLeaksa zulijan poznaje istoriju, pa odgovara: "Bank of America put out a statement... that it is not willing to transport any transactions by any of its clients to any organisations collecting money on our behalf" "It's a new type of business McCarthyism in the US to deprive this organisation the funds that is needs to survive, to deprive me personally of the funds that my lawyers need to protect me against extradition to the US or to Sweden" Edited December 18, 2010 by luba
luba Posted December 18, 2010 Posted December 18, 2010 zanimljiv kabel, narocito u tajmingu sa martijevim izvestajem. Finally, we turn to one issue where the COE has been both an irritant and, more recently, somewhat of a champion - Guantanamo. Dick Marty, a member of the Swiss delegation to the PACE, conducted an investigation into renditions and "secret prisons" in Europe connected to the U.S. war on terrorism. His work created a great deal of controversy and anti-U.S. sentiment in the COE. More recently, however, SecGen Davis and COE Human Rights Commissioner Hammarberg have called on COE member-states to work with the U.S. and consider accepting detainees from Guantanamo to help the U.S. shut down the detention facility there.
luba Posted December 18, 2010 Posted December 18, 2010 Uzmem pre par noci da citam Greenwaldov (koji mi je inace postao neverovatan favorit, hvala puno lubo :)) odlican je glen, evo ga novi. uspeo je da natera nyt da ispravi materijalne greske, da neumornim podsecanjem na uslove manningovog pritvora (dobro, ne jedini on) natera pentagon da po prvi put progovori o tome The US military on Friday said the army private suspected of passing secret documents to WikiLeaks is being treated humanely in prison, despite accusations of harsh conditions. Held at a military brig at the Quantico Marine base, Bradley Manning has been placed under a maximum security regimen because authorities see him as posing a risk to national security, said prison spokesman First Lieutenant Brian Villiard. "Maximum custody detainees" include "those whose escape would cause concern of a threat to life, property or national security," Villiard told AFP. "What I will tell you is that he is not treated any differently than any other maximum confinement detainee," he said. Under the stricter security rules, Manning is allowed out of his cell for only one hour a day for exercise outside or at an indoor gym, prompting allegations from some commentators that he is enduring abuse. The solitary confinement "constitute cruel and inhumane treatment and, by the standards of many nations, even torture," Glenn Greenwald, a lawyer and author, wrote on Salon.com. The "accused leaker is subjected to detention conditions likely to create long-term psychological injuries," even though Manning has not been convicted of any crime, said Greenwald, who appeared on the MSNBC television network on Friday. The accusations came the same day that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was freed on bail in Britain, as he fights extradition to Sweden on charges of sexual assault. But the military defended the detention conditions for Manning, saying other inmates placed in the highest security category were subject to the same rules. The inmates at the brig "are treated with firmness, fairness, dignity and compassion," Villiard said. But he added: "It's no Shangri-la." Manning has access to newspapers, is within speaking range of other inmates in his wing, is permitted visitors and chooses from the same food menu as his fellow prisoners. But under the maximum security rules, Manning is barred from the mess hall and must take his meals in his solitary cell, while prison authorities have decided not to issue him cotton sheets, he said. Instead, the brig officers have provided two blankets and a pillow made of material that cannot be torn into pieces -- as a "precaution," according to Villiard. Manning, however, was not on a suicide watch and there had been no major problems with his behavior so far, he said. The young soldier was arrested in May and has been held in solitary confinement at the Quantico brig, Virginia, since July. US authorities have yet to say when he will be put on trial on eight charges of violating federal criminal law, including transmitting classified information to a third party, and two counts under military law. If found guilty, Manning faces up to 52 years in prison. The WikiLeaks website has yet to disclose its source for a massive trove of classified US military and diplomatic documents published in recent months, but suspicion has focused on Manning, who worked as a low-ranking army intelligence analyst in Iraq. Assange said Friday that WikiLeaks had pledged 50,000 dollars (38,000 euros) towards Manning's legal fund. But he told ABC television in the US that: "I had never heard of the name Bradley Manning before it was published in the press. "WikiLeaks technology (was) designed from the very beginning to make sure that we never know the identities or names of people submitting us material." a ovo je apsolutni hit:The Pentagon has banned journalists with the popular defense daily Stars and Stripes from consulting leaked diplomatic cables published by WikiLeaks, prompting charges of censorship. "The editorial independence of Stars and Stripes and its readers' right to news free of censorship are being threatened by an overly broad and misdirected response to the Wikileaks debacle," the daily wrote. "Amazingly, the government wants to bar this newspaper's journalists -- along with most federal workers -- from reading information already plastered all over the public square." In the article, the daily's ombudsman Mark Prendergast revealed that the Pentagon communications department had advised that "access to any classified information hosted on non-DoD systems from any government-owned system is expressly prohibited" even if it was now in the public arena. Although Stars and Stripes is officially authorized by the Pentagon it is editorially independent and its journalists are guaranteed the right of freedom of expression contained in the US Constitution. Established in World War II, the magazine has some 420,000 readers and is widely read by serving members of the armed forces deployed abroad. There are four daily editions in Europe, the Middle East, Japan and South Korea. "I am no lawyer, but even if secrets in wide circulation remain 'classified' by legal definition, it simply cannot be held that information disseminated on a global scale a la Wikileaks is somehow not in the 'public domain.' That defies reality," Prendergast wrote in his opinion piece. Stars and Stripes journalists may however continue to consult the websites of those dailies which have published the US diplomatic cables, such as the New York Times and the Washington Post.
Shan Jan Posted December 18, 2010 Posted December 18, 2010 I islo je ka tome al ne mogu da verujem sad kad citam. Vlada ti brani da otvoris oci i pogledas izloge. Democracy at it's best
3opge Posted December 18, 2010 Posted December 18, 2010 podseca na hriscanski radio:"kada prolazite pored radnje sa erotskim vesom okrenite se na drugu stranu, erotski ves je los, erotski ves je iskusenje mracnih sila ali vi znate bolje, vi sledite Hrista"
Shan Jan Posted December 18, 2010 Posted December 18, 2010 Lepo se i vidi kako sistem pokusava da zadrzi pred citaocima samo novine koje su vec sa njim isprepletane: Stars and Stripes journalists may however continue to consult the websites of those dailies which have published the US diplomatic cables, such as the New York Times and the Washington Post.Welcome to the land of opportunity
JozoMujica Posted December 18, 2010 Posted December 18, 2010 BEOGRAD, 18. decembar 2010, (Njuz) – Poznata folk pevačica Viki Miljković do te mere je oduševljena Džulijanom Asanžom, osnivačem sajta Vikiliks, da je odlučila da u znak podrške izvrši manju korekciju na svom umetničkom imenu, koje će se ubuduće pisati Wiki.:D
Al-Khwarizmi Posted December 19, 2010 Posted December 19, 2010 Rap News 6http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hl4NlA97GeQ
Indy Posted December 19, 2010 Posted December 19, 2010 Mmmm... kome ovde verovati? Provereno manipulativnom debeljku, ili Wikileaked diplomatama sa racvastim jezikom?
Weenie Pooh Posted December 19, 2010 Posted December 19, 2010 Aha, Asaaaanž, nećeš u Švedsku? Pa to je upravo ono što bi prljavi manipulativni silovatelj odbio da uradi! QEDA tek ti tvoji bogati groupies što plaćaju kauciju i vređaju švecki pravosudni sistem, pu!
Shan Jan Posted December 19, 2010 Posted December 19, 2010 (edited) Ja mislim da je ova ljubomorna sto nju niko nije sexovao by surprise <_< Edited December 19, 2010 by Shan Jan
Recommended Posts