whistleblowers: wikileaks, snowden i...

[hooyadahoo]

lozite se miki protiv institucije, ko da niste citali 84, mi, ili brave new world. lepo je to.

[Кристофер Лумумбо]

Оу, јеа.

super je ovo, govna su ogoljena i reaguju kao sto bi svaki siledzija reagovao.

[Musharaf]

Ou jea. Gdje je optužnica za šeranje videa sa JWICSa? Da FAUX-N GOPsi ne traže mesa, ne bi ni ovih praznih prijetnji bilo...

Чекај, тражио си одмазду, ниси специфицирао желиш ли празну или пуну.У међувремену, чувари Првог амандмана марширају у савршеној формацији.Умберто Еко.

[Indy]

Komentari Jbm ti kretene naložene gledanjem suviše Jack Bauera.

[Roger Sanchez]

Чекај, тражио си одмазду, ниси специфицирао желиш ли празну или пуну.

Istina. Ono na što sam mislio je da to neće biti progonjenje zvijeri kako se tuder zamišlja. Stvaranje stanovite nelagode je u igri. Kao što sam rekao, mora izgledati ko da im je stalo.

[Gandalf]

MasterCard is pulling the plug on payments to WikiLeaks, a move that will dry up another source of funds for the embattled document-sharing Web site, CNET has learned."MasterCard is taking action to ensure that WikiLeaks can no longer accept MasterCard-branded products," a spokesman for MasterCard Worldwide said today.http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-20024776-281.html

[Indy]

"secrecy is anathema to free society"Čovek koji stavlja "liberty" u "libertarian"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eM1HlfVF4I4

[Indy]

Bonda, bonda... Džejmsa... Fascinantna nova lokacija Wikileaks servera, Bahnhof bunker, Švecka

[Indy]

Pravni momenti, iz australijskog ugla. (BTW, premijerka Gillard je nekakav ekspert za pravo, što je bitno za kontekst članka).

Gillard 'prejudicing Assange's right to trial'Prime Minister Julia Gillard has been accused of possibly prejudicing any future case against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange by claiming he is "guilty of illegality" for leaking US diplomatic cables.Mr Assange is expected to meet with British police sometime in the next 24 hours after Swedish authorities issued a fresh warrant for his arrest over alleged sexual offences.Mr Assange and his lawyers say they will fight any extradition from the UK because they fear he will be handed over to authorities in the US, where he has been dubbed a "high-tech terrorist" and an "enemy combatant".This morning Ms Gillard said: "Let's not try and put any glosses on this. It would not happen, information would not be on WikiLeaks if there had not been an illegal act undertaken.""The Australian Federal Police is going to provide the Government with some advice about potential criminal conduct of the individual involved," she added."People would be aware that there's also the issue of a warrant relating to an alleged sexual assault in Sweden. What I would say about the publication of the WikiLeaks information is it's grossly irresponsible."We've got the Australian Federal Police looking to see whether Australian laws have been broken, and then we've got the commonsense test about the gross irresponsibility of this conduct."But some Australian legal experts question whether Mr Assange has broken any law.Liberty Victoria president Spencer Zifcak says he is shocked by Ms Gillard's statements."I was astonished actually," he said."As a lawyer, and presumably a highly competent one, that in this context she would have made a statement that was so highly inappropriate."One can imagine the reaction of a jury on hearing the person whose trial they're involved in has been said by the Prime Minister to be guilty. I'm really very surprised by it."There is no charge, there is no trial, there is no properly constituted court, and yet the Prime Minister deems it appropriate to say that Mr Assange has committed a criminal offence."That is a statement without foundation, it pre-empts the outcome of any proceedings, it denies him the presumption of innocence and it prejudices his right to fair trial."Lawyers for Mr Assange say Ms Gillard may have behaved illegally by defaming their client.One member of his legal team, Jennifer Robinson, says the Prime Minister's assertion that the website's publication of the documents is illegal goes too far."Her comments were made outside of Parliament so they're certainly not privileged, and I think it was misguided to suggest that he had committed a crime in England and, indeed, defamatory," she said."Although I think that Prime Minister Gillard's account will probably come at the ballot box."Professor Zifcak says WikiLeaks does not seem to have done anything illegal."All WikiLeaks has done is publish documents that have been given to it. Now the interesting thing about that is WikiLeaks is publishing these documents in association with some of the great newspapers of the world."So if WikiLeaks is to be charged with the disclosure of official information then presumably these major newspapers will also be in the guns."But I can't see the authorities, either in Australia or the United States, pursuing those newspapers."Professor Zifcak says he has written to the Prime Minister to express his concern about her comments.The latest publications by WikiLeaks have prompted more accusations of crime.US secretary of state Hillary Clinton says the release of a secret list of critical infrastructure is deeply distressing and the illegal publication of classified information poses real concerns and dangers.But the director of the Centre for International Law at the University of Sydney, Dr Ben Saul, says Mr Assange is the victim of an international smear campaign."Julian Assange has become a target of a kind of global campaign to demonise him as a criminal, as a terrorist," he said."I mean, this is pretty serious stuff. And the Australian Government hasn't said very much on the public record to suggest that they're looking out for his interests in any kind of serious way."Dr Saul says the most likely avenue for prosecuting WikiLeaks is through the development of international laws which protect diplomatic correspondence, but even that would be problematic."We know that some of the disclosures by WikiLeaks have genuinely been in the public interest: that is, disclosure has involved US war crimes, for example, in Afghanistan and Iraq."The disclosure that the US secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, ordered a campaign of espionage against the United Nations secretary-general, I mean, these are properly matters in the public interest."So if the law on diplomatic inviolability is to be extended globally to all kinds of diplomatic information then there really needs to be a kind of exception or carve out for the disclosure of illegal conduct."It doesn't make sense to absolutely protect the inviolability of diplomatic information if that just becomes a shield for government lawlessness."

[Indy]

A evo i 1 otvorenog pisma australijskoj premijerki Gillard, gde se traži samo ono čega je i sama mogla da se seti ("simple commitment to democratic principles and the rule of law"). Velika lista potpisnika, ima i poneko internacionalno ime. Tu su Chomsky i Singer. Između ostalih i poslanik zelenih (Adam Bandt) koga sam neki dan pitao na twitteru "zašto Zeleni ćute o Wikileaks")... pa, dobio sam odgovor (tu je i lider stranke, itd.)

[Sestre Bronte]

Je l' ima negde torent da se to sve skine džumle?

[najgori]

Payback: Bank That Froze Julian Assange's Bank Account Has Now Been Taken Down By Hackers

[scepa]

Bonda, bonda... Džejmsa... Fascinantna nova lokacija Wikileaks servera, Bahnhof bunker, Švecka

lepo im tu...deluje moderno.

[Musharaf]

--------------------------------------------- -----BALKANS: SERBS CAN'T WIN IN BOTH KOSOVO AND THE EU--------------------------------------------- -----¶10. (C/NF) Galharague asked that the USG work together withthe EU to discourage the Serbians from proposing a new U.N.resolution on Kosovo, stating that Serbian Foreign MinisterJeremic "seems to believe Serbia can win on Kosovo and win EUentry. We need to let him know this is not true." Rightnow, Galharague reported, "the Serbs are furious with us (theFrench)" in response to the demarche the GOF delivered inBelgrade in early February (reftel) about Serbia's possibleplans for a U.N. resolution. "We delivered the message invery forceful terms." In fact, the Serbs interpreted thedemarche as a major change in position, Galharague reported.PARIS 00000207 003.2 OF 004The EU had thus far maintained the position that the issuesof Kosovo and Serbian entry into the EU were not formallylinked. "There was no formal conditionality," Galharaguesaid, adding that the Serbs now understand that to be amember of the EU they must eventually recognize Kosovo. "Wetold them we do not want another Cyprus," he explained,referring to Cyprus' controversial EU accession in 2004 as adivided island where EU legislation remains partly"suspended" in the northern part of the island which isoutside of the government in Nicosia's control. Nonetheless,Galharague predicted the Serbs will likely go ahead with theU.N. resolution in any case, and the USG and the EU will beforced to oppose it.¶11. (C/NF) Furthermore, Galharague asserted, before theSerbs join the EU, they will need to resolve key issues withKosovo in the fields of justice, police, customs, transport,agriculture, and also any differences over names andterminology. The best way for Serbia to address issuesrelated to Kosovo is by working with the European Union Ruleof Law Mission in Kosovo (EULEX). "At the end of the day,though," he reiterated, "Serbia must recognize Kosovo if itwants to join the EU."

Банкет у Блитви, издали су Рођера.

[hazard]

Vau, kao da to nismo znali.