Jump to content
IGNORED

islamski ekstremizam


wall

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

 

ne znam gde bih drugde ovaj simpatičan klip

 

nemam nameru da prejzujem nasera, ne znam puno o periodu, nego samo kao duh vremena 

Edited by McCabe
  • Replies 3.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Аврам Гојић

    373

  • Hella

    361

  • Indy

    217

  • kim_philby

    205

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Posted

Naser i drugi arapski nacionalisti su bili najveći neprijatelji zatucanog radikalnog islama. Međutim, arapski nacionalizam je za Izrael bio opasniji od zatucanih islamista, tako da jebiga. To nam je što nam je.

Posted

ko bi rekao da će korisni idioti u svojoj zemlji organizovati polno segregirane sastanke a u spoljnoj politici biti u fazonu samo nek daeš i dalje kolje pali i strelja po siriji :fantom:

 

Some three-quarters of Labour members are against the UK bombing Islamic State targets in Syria, the party has claimed.

 

The results of the survey ordered by party leader Jeremy Corbyn come as he prepares to meet his shadow cabinet to try and agree a collective position on military action.

 

One of Mr Corbyn's closest allies has urged him to "show leadership" and order Labour MPs to vote against launching a bombing campaign in light of the results.

 

Diane Abbott said "the party as a whole" is opposed and "looking to Jeremy to show leadership".

 

http://news.sky.com/story/1597071/syria-75-percent-of-labour-members-against-airstrikes

Posted (edited)

Исламски есктремисти из Сирије се полако пребацују према Ираку, Јемену и Либији.

Да ствар буде гора, Саудијска интервенција у Јемену(која је све гора по њих, почели да губе сопствену територију, локална племена нису нешто вољна да се боре за племе ал Сауд против Хута), је била у коалицији са Ал-Каидом и ИД а сада су се они окренули против својих савезника и тренутно покушавају да узму цео Аден, једини успех Саудијска коалиције у Јемену. Хади, који је под патронатом Саудијаца, је пре пар дана дошао у Аден, пошто престоницу Јемена, Сану, држе Хути и део јеменске војске, поново побегао због напредовања АК и ИД.

 

Што се тиче напредовања ИД на северу Сирије, то је много више последица сукоба про-САД нове војне формације, SDF(Syrian Democratic Forces), и исламистичких група, укључјући и тзв FSA, него ли руског бомбардовања, које на том простору уопште није био изражено.

 

Comedy of Errors: “U.S. Backed Rebels” Fight “U.S. Backed Rebels” in Northern Aleppo

http://www.globalresearch.ca/comedy-of-errors-u-s-backed-rebels-fight-u-s-backed-rebels-in-northern-aleppo/5492374

 

 

f you are a policymaker in Washington; it has to be a difficult week for you, as the U.S. backed “Free Syrian Army” (FSA) and their Islamist allies fight the U.S. backed “Syrian Democratic Forces” (SDF) in the northern Aleppo countryside.

 

New Syrian rebel alliance formed, says weapons on the way

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/10/12/us-mideast-crisis-syria-kurds-idUSKCN0S60BD20151012

Edited by Korki
Posted (edited)

http://news.antiwar.com/2015/12/02/al-qaeda-seizes-key-yemen-cities-as-southern-presence-grows/

 

Al-Qaeda Seizes Key Yemen Cities as Southern Presence Grows

 

Posted By Jason Ditz On  December 2, 2015

Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) was among the most direct beneficiaries when Saudi Arabia launched its war against Yemen back in March, seizing the remote port city of al-Mukalla as a base of operations early on, as the Shi’ite Houthis were no longer able to target them, and the Saudis were simply unwilling.

abyan.jpg

As the war has dragged on, AQAP has gotten bigger and bigger, and has now seized several more towns and cities, including the Abyan Provincial capital of Zinjibar and the nearby town of Jaar, both held by pro-Saudi forces and both evacuated when AQAP rolled in.

Pro-Saudi officials claimed they’d fought tooth and nail to keep AQAP out, but locals reported only a handful of deaths, and said AQAP arrived amid a virtually total absence of defenses. An AQAP allied faction, Ansar al-Shariah, controlled Abyan Province during the Arab Spring rebellions as well.

But AQAP getting direct control of cities is only part of the story, with the group also establishing a presence within Saudi-held territory, including in their “temporary capital” of Aden, where parts of the city regularly hold AQAP-run parades and Islamist factions operate with relative impunity.

Though the Saudi forces are still presenting the war as aiming to reinstall former President Hadi, who resigned in January, the war has overwhelmingly been couched in sectarian terms, Sunni states fighting the Shi’ites over Yemen. In that regard, it is perhaps unsurprising how ambivalent they’ve been about AQAP’s growth, as that group too is anti-Shi’ite, but when the war shakes out AQAP will have dramatically grown their power, and Hadi was struggling to contain them even when they were virtually land-less.

Edited by slow
Posted

 

da je prihvatio na vreme da religija miratm jeste religiji mira, možda ne bi bio ubijen. (?)

jer je očigledno reč o islamskom terorizmu

 

Two weeks before the shooting, Thalasinos had a "heated on-the-job discussion" with Syed Rizwan Farook, one of the two current suspects, about Islam, CBS reports. Kuuleme Stephens, a friend of Thalasinos who had been brought into the debate, said that Thalasinos and Farook had disagreed on whether or not Islam was a "peaceful religion," with Farook claiming that it was and saying that Americans do not understand the religion.

Posted

Saudijska Arabija mi sve više liči na Vizantiju cca 720AD. Gnjila kruška spremna da je neko ubere. 

Posted (edited)

..

Edited by Pečorin
Posted

Saudijska Arabija mi sve više liči na Vizantiju cca 720AD. Gnjila kruška spremna da je neko ubere. 

po čemu je Vizantija u vreme Lava III bila gnjila kruška?

Posted

po čemu je Vizantija u vreme Lava III bila gnjila kruška?

 

Moja greška, stavio sam 7 umesto 6. Mislio sam na lakoću kojom su joj Arapi oduzeli Siriju, Liban, Palestinu, Egipat, Severnu Afriku i parče Španije. 

Posted

Whether you are Nobel Peace Prize recipient Barack Obama or unabashed warmonger John McCain, if you hold a federally elected office in the United States and are calling for more military action in the Middle East without first addressing the crimes against humanity carried out by Saudi Arabia, you are a fraud and should resign — effective immediately.

I don’t mean resign next week or later today. I mean now. Stop what you’re doing, write out a letter (or get a staff member to write one for you), and give a press conference. I don’t care how you do it — just resign. Don’t put your name on the ballot for another term in Congress, don’t seek higher office, and certainly don’t run for president. Stop the charade. You do not represent your constituents. You are a disgrace. Resign.

 

Why do you glorify spending our tax dollars on establishing a military presence in Syria and Iraq for your stated purpose of obliterating ISIS — a group of ‘radical Muslims’ who barbarically behead human beings — all while the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) has been responsible for at least 152 public beheadings of their own since January 1, 2015? If you don’t consider a nation that sentences a man to decapitation for writing love poems (which Saudi Arabia recently did) to be “radical,” then you are deranged. Why do one group’s human rights violations warrant swift military action while another group that commits the same transgressions is heralded as an ally?

How stupid do you think “we the people” are?

The world can see you smiling through your scowl as we become wise to the fact that you are using the instability created by ISIS as an excuse to overthrow Assad.

You may retort that President Obama has repeatedly stated there will be no boots on the ground in Syria (even though there have been) — and how dare I claim that ISIS is being used as a tool for American interests? Aside from the 44th president’s words not being worth much, Obama has advanced the U.S. government’s policy to train and arm “moderate” Syrian rebels in the region — while simultaneously launching airstrikes on their behalf. You and I both know this practice has undeniably resulted in the perpetual arming and strengthening of ISIS. And since it is no secret that the U.S. wants Bashar al-Assad out of power as the leader of Syria, it is glaringly obvious you are willing to tolerate a few radical jihadis running amok over in the Middle East as long as your interests are served as a result of their presence. Although we can agree Assad is a dictator who has committed many ruthless acts of his own, we both know this is not why you wish for him to be ousted, nor is it a legitimate reason to overthrow the Syrian government.

If any of you truly cared about ending atrocity and oppression, you would be speaking out against the vicious Saudi regime. Instead, you welcomed King Salman with open arms in September when he and his entourage rented out all 222 rooms of the elegant and costly Georgetown Four Seasons during an official state visit to meet with President Obama at the White House. You allowed the Pentagon to honor King Abdullah at the time of his passing in January, when the DoD sponsored an essay contest as a “tribute to the life and leadership” of the brutal monarch. Instead, you stay quiet as Saudi Arabia is elected to chair the UN Human Rights Council (a decision beyond ludicrous). Instead, you remain silent as the U.S. State Department approves the sale of $1.3 billion worth of air-to-ground munitions, such as laser-guided bombs and “general purpose” bombs, to the kingdom just last month — not to mention the $90 billion worth of Saudi arms sales you approved between 2010 and 2015.

What is Saudi Arabia doing with the legions of weapons you are supplying to them? They are using them on civilians. Of the 5,700 people killed in Yemen by Saudi-led forces since March 26, over 2,500 have been civilians, including 830 women and children, according to the United Nations.

In October, KSA threatened its own citizens with the death penalty for spreading ‘rumors’ about the government on social media. The kingdom also recently sentenced multiple activists to death by crucifixion for protesting — including 20-year-old Ali Mohammed al-Nimr, who was 17 at the time of his arrest.

 

Also, you know how you have used “9/11″ as an excuse to carry out every single one of your constitutional shredding whims over the past 14 years? You are aware the government says 15 of the 19 hijackers on 9/11 were Saudi nationals, right? Your response? Invade Iraq — a country that had nothing to do with the attacks. Meanwhile, the Saudi royal family enjoyed a day out on the farm with George W. Bush at his Crawford, Texas ranch.

You have also helped block the release of 28 redacted pages from a congressional intelligence report said to contain damning information implicating Saudi complicity in the attacks on 9/11. And of course, you use the tired line of “national security” to keep those pages suppressed . . . because 9/11, of course. Can you see the irony here?

Republicans, you love to find reasons to scold the president, but I have never once heard one of you criticize him for accepting around $1.35 million in gifts from the kingdom in 2014. That’s probably because you would have taken it, too.

How about the front-running Democratic nominee for president of the United States, Hillary Clinton? You, too, are someone who has benefitted greatly from a relationship with Saudi Arabia.

According to Mother Jones:

“In 2011, the State Department cleared an enormous arms deal: Led by Boeing, a consortium of American defense contractors would deliver $29 billion worth of advanced fighter jets to Saudi Arabia, despite concerns over the kingdom’s troublesome human rights record. In the years before Hillary Clinton became secretary of state, Saudi Arabia had contributed $10 million to the Clinton Foundation, and just two months before the jet deal was finalized, Boeing donated $900,000 to the Clinton Foundation.”

Although you don’t currently hold office, Hillary, you should hold yourself accountable (yeah, fat chance) and drop out of the race. And you should do it today.

We both know the Saudi Arabian Embassy keeps Tony Podesta, the brother of Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman, on retainer. Podesta is head of one of the largest Republican Super PACs in the U.S. and chairs a law firm with deep ties to the Obama administration. Ignacio Sanchez, one of Jeb Bush’s top fundraisers, also lobbies on behalf of the Saudi Kingdom. But you don’t see a conflict of interest, I’m sure.

During King Salman’s visit in September, the Kingdom helped sponsor lavish galas at Washington’s Ritz Carlton and the Andrew Mellon Auditorium. These affairs were attended by chief executives of Lockheed Martin and General Electric, as well as the chairman of Marriott International. Do you see a problem, yet? At all?

How about Qorvis, the PR firm that has openly worked for the Saudis since, ironically, a few months after 9/11. They must do something for the $7 million they received from the Saudi government between April and September of this year alone. How much influence does that purchase? The $2,000 Qorvis paid to former Republican congressman Mark Kennedy for a speaking engagement is nothing compared to what is spent to garner airtime on cable news networks — something Saudi officials have been doing more and more regularly.

Politicians who hypocritically align themselves with figures as merciless as those they publicly rebuke have shown themselves to be untrustworthy. They should represent no one. Working alongside the Saudis while bombing other countries for similar actions demonstrates your shameful willingness to go along with whatever self-serving agenda is presented to you. You were for sale but now have sold, and the time has arrived for you to pay up.

Should you continue your flagrant support of Saudi Arabia by way of foreign aid and weapons sales, you are no longer to be trusted to hold an elected position of influence. You should therefore resign, effective immediately.

Posted

sva beda od realnosti otkinutog građanizma u jednoj vesti :fantom:

 

2F24BA5500000578-0-image-a-5_14495118464

 

 

A Muslim convert who protested outside Parliament with a sign saying 'I am Muslim, do you trust me enough for a hug?' is facing jail for threatening to bomb an MP's house.

 

Craig Wallace used the sign as Stop The War protesters came to Westminster for the vote on military action in Syria last week.

 

It stated: 'I am Muslim, I am labelled a terrorist, I trust you, do you trust me enough for a hug?'

 

But the 23-year-old, of Willesden Green, north London, is now facing a possible prison sentence after he threatened Tory MP Charlotte Leslie online following the vote.

 

Wallace, who calls himself Muhammad Mujahid Islam online, wrote on Facebook: 'I'm going to smash her windows then drop a bomb on her house while she's tucked up in bed. You dirty f****** pig-s******* s***.'

 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3349803/Muslim-convert-faces-jail-threatening-bomb-MP-s-house.html#ixzz3tjKTI2x0

 

Posted

sva beda od realnosti otkinutog građanizma u jednoj vesti :fantom:

 

 

 

i jos skrndelj nasao nacin kako da se ogrebe za grljenje od strane zenskinja, ne moze valjda da se strpi do obecanih devica u islamskom raju

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...