ToniAdams Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 Ok, onda je br2 za 10 posto lošiji Quote Link to comment
Meazza Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 (edited) In this amazing scene from Spike Jonze's Her, an artificially intelligent operating system (voiced by Scarlett Johansson) enlists the help of a human avatar to have virtual sex with her human lover (Joaquin Phoenix). http://www.criticalcommons.org/Members/ccManager/clips/an-inversion-of-the-cinematic-genre-of-cybersex-in Edited March 28, 2018 by Meazza Quote Link to comment
Meazza Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 On review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, the film has an approval rating of 87% based on 350 reviews, with an average rating of 8.2/10. The site's critical consensus reads, "Visually stunning and narratively satisfying, Blade Runner 2049 deepens and expands its predecessor's story while standing as an impressive filmmaking achievement in its own right."[91] Metacritic, another review aggregator, assigned the film a weighted average score of 81 out of 100, based on 54 critics, indicating "universal acclaim". Quote Link to comment
Radoye Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 Nisam gledao novi BR, vidim ovde konsenzus da je njesra, a upravo sam naleteo na ovo gore pa sad ne znam da li treba gledati ili ne... :/ Quote Link to comment
Jimmy Kowalski Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 Ma kakav konsenzus, to par njih ponavlja svoje komentare da se stvori takav privid.. Pravi ljubitelji filma su objektivno ocenili da je BR2049 vrlo dobar, odlican 4+.. Quote Link to comment
Caligula Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 (edited) 2 hours ago, Radoye said: Nisam gledao novi BR, vidim ovde konsenzus da je njesra ? Dobro je sto nisam citao komplet temu, ja stekao utisak da konzenzusa nema film svakako vredi pogledati. Edited March 28, 2018 by Caligula Quote Link to comment
ToniAdams Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 Solidan pre nego dobar, al ajd Quote Link to comment
ToniAdams Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 PaI da, ko je propustio da pogleda u bioskopu zbilja nema potrebe da pokušava gajbi Quote Link to comment
precog Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 6 hours ago, ToniAdams said: PaI da, ko je propustio da pogleda u bioskopu zbilja nema potrebe da pokušava gajbi Otkud ti znas kakva je cija gajba? Quote Link to comment
Caligula Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 +1 Evo snapshot sad fotko Quote Link to comment
kipo Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 Meni je bolje legao na drugo gledanje, kući. U bioskopu bila samo 3d projekcija a film je rađen za 2d. A možda je sugestivno jer sam znao ovo prije projekcije. Quote Link to comment
Filozof manijak Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 Gledao sam ga 5 puta (tri puta u bioskopu), na više gledanja postaje sve bolji. (što mi se naročita sviđa kod filmova) Quote Link to comment
ToniAdams Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 Jel dobilo smisla ono sa matrix corabakom? Quote Link to comment
Meazza Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 Zaista ne bih da nerviram ljude kojima se dopao film, ali ako je moguce ipak bih izneo razloge zbog kojih sam onako reagovao na BR 2049. Ima toliko toga da ne znam odakle da pocnem, ali najvise od svega bih voleo da procitam zasto su neki odusevljeni Goslingovom glumom. Cuo sam argumente koji se mogu sumirati kao "Njegova bezizrazajna gluma odgovara ponasanju replikanta." Podsetio bih vas da su u originalnom filmu replikanti daleko puniji duha i zivota od ljudi. Uporedimo lik Roja Betija sa likom K (ili Joe-a) ili bilo kog replikanta u novom filmu i lako cemo uociti ambis koji ih deli. Lik Roja Betija je prepun zivota, cesto duhovit i ironican kao nijedan drugi covek kojeg smo videli u distopijskom svetu (pogotovo u odnosu na Dekarda) sto je genijalno i revolucionarno u kontekstu u kojeg ga posmatramo. Ne samo Roj, vec recimo i Zhora za koju osecamo tugu kad je Dekard ubije jer ne osecamo da ima iceg robotskog u sebi. Ovde je potpuno obrnuto. Svi replikanti odmah deluju kao replikanti, ne mora niko ni da nam pojasnjava da nisu pravi ljudi. U umetnickom smislu novi film nema veze sa Blejd Ranerom nikakve, osim sto su u njegovo pravljenje ukljucene iste osobe i sto se prvi film koristi kao polazna tacka. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.