Jump to content

Doping afere


Recommended Posts


Prescription stimulants have a calming and “focusing” effect on individuals with ADHD.


Fokus i koncentracija, nebitno za sportiste. :whistle:

Poremecaj ili ne, daje joj prednost.

Inace, 10% americke dece su dijagnostifikovani sa ADHD.


I sta cemo sa doziranjem?



Ne mora da bude zloupotreba, ali joj objektivno daje prednost.

Edited by Budja
Link to comment
  • Replies 198
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • borris_


  • Budja


  • Halvard


  • Korki


Top Posters In This Topic

Fokus i koncentracija, nebitno za sportiste. :whistle:



Pa naravno da je bitno, zato je ona u tu nepovoljnom položaju u odnosu na ostale ako ne koristi taj lek. Šta je tu sporno? :mellow:

Što se doziranja tiče, postoji određena terapijska doza, ako su nalazi izvan njenog ranga, to se smatra zloupotrebom i prekršajem.


Inače, Šarapova nije uzimala lekove za kijavicu, možda misliš na Andreu Radukan. To jeste bio dosta kontroverzan slučaj i poprilična svinjarija MOK-a. 

Edited by Halvard
Link to comment

Шарапова је узимала лек за бољи проток крви а њено званично обајшњење за 10 година коришћења је да има неке проблеме са дијабетесом у фамилији и недостатак магенизијума. Тешко за поверовати.

Исто је чудно да Параолимпијада има више здравих људи од ОИ, нарочито међу врхунским спортистима.

Link to comment

Pa naravno da je bitno, zato je ona u tu nepovoljnom položaju u odnosu na ostale ako ne koristi taj lek. Šta je tu sporno? :mellow:

Što se doziranja tiče, postoji određena terapijska doza, ako su nalazi izvan njenog ranga, to se smatra zloupotrebom i prekršajem.


Inače, Šarapova nije uzimala lekove za kijavicu, možda misliš na Andreu Radukan. To jeste bio dosta kontroverzan slučaj i poprilična svinjarija MOK-a. 


Ili povoljnijem,ko ce ga znati.

Mozda su primetili talenat i fokus i koncentraciju rano, pa je zato pocela da se bavi gimnastikom.


Nacin lecenja ADHD je vrlo razlicit od zemlje do zemlje.

Link to comment

šta, kortikosteroidi su zabranjeni? (vidim ovde prednizolon i metilprednizolon)

Vishe vole da gledaju bubuljicave tenisere nego drogirane, cenim?

Osim ako se ne radi o metronidazolu (ili tako nekako), onda ne znam...

Link to comment
ODGOVOR RUSKIM HAKERIMA Ovako su američke zvezde sporta reagovale na navode da se dopinguju


Razočarana sam bila kada sam saznala da su moji privatni, medicinski podaci pali u ruke hakera i da su objavljeni bez moje saglasnosti. Korišćenje pomenutih medikamenata podrazumeva, prema teniskom Anti-doping programu, striktno držanje pravila i dobijanje dozvola. Tome sam se i povinovala čim su me zadesila ozbiljna zdravstvena stanja. Ja sam jedna od onih osoba koji se najjače zalažu za pravila koje propisuju i svetska i američka Anti-doping agencija, i Međunarodna teniska federacaija i, uopšte, kolektivni teniski anti-doping program", navodi se u saopštenju 36-godišnji teniserke, osvajačice sedam grend slem titula u pojedinačnoj konkurenciji, 14 u konkurenciji ženskih parova, a dve u miks dublu.

Link to comment



Prvo mi je zvučalo kao da je saopštenje Fancy bears pisao DJV, neozbiljno i šarlatanski. Da bi na kraju ispalo da su dokumenti autentični.



edit: pa posle Korać lud


Edited by April
Link to comment

Odličan članak o prošlogodišnjem finalu RG-a, mislim da nije ranije postovan:



First game – Djokovic 0-0 Wawrinka

The first game, it’s serious. We went right at it. To me, it was important. I was super nervous before the match, I had a lot of doubts: ‘Everyone says he’s unplayable. What’s going to happen?’ Once I was on the court, during the warm-up, I tried to take advantage of the situation. I told myself several times: ‘Stan, you’re in the final at Roland-Garros. How often have you dreamed of this? Look at the stadium, look at what’s happening!” In fact, I looked at it as if I were almost having an out-of-body experience. ‘Come on, enjoy! Do your thing!’ I listen to the announcer who’s reading out all of Djokovic’s accomplishments, I look at the crowd to see if they applaud, I look at the sky because it’s a beautiful day …

I sit down on my chair and I switch in a second. It’s easy for me: I can have ten million things going on in my head, but I can switch and concentrate in a second. I’ve done it lots of times. In my chair, I’m already in the first game: ‘How are you going to serve the first point? Are you going to let loose right away? etc.’

I have a very clear game plan, but it’s open to modification. I knew that with him there was no feeling-out round. The proof is the first game. I play incredibly, and yet I’m on serve. Djoko is a machine and the motor is already running.

But, at the end of the first game, everything’s good mentally; physically, I’m fine and I’m not going to lose because of my level of game. It will be played on nerves, hesitations, but not on game feelings. From the very first hit, I feel on top. It’s good, the final has begun …

Djokovic 5-4 Wawrinka – last game of the first set

It’s a key moment. Novak broke me quickly because I was too hesitant. Actually, I haven’t let loose, really get inside him. I have a little mental block. When you’re behind in the score, when you’ve been broken , you always play a bit tighter. You look for something to come back with. But at 5-4, 40-15, I make two points that are essential to the story of the final. First, I make a passing shot. Then I win a point on a dropper. I end up losing the game, and then everything changed for me in my head, but I don’t know why. I feel I’m on the way, I’m there mentally. I needed some sort of small trigger to let loose. I found it there. The match really starts here. It was that game that gave me confidence for the rest ot it. Why? Because I did what I wanted to do at the start of the match. I want to push him, push him, and if he’s stronger than me, good on him. But I tell myself, I’m going to go and get this match. That’s how a lost game can be a release.

Djokovic 6-4 3-4 Wawrinka – at 4-3 in the second set

When I hit the net twice with my racquet, it was the only time I felt frustrated during this final. Why then? Because I’m ahead 4-3, and that since the start of the second set, I feel I have chances to move ahead. And I don’t do it. On the second dropshot, I’m upset because I can’t miss a shot like that when I’m on it. ‘Sh*t, you’re screwing up, don’t miss shots like that!’

From the start of the second set, I sense him starting to hesitate. If he’s hitting dropshots like that, it’s because he’s not finding answers from the baseline. He’s starting to back up on long rallies. At the start, each tried to impose themselves from the baseline. But I start to hit so hard and heavy that he doesn’t quite know what to do from the baseline. In fact, he’s being dominated, and he needs to change something. That’s true of all players who feel they’re being dominated. So, in the second set, he starts to hit dropshots. In the fourth, he’ll serve-and-volley to save break points.

Sure, I see that as something difficult, but against Djokovic, you always walk a fine line. What I mean to say is, Djokovic is different: even when he isn’t playing as well as usual, he’s always present in the moment. That’s why he’s better than anyone else in the world.

Djokovic 6-4 4-5 Wawrinka – final game of the second set

The sound my shots are making is huge. I’m playing with incredible pace. I saw the speed of my baseline shots: 145 kph, 150 kph, 160 kph … The set point, against a lot of players, I win it five times. But he’s getting all my shots back. At the end of the game, I’m at the point I was looking for: I managed to get ahead. I sense he’s nervous, but I’m not surprised: when I play well, I know I make him nervous. I’ve felt that before at the Australian and US Opens. He can’t be serene; after that game, he knows that I can be the stronger one. But it’s not the turning point of the match. Against him, as long as you haven’t won the final point, there’s no turning point in the strict sense.

That gesture to Magnus where I tap my forefinger on my temple, at the end, that’s just a natural gesture. It just means, “I’m there, I know exactly what I’m doing, I won’t let up mentally.”

Djokovic 6-4 4-6 2-3 — Third set break and the the famous backhand hole shot

At 3-2 in the 3rd set, I hit a huge forehand and a backhand down the line. I start to really open the throttle. On top of that, Novak looks at his team with the air of someone asking, “What do you want me to do?” Later at 5-2, there’s the famous backhand from the corner … I say with all humility, it’s not an unlikely shot. After all, I’m four in the world, I’m the final at Roland, which means I’m playing very well. I see the hole and I go for it. I’m very far from the ball, but I control my slide really well to take the ball really low. It wasn’t lucky, I hit it to make it. Besides, three weeks later at Wimbledon against Verdasco, I did it again.

It’s obvious now, I’m bringing the juice. But, before that hole shot, how many shots was I hitting in that zone at 150 kph? And then, the better you feel the more the ball gets close to the lines. It stays inside the court for a good reason: there’s no hesitation. Now I’m really on top of what I can do. That final, it’s the best match I’ve ever played in my career. I feel like a steamroller that wants to finish the job. Once you release the brakes, once you step on the accelerator you just play. I mean, you play the tennis you know how to play.

Djokovic 6-4 4-6 3-6 3-1 Wawrinka — the break back

I win the second set 6-4, the third set 6-3, and yet I’m behind 3-0 in the 4th! I said it before: against him, you walk a fine line. Instead of going down a level, he adds a level. But he submits anyway. You can hear it in his grunt. It’s not the same grunt as when he controls a point. The long thirty-shot rally, it’s to show him that I’m not letting up. I feel him tamed physically. His grunt is different – he’s trying to put extra into his shots. Winning that point makes me stronger. I want absolutely to stay in contact in the 4th set.

Djokovic 6-4 4-6 6-3 4-5 – the final game

I’m still on top, but I’m fried. There are long rallies, we hit, we hit, we hit … he starts to serve-and-volley, he’s at the net more often and I hit a passing shot to break him. I make a simple gesture, and in a half-second I’m already in my next service game. I’m very calm. I walk calmly to my seat. No need for a ‘come on’. After, it’s the last game … I’m serving for the match. And when I need to save a break-point, I don’t panic. I tell myself, ‘If that’s the score, it’s because you’re playing better than he is. At the worst, it’s 5-5. And so? Well, we’ll just start over.’ That frame of mind makes the difference. That detail is probably what bests sums up my final. I couldn’t have had a nicer match point to win Roland. Big serve outside, backhand down the line: that point sums up my whole game and the whole 15 days.

Djokovic 6-4 4-6 63 6-4 – The joy and the ceremony

Already before the Melbourne final, I asked myself what I’d do if I won. Roll around on the ground? Lie on the ground? Fall to my knees? And I did nothing. Afterwards, Gaël told me, ‘Sh*t, Stan! I was waiting for you to do something nuts and you did nothing. I’m crushed!’ I’ll never have an answer, but I think it’s just the way I am. My joy is enormous, but it’s internal. You can’t imagine it, but there are so many things going through my head … It doesn’t come out. And I would dream of rolling around on the clay and having a mythical photo taken. But that’s the way it goes … It’s not because of the way I was brought up, but because of the way I learned my tennis. I never dreamed of winning a Slam. Because I never thought I was as good as those who were there. I saw them all on the TV. To me, those who win Slams are monsters. I have a lot of emotions during the ceremony, but it’s the same thing, I don’t show them. Maybe except for when I lift the trophy. Because, still, it’s THE moment.




Link to comment
  • Create New...