Jump to content

Ваша визија...Бога


strixaluco

Recommended Posts

Nema boga.

 

The existence of the body is the manifestation of value (as a function of the Will to Power) without the need for its justification. The need to justify value is a phenomenon of Platonism and religion which, not being able to accept body-as-value, sought to justify value by universalistic and divine means. This entailed the original and originary rejection of life. Without this original and originary rejection of value by the Socratic Judeo-Christian metaphysic and the devaluation of the apparent world by the invention of the ideal, that metaphysic would not have had the opportunity then to invent value as a divine and metaphysical recipe, a value which has the flavor of the political. Species chauvinism is, after all, a biological politics. This substantialist perversion in morality has even affected the development of physics and relates physics to morality in the way they have developed as a consilience in the western world.

 

The wildebeest does not need value. Humans, in the way they have defined value, have wrenched the notion of value. Objective and subjective ethics and Kantian universalism, taboos, animism, soft-core and hard-core reciprocity and biological altruism are mystifications laid on the ethology of a reflective organism, calqued on Platonism and religion, which most likely are responsible for more damage and misery to the organism of homo sapiens than the annual migration of the wildebeest or the mythical self-immolation of lemmings are to those animals. In order to create value the Socratic Judeo-Christian metaphysic had to destroy body-value and value in general. Nietzsche understood that Christianity was at its most basic level a rejection of life... not merely of sensuality, but of life itself as a cosmic phenomenon.

 

It is not incumbent on us to prove the existence of value — it is rather up to ethicists and moralists to disprove it. We do not need a metaphysical value to flourish any more than bugs do and the fact that we congratulate ourselves for our morality does not prove that we need it. The whole history of morality and ethics has been a fraud and an error of those perverted by a metaphysic which began with the assumption of non-value as the nature of things and then tried to invent metaphysico-divine value for tribal and political reasons. For the same reason, nihilism is a problem created by the Socratic Judeo-Christian metaphysic. Nihilism was the original and hidden decision which lay behind the ancient religio-metaphysical rejection of life and is inherent in that rejection. The rat, the gnu, the porcupine and the elephant do not need any value beyond ethology and population genetics — the glass bead games. We humans do not need it either, for because of the parochial and rationalistic religious notion of value we have come to the point of self-extermination. Nietzsche saw that it was based on an ancient rejection of life — an ancient error of the Greeks, the Jews and the Christians. "The Christian wants to be rid of himself" (Nietzsche contra Wagner, Epilogue). The Overman knows that there is no value, and that only in this rejection of value can one begin to find a value. That is one of the things that makes him the Overman, or the philosopher and the moralist of the future. He knows that the Will to Power is value, that Nature is value, and that value as such is not a thing that has to be invented unless one has already destroyed it by some political dirty trick. It is in this conviction that lies Nietzsche's massive optimism which almost has the quality of the scientific, and his vigorous and even enraged denunciation of pessimism, a pessimism which he saw as the most base element of romanticism and Christianity. In this section, we have been discussing the archaeology of morality, and we have seen that what we have long called morality has in fact been immorality.

 

Value is a fiction

 

 

 

 

 

Equilibrium models and Random Walks are part of the Will to Power just as are diffusive, dynamic, creative models. By extrapolating from Nietzsche's system, it becomes evident that he valorized the diffusive models as creative-positive and damned the equilibrium models as conservative, negative, destructive and sick. This is a game-model theory for the origin of Nietzschean values and the enhancement of life for the type Mensch. Morality and ethics are thus seen to be differential valorizations of equilibrated vs diffusive systems. Equilibrated systems preserve their weaknesses at the risk of stasis and catastrophe. In Nietzschean terms, Christianity, Buddhism, nationalism, etc., are such conservative, equilibrated systems. There are no equilibrated survivable models in biological evolution, and even though certain organisms appear stable they lead a precarious existence and become evolutionary dead ends. Rats and cockroaches are successful biologically because they are not equilibrated systems. Genetic and moral stasis guarantees catastrophe.

 

Equilibrium and decadence: the origin of the moral

 

 

 

V8v8Hao.jpg

Edited by miki.bg
Link to comment
  • Replies 138
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Time Crisis

    9

  • Bujodrag

    20

  • slow

    14

  • strixaluco

    12

Bog je u svakom od nas...I nije u instituciji niti u bogomolji.

Verujem u duhovnost i verujem da ne treba da radim drugima ništa što ne želim sebi...

Isto tako, mislim da nam je Bog svima dao slobodu izbora i razum, i odgovornost za izbore koje napravimo...

Isto tako mislim da nije stvar u uzdržavanju od iskustva, već u sticanju istog.

I da je glupo pitanje na krštenju da li se odričemo Satane, kad je zlo deo nas, onoliko koliko i dobro.

Zlo je tu da ga prepoznamo i pretvorimo u dobro, ne da bežimo od njega...Naprosto, sa svojom senkom se treba suočiti i prihvatiti je kao takvu.

To što je crkva sve izvitoperila i napravila od svoje pastve robove nema veze sa Bogom i verom, verujem da su Isus i Marija Magdalena bili muž i žena, kao i u postojanje Judinog i Tominog i drugih iz Biblije izbačenih jevanđelja.

Isto tako verujem da je Bog jedan, a prozori različiti, namerno izvitoperena tumačenja bilo koje vere nemaju veze sa Bogom i verom kao takvima.

Isto tako, mislim da je krajnji cilj vere u Boga samospoznaja. ono pravo izvorno znaćenje reći džihad i ono što se kaže Nosce te ipsum.

"Carstvo Božje je u tebi i svuda oko tebe. Nije u zgradama od drveta i kamena- Polomi drvo, ja sam tu. Skloni kamen, naći ćeš me." Judino jevanđelje

A što se tiče novoveraca i filetizma, od toga mi se povraća...Kao i od predstavljanja pokušaja samoubistva kao štrajka glađu i laganja na stiroporu za vreme uskršnjeg posta. Meni je najlepšu definiciju vere dao Aleksandar Mjenj:"Nalazim više smisla u krilu ptice i grani drveta nego u 500 ikona."

I u onome što je rekao Kazimir Maljevič u "Bog nije zbačen" (filozofskom spisu, ne petotomnom projektu decenije u Rusiji):"A sta je život za crkvu?Duhovno stanje čoveka. Ali gde se duhovnost nalazi? U duši, jer telo je grešno, i kada duša uništi greh u telu, ono postaje sveto, pretvara se u Boga, telo iščezava, postaje duša, ali greh više ne postoji, postoji Bog.Dušu Bog ne može da kazni jer je ona njegov deo, telo kao besmrtno takođe.Otuda u Bogu nema kazni"

A performans Pussy Riot je nešto najbliže mom poimanju religije...Kao i poimanje religije Omara Hajama, Helene Blavacke,Tolstoja, FMD-a,   Reriha, Maljeviča, Berđajeva, Gurđijeva, Uspenskog i Šestova...

Edited by uros_s78
Link to comment

A Beslan?

 

Šta ćemo sa tim? Da li ti je svemogući Bog pomogao da spoznaš greške iz tvog prethodnog života?

 

Pokaj se.

Edited by Anonymous
Link to comment

A Beslan?

 

Šta ćemo sa tim? Da li ti je svemogući Bog pomogao da spoznaš greške iz tvog prethodnog života?

 

Pokaj se.

 

Neće da se pokaje, ne odriče se Satane i loših dela. Uki se sreće sa zlom ali ga se ne odriče, pokušava da ga transformiše, što je uzaludan posao jer Lukavi ima bezbroj lica i nemoguće ga je transformisati u Dobro.

 

I da je glupo pitanje na krštenju da li se odričemo Satane, kad je zlo deo nas, onoliko koliko i dobro.

Zlo je tu da ga prepoznamo i pretvorimo u dobro, ne da bežimo od njega...Naprosto, sa svojom senkom se treba suočiti i prihvatiti je kao takvu.

 

Uki, brkaš jungovu senku, samospoznaju, i iskonsko zlo.

 

07b%20Sveti%20Djordje.jpg

Link to comment
  • 3 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...