Jump to content
IGNORED

Naucni radovi zanimljivi za siru javnost


Filipenko

Recommended Posts

objavljeni dobitnici ignobel nagrada:
Engineering Prize: Karina Acevedo-Whitehouse (UK) and colleagues for perfecting a method to collect whale snot, using a remote-control helicopter.Medicine Prize: Simon Rietveld (Netherlands) and colleagues for discovering that symptoms of asthma can be treated with a roller-coaster ride.Transportation Planning Prize: Toshiyuki Nakagaki (Japan) and colleagues for using slime mould to determine the optimal routes for railroad tracks.Physics Prize: Lianne Parkin (New Zealand) and colleagues for demonstrating that, on icy footpaths in wintertime, people slip and fall less often if they wear socks on the outside of their shoes.Peace Prize: Richard Stephens (UK) and colleagues for confirming the widely held belief that swearing relieves pain.Public health Prize: Manuel Barbeito (US) and colleagues for determining by experiment that microbes cling to bearded scientists.Economics Prize: Awarded to the executives and directors of Goldman Sachs, AIG, Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns, Merrill Lynch, and Magnetar for creating and promoting new ways to invest money — ways that maximize financial gain and minimize financial risk for the world economy, or for a portion thereof.Chemistry Prize: Eric Adams (US) and colleagues for disproving the old belief that oil and water don't mix. The research, supported by BP, was published under the title: "Review of Deep Oil Spill Modeling Activity Supported by the Deep Spill JIP and Offshore Operator's Committee".Management Prize: Alessandro Pluchino (Italy) and colleagues for demonstrating mathematically that organisations would become more efficient if they promoted people at random.Biology Prize: Libiao Zhang (China) and colleagues for scientifically documenting fellatio in fruit bats.
Link to comment
Engineering Prize: Karina Acevedo-Whitehouse (UK) and colleagues for perfecting a method to collect whale snot, using a remote-control helicopter.Medicine Prize: Simon Rietveld (Netherlands) and colleagues for discovering that symptoms of asthma can be treated with a roller-coaster ride.Transportation Planning Prize: Toshiyuki Nakagaki (Japan) and colleagues for using slime mould to determine the optimal routes for railroad tracks.Physics Prize: Lianne Parkin (New Zealand) and colleagues for demonstrating that, on icy footpaths in wintertime, people slip and fall less often if they wear socks on the outside of their shoes.Peace Prize: Richard Stephens (UK) and colleagues for confirming the widely held belief that swearing relieves pain.Public health Prize: Manuel Barbeito (US) and colleagues for determining by experiment that microbes cling to bearded scientists.Economics Prize: Awarded to the executives and directors of Goldman Sachs, AIG, Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns, Merrill Lynch, and Magnetar for creating and promoting new ways to invest money — ways that maximize financial gain and minimize financial risk for the world economy, or for a portion thereof.Chemistry Prize: Eric Adams (US) and colleagues for disproving the old belief that oil and water don't mix. The research, supported by BP, was published under the title: "Review of Deep Oil Spill Modeling Activity Supported by the Deep Spill JIP and Offshore Operator's Committee".Management Prize: Alessandro Pluchino (Italy) and colleagues for demonstrating mathematically that organisations would become more efficient if they promoted people at random.Biology Prize: Libiao Zhang (China) and colleagues for scientifically documenting fellatio in fruit bats.
Meni su super ta istrazivanja, bolja od ovih za pravog Nobela. 1) Kitovi su po definiciji cool, featurovali su i u Sajnfeldu, 2) Ne moram da objasnjavam sta ovo znaci pacijentima od astme, posebno zaposlenim u luna parkovima 3) "Delo govori umesto reci", zna se ciji su vozovi najbolji, samuraji ne biraju sredstva do pobede 4) Zvuci kao nesto sto ce nasekirati Leiu, ali na prvoj sledecoj poledici, sto se dogadja svakih 200.000 godina u Australiji, nosim carape preko cipela 5) O znacaju ovih rezultata, posebno za 1 Srbina, suvisno je trositi reci, picka mu bre 1 materina 6) Ovo je pomalo dosadno 7) ostavicu Mayday da komentarise, ali zar im ne bi bolje pasovala 1 robija umesto ignobela 8) zvuci kao 1 preko potrebna studija 9) ovo je totalno fenomenalno, po tome bih i ja mogao biti promovisan nekad 10) zasluzuju i specijalnu Rachida Dati nagradu (u formi dildoa of kors). Edited by Indy
Link to comment
a 9) ovo je totalno fenomenalno, po tome bih i ja mogao biti promovisan nekad
nije mi jasno sto izabrase ovo. dosta ljudi se bave peter principom, a ovaj zakljucak mi deluje kao posledica principa. ako svi teze dodju do nivoa na kome nisu kompetentni, random rasporedjivanje ce dovesti do jednake raspodele nekompetentnosti po nivoima, sto intuitivno izgleda kao najbolje resenje. pravda za alessandra!
Link to comment
nije mi jasno sto izabrase ovo. dosta ljudi se bave peter principom, a ovaj zakljucak mi deluje kao posledica principa. ako svi teze dodju do nivoa na kome nisu kompetentni, random rasporedjivanje ce dovesti do jednake raspodele nekompetentnosti po nivoima, sto intuitivno izgleda kao najbolje resenje. pravda za alessandra!
Понекад се питам како су крајем четрдесетих нашли онолико младих интелектуалаца, уметника, педагога, директора, виших полицајаца... кад погледаш биографије фаца које су постале некакви великани педесетих и шездесетих, више од пола њих је бачено у посао којим се баве скоро насумице. Онај виц са Мујиним свирањем клавира ("можда и умијем, нијесам пробао") се изгледа догађао на све стране, па су људи у трку учили послове за које нису ни сањали да ће их икад радити. Насумица је чудо једно, половина промаши, половина успе, поготову у атмосфери где су сви такви и где нема ко да каже "како можеш да помислиш да се бавиш ***ом, кад не знаш ни ко је ***, ниси читао ***, не разликујеш ** од **" и слично. А и онај оптимизам је био мало заразан, људи гледали да се покажу како умеју, да допринесу обнови & изградњи, да се не обрукају пред народом и партијом. Запињали својски и на крају многи испадали компетентни, без обзира на претходно образовање.
Link to comment

Barem nekoliko profesora koji su mene ucili (mislim na faks) su bili postavljeni tu po partijskoj liniji. Poslala ih partija posle rata da edukuju omladinu. Neki od njih nisu bili ni losi (ili u svakom slucaju ne gori od proseka, koji i nije bio neki... ja sam ipak bio na poljoprivredu :ss1: )

Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...
Brave Margot & Betty, vrlo ste trazene i moli se vasa nazocnost naovom topicu. Naravno, ukoliko ste zainteresirane. :)
videla sam temu ali mi nije dovoljno privukla paznju, a sad vec ima 14 strana. ali generalno mi je taj marketinski deo psihologije najvise od svih smerova licio na prodavanje magle, makar iz teorijskog ugla, pa sam se klonila i tih predmeta i knjiga i ljudi. tako da sigurno ne bih mogla da ucestvujem kao bilo sta vise od laika.
Link to comment

Da, s tim sto Betty uopce ne prati temu, pa ne zna da je krucijalno ovo pitanje:

Kljuc je, dakle, da li i koliko skenovi mozga imaju veze sa onim sto ljudi zaista misle (i koliko je ta asocijacija precizna, ako je uopste).
Slazem se, ali samo ukoliko se pitanje odnosi generalno na skeniranje mozga kao metodu kojom se sluzi kompletna neuroznanost, npr. u zdravstvene svrhe. Ako je problem samo zato sto se fMRI koristi za neuromarketing, onda je ta kritika bullshit.
Mozda ce Brave imati vise zivaca (i vremena) da nam nesto kaze.
Link to comment

e, pa pomoglo bi da sam videla pitanje, mada mi je i dalje nejasno sta se podrazumeva pod 'zaista misle'. prelistala sam temu tri strane unazad, videla tu i tamo mozak ali ne i kako je nastalo pitanje. mozda kasnije danas. na 3 coska jesam, ustala sam u 4:18. jos par nedelja ovako i osnovacu fight club.

Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...

feist ukazuje strukturnim modelom naucne eminencije da pohadjanje anger management kursa moze katastrofalno da se odrazi na karijeru u svom clanku iz 1993:feist (1993) A structural model of scientific eminence. Psychological Science, 6, 366-371.

In this research I provide the first structural equations model of scientific eminence. The data are consistent with the model and suggest that attaining eminence in science is the result of a complex interplay between demographic, personality, working-style, motivational, and productivity influences. This structural model shows that while hostile personality has a direct influence on eminence, other psychological factors have significant but indirect influences on eminence. Arrogant working style and extrinsic motivation have direct influences on scientific productivity, which in turn has a direct influence on eminence. In short, psychological factors provide the foundation for productivity, and productivity is the sine qua non of eminence.
Edited by BraveMargot
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...